C&C Welcome
Gnarly
by tmoore323, on Flickr7D
M
ISO 1000
1/320
70-200@70mm - 12 stiched shots
f3.2
tmoore323 Goldmember  1,945 posts Likes: 4 Joined Oct 2010 More info | Apr 28, 2013 17:06 | #1 C&C Welcome Gnarly by tmoore323, on Flickr7D M ISO 1000 1/320 70-200@70mm - 12 stiched shots f3.2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KirkS518 Goldmember  3,983 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2012 Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh More info | Apr 28, 2013 17:40 | #2 I think I see what you had in mind, but I don't think it came out in the photo. It really looks like a jumbled mess of branches, with no real subject. The house/shed on the left needs to be cloned or cropped out, too. If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 28, 2013 17:53 | #3 Tried it without the house, and liked it with it in, perhaps others will have your opinion as well
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bob_r Goldmember More info | Apr 28, 2013 18:29 | #4 Have you tried a B & W conversion? I don't like the house in the shot either. Canon 7D, 5D, 35L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 135L, 200L, 10-22, 17-55, 70-300, 100-400L, 500D, 580EX(2).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 28, 2013 20:30 | #5 Not a fan of the house, the dead limbs just don't stand out enough. Never use a paragraph when a sentence will do.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cpam.pix Goldmember 1,275 posts Likes: 10 Joined Apr 2011 More info | Apr 28, 2013 20:59 | #6 Try reshooting by using the foot-powered zoom. Get up-close and personal...not macro close, but close enough that we can really explore patterns in the branches and textures on the wood. 1D-III with stuff to stick on it:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 28, 2013 21:08 | #7 In addition to what the others said, you can also mess around with processing abit to make the trees stand out more. Here is an example from a recent shoot:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 28, 2013 21:15 | #8 I'd take out the house, focus on the dead tree in front. Maybe b/w or some similar processing 40D, 5D3, a bunch of lenses and other things
LOG IN TO REPLY |
D.Vance Goldmember  4,163 posts Likes: 12 Joined Jan 2011 Location: VA More info | Apr 28, 2013 21:28 | #9 I agree with what the others said; not really much main 'focus' in the shot... Perhaps this is better? I don't know. I played with it for just a few seconds in PSE10. Basically dropped it to black and white, and messed with contrast, brightness, and darkened highlights.  Trees by D. Vance, on FlickrI wonder if the video editors on The Titanic ever went, "Sorry, I can't right now. I'm busy synching the Titanic..."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin  44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | Apr 28, 2013 21:56 | #10 KirkS518 wrote in post #15876602 I think I see what you had in mind, but I don't think it came out in the photo. It really looks like a jumbled mess of branches, with no real subject. The house/shed on the left needs to be cloned or cropped out, too. Have to agree with Kirk.I would have been up close and personal with those trees and textures. Might have more of an impact seeing the bark itself and some twists and turns. The house adds nothing to the scene,the whole image is also on a slant to the left. you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 29, 2013 07:58 | #11 All that green seemed out of place with the dead trees so how about this?  Image hosted by forum (647037) © Qbx [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. -- Image Editing OK --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 29, 2013 11:34 | #12 Qbx wrote in post #15878387 All that green seemed out of place with the dead trees so how about this? Nice, looks like something out of a horror movie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 29, 2013 11:35 | #13 D. Vance wrote in post #15877218 I agree with what the others said; not really much main 'focus' in the shot... Perhaps this is better? I don't know. I played with it for just a few seconds in PSE10. Basically dropped it to black and white, and messed with contrast, brightness, and darkened highlights. edit: it is set to 'private' on Flickr.  Trees by D. Vance, on FlickrNice, that better conveys what I was "seeing" thanks!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 29, 2013 11:36 | #14 rioni wrote in post #15877161 In addition to what the others said, you can also mess around with processing abit to make the trees stand out more. Here is an example from a recent shoot:
Wow, that gives me an idea for a reshoot, the yard in front of this house is a scary mess of holes and god knows what else
LOG IN TO REPLY |
howzitboy Goldmember 2,948 posts Joined May 2007 Location: Hawaii More info | Apr 29, 2013 11:39 | #15 lots of fun advice! i agree, the house doesnt work in the shot... and i like Darin's take on it better, it isolates that dead tree way better. http://onehourwedding.blogspot.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1085 guests, 115 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
