Well, I've reluctantly ventured into the area of wedding photography. I didn't want to, but this young lady, my wife's friend, was in a jam. She's getting married at the beach, about 350 miles away. Because so many of her friends and family can't make it, she's having the reception two weeks later in town. Only one photographer she contacted would agree to do the job, but at $4,000 he's about 4x the going rate around here. She couldn't afford that, so she asked me. I'm doing it for free, and making her wedding album and prints as her wedding present.
We did the bridal shoot on Sunday. Because of a heavy, steady rain, we had to stay indoors. Unfortunately, despite the fact that we were in an enormous house, room was limited and I didn't get a good full-length shot of her entire dress. I'll have another chance at the beach.
This was my first time shooting a bride. Any tips or comments from you experienced wedding photographers would be so much appreciated.
I started out simple. It's really hard to take a bad picture of this girl, but I'm sure that, if it's possible, I'll find a way.
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
_MG_7602Meredith Bridal
I converted this one to B&W, and added a little sepia toning.
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …gsphotography/8695188615/
_MG_7584Meredith Bridal
This is as close as I could get to a full-length shot.
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …gsphotography/8695193705/
_MG_7539Meredith Bridal
I brought along my infrared-converted Rebel XTI. I liked this shot the best.
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …gsphotography/8695180237/
_MG_7710Meredith Bridal
Any thoughts or comments are appreciated. Like I said, I'll have another go at it on the wedding day, so if there's something here that definitely needs to be corrected, please let me know.






