Tossed
Apr 30, 2013 13:37 | #3 If you have to ask... 500px Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rongage Mostly Lurking 17 posts Joined Jul 2009 Location: Westland, Michigan More info | Apr 30, 2013 13:52 | #5 Oh that is MUCH better to me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rafikiwilliams Member 77 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Maryland More info | Apr 30, 2013 14:23 | #6 rongage wrote in post #15883400  Oh that is MUCH better to me. agreed. much better.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rivas8409 Goldmember  2,500 posts Likes: 586 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Lemoore, California More info | Apr 30, 2013 14:25 | #7 Colors looks flat to me in your modified original. Maybe boost the saturation and vibrance just a bit to bring out that beautiful orange vermilion color of the bridge. Though i have to agree that it's better that the original photo you posted. Body: Canon 5DmkII│Canon M50
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rmt3rd Hatchling 4 posts Joined Apr 2013 Location: Charlotte, NC More info | Apr 30, 2013 14:33 | #8 Agreed. The second photo is much better, but I agree to boost the saturation or vibrancy. 5DM3, 5DM2, 24-70 2.8, 70-200 2.8 II, 24-105 4, 50 1.4, 85 1.8, 100 2.0, 135 2.0, Sigma 150 Macro, 580 EXII, Yongou 560-II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 30, 2013 23:12 | #9 Why was the second pic taken down? 500px Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rmt3rd Hatchling 4 posts Joined Apr 2013 Location: Charlotte, NC More info | May 01, 2013 06:42 | #10 SmokeySiFy wrote in post #15885323 Why was the second pic taken down? You are looking at the 2nd pic. The OP must have taken down the original. 5DM3, 5DM2, 24-70 2.8, 70-200 2.8 II, 24-105 4, 50 1.4, 85 1.8, 100 2.0, 135 2.0, Sigma 150 Macro, 580 EXII, Yongou 560-II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 01, 2013 08:25 | #11 rmt3rd wrote in post #15886008 You are looking at the 2nd pic. The OP must have taken down the original. Oh, I saw roni's second post only saying "remove" and I didn't understand. Yeah, the second pic looks better without the fog. 500px Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MartinDixon Slit-scan project master  More info | May 01, 2013 09:18 | #12 Avoid editing old posts without very good reason, otherwise it ends up very confusing. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 01, 2013 09:30 | #13 Martin Dixon wrote in post #15886388 Avoid editing old posts without very good reason, otherwise it ends up very confusing. Yeah, and then we can't see the progression the pic has taken after critique is given. 500px Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Numenorean Cream of the Crop 5,013 posts Likes: 28 Joined Feb 2011 More info | May 01, 2013 12:45 | #14 |
May 01, 2013 13:28 | #15 Ya, not my best - tossed it. Here are some other pics from the same shoot that I think worked out better: Numenorean wrote in post #15887064 There is no photo so I'll just assume it was horrid.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1625 guests, 142 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
