Pretty straightforward poll.
You are forced to pick one but you can bash more things in text below 
| POLL: "What problem bothers you the most?" |
 Lack of center sharpness | 37 26.8% |
| Lack of non-center sharpness | 10 7.2% |
| Chromatic aberrations | 17 12.3% |
| Distortions (barrel etc) | 5 3.6% |
| Lack of contrast | 6 4.3% |
| Flares showing up too often | 3 2.2% |
| Slow AF | 35 25.4% |
| Noisy background blur | 2 1.4% |
| Cat-eyed or hexagon background blur or bloom | 2 1.4% |
| Colors come out meh | 7 5.1% |
| Zoom creep | 5 3.6% |
| Focus changes as you zoom | 4 2.9% |
| Sound or handling problems | 2 1.4% |
| Vignetting | 3 2.2% |
uOpt Goldmember  2,283 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Boston, MA, USA More info | May 01, 2013 13:36 | #1 Pretty straightforward poll. My imagine composition sucks. I need a heavier lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | May 01, 2013 13:37 | #2 The price. I have a desperate need for a 200 F2 L and funds for a nifty.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gasrocks Cream of the Crop  13,432 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA More info | May 01, 2013 13:56 | #3 People who start polls asking what is wrong with the lenses I have that I love. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I voted for handling problem as I love the output from the Tokina 50-135 2.8 but absolutely loathe the non-removable tripod collar. R6 | R7 | 15-85is | Rokinon 14 2.8 | RF 16 2.8 | 16-35 F4is L | RF 24-105 F4is L | RF 70-200 F4is L | 100-400 II L | Σ150-600 C | 1.4X III | 2X III | 430ex |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nightdiver13 Unabashed nerd!  2,272 posts Likes: 38 Joined May 2010 Location: Bigfoot Country More info | May 01, 2013 13:57 | #5 The size and weight of high quality ones. — Neil
LOG IN TO REPLY |
schlagle Senior Member  571 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2012 Location: San Francisco Bay Area More info | May 01, 2013 14:01 | #6 The color white. It's bad enough I've got a big a** lens on my camera. Did Canon really have to make it white so it stands out like crazy? 5D Mark III | EF 50 ƒ/1.4, EF 24-105L ƒ/4, EF 70-200L ƒ/2.8 IS II, EF 16-35L ƒ/2.8 II, MP-E65, EF 100L ƒ/2.8 IS Macro | 600EX-RT, 320EX, MT-24EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BrickR Cream of the Crop 5,935 posts Likes: 115 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Dallas TX More info | May 01, 2013 14:39 | #7 Price My junk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Perfect_10 Goldmember  1,998 posts Likes: 7 Joined Aug 2004 Location: An Ex Brit living in Alberta, Canada More info | May 01, 2013 14:42 | #8 |
May 01, 2013 14:45 | #9 I deliberately didn't add weight, size, price and color choices. Too easy targets My imagine composition sucks. I need a heavier lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GlennNK Goldmember  4,630 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Victoria, BC More info | May 01, 2013 14:49 | #10 Hmmm, no choice for "none". When did voluptuous become voluminous?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MTStringer Goldmember  4,652 posts Likes: 6 Joined May 2006 Location: Channelview, Tx More info | May 01, 2013 15:10 | #11 My lenses are tack sharp, work as advertised, and they are white so people don't mistake it for a NOKIN.  Image hosted by forum (647363) © MT Stringer [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.  Image hosted by forum (647364) © MT Stringer [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GoodEye906 Member 238 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2012 More info | May 01, 2013 15:14 | #12 Looks like I'm in the minority here... I voted non center sharpness. - Joe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 01, 2013 17:07 | #13 My vote goes to Contrast. I used a 50f1/.4 wide open at a wedding. Most stupid thing I have done. There was almost no contrast in there. Contrast makes the photo good or bad for me for most of the times. One of the worst lenses out there 75-300III doesn't have any contrast too. 5DII + 6D | 16-35/4.0L IS | Σ35/1.4A | 40/2.8 | Σ85/1.4A | 70-200/2.8L IS II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 01, 2013 17:09 | #14 Having to constantly change them out Shooting photos never killed anyone,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tmuussoni Senior Member 330 posts Likes: 4 Joined Oct 2011 Location: .FI More info | May 01, 2013 17:22 | #15 schlagle wrote in post #15887331  The color white. It's bad enough I've got a big a** lens on my camera. Did Canon really have to make it white so it stands out like crazy? +1. Oh how I wish they were available in black
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is EBiffany 1597 guests, 95 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
