Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 04 May 2013 (Saturday) 16:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Protection filter + lee grad filters

 
AndyWahl
Member
Avatar
38 posts
Joined Nov 2012
     
May 04, 2013 16:31 |  #1

Maybe a noob question but I was wondering if you can use the cheap 5 dollar tiffen UV protection filters in combination with the square lee filters.

On their site it shows that it has an adapter ring to connect the filter holder to the lens so Im guessing you cannot have a protection filter on at the same time?

Im looking for some kind of lens protection that I dont have to put on and take off every time I want to use the lee filters is this even possible or what are the other options?


http://andywahl.wordpr​ess.com (external link) l Flickr l (external link) 5∞ (external link) l Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4607
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
May 04, 2013 16:39 |  #2

You can, but I'd recommend taking that Tiffen filter off anyhow as they've been known to hurt IQ.
I normally will have a CPL on the lens and then attach my filter holder to it's outside threads. Unless your UV filter is a thin mount it should have a threaded front for stacking filters.


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RobDickinson
Goldmember
4,003 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 1053
Joined Apr 2010
Location: New Zealand
     
May 04, 2013 16:47 |  #3

Just leave the protection filter off. They dont actually protect anything and often cause more damage.


www.HeroWorkshops.com (external link) - www.rjd.co.nz (external link) - www.zarphag.com (external link)
Gear: A7r, 6D, Irix 15mmf2.4 , canon 16-35f4L, Canon 24mm TS-E f3.5 mk2, Sigma 50mm art, 70-200f2.8L, 400L. Lee filters, iOptron IPano, Emotimo TB3, Markins, Feisol, Novoflex, Sirui. etc.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jimewall
Goldmember
1,871 posts
Likes: 11
Joined May 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
May 04, 2013 16:49 |  #4

AndyWahl wrote in post #15897647 (external link)
Maybe a noob question but I was wondering if you can use the cheap 5 dollar tiffen UV protection filters in combination with the square lee filters.

On their site it shows that it has an adapter ring to connect the filter holder to the lens so Im guessing you cannot have a protection filter on at the same time?

Im looking for some kind of lens protection that I dont have to put on and take off every time I want to use the lee filters is this even possible or what are the other options?

You will get a lot of people on this site that will say skip any filter as a protector. If you do choose to use a protective filter, almost nobody will suggest a cheapo filter, as it will make adversely affect the IQ of a lens. If you are going to use a protective filter get a top filter like the higher end Hoya or B+W.

As for the Lee filter system, there are adapter rings you get for the size filter thread, then the filter holder goes on the adapter. So as long your filter has threads (most do, but some thin versions do not) and everything is not so far forward that you get too much vignetting - the system will work with a protective filter.


Thanks for Reading & Good Luck - Jim
GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AndyWahl
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
38 posts
Joined Nov 2012
     
May 04, 2013 17:05 |  #5

RobDickinson wrote in post #15897687 (external link)
Just leave the protection filter off. They dont actually protect anything and often cause more damage.

Damage how?

I just cant fathom getting a scratch or chip from a rock or debris on a $2000 lens as I will be shooting things such as cars or action sports or some kind of sand while doing landscape photos


http://andywahl.wordpr​ess.com (external link) l Flickr l (external link) 5∞ (external link) l Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,401 posts
Gallery: 111 photos
Likes: 517
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan / South Carolina
     
May 04, 2013 17:13 |  #6

AndyWahl wrote in post #15897730 (external link)
Damage how?

I just cant fathom getting a scratch or chip from a rock or debris on a $2000 lens as I will be shooting things such as cars or action sports or some kind of sand while doing landscape photos

So you would instead put a cheap, low quality $5 filter on a $2,000 lens? That defeats the purpose of buying a high quality lens.


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4607
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
May 04, 2013 17:14 |  #7

AndyWahl wrote in post #15897730 (external link)
Damage how?

I just cant fathom getting a scratch or chip from a rock or debris on a $2000 lens as I will be shooting things such as cars or action sports or some kind of sand while doing landscape photos

The UV filter will break faster than your lens will chip, and when it does it will scratch the bejeebus out of your lens. http://www.youtube.com …er_embedded&v=v​zOLbMPe0u8 (external link)


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RobDickinson
Goldmember
4,003 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 1053
Joined Apr 2010
Location: New Zealand
     
May 04, 2013 17:39 |  #8

Yes. FIlters break much easier than lenses and that broken sharp glass can scratch your lens. Also the damaged filter thread can get stuck on your lens requiring a tricky removal that can cause further damage.


www.HeroWorkshops.com (external link) - www.rjd.co.nz (external link) - www.zarphag.com (external link)
Gear: A7r, 6D, Irix 15mmf2.4 , canon 16-35f4L, Canon 24mm TS-E f3.5 mk2, Sigma 50mm art, 70-200f2.8L, 400L. Lee filters, iOptron IPano, Emotimo TB3, Markins, Feisol, Novoflex, Sirui. etc.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogloff
Cream of the Crop
7,606 posts
Likes: 416
Joined Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
     
May 04, 2013 21:06 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

RobDickinson wrote in post #15897810 (external link)
Yes. FIlters break much easier than lenses and that broken sharp glass can scratch your lens. Also the damaged filter thread can get stuck on your lens requiring a tricky removal that can cause further damage.

There are definite conditions under which a protection filter is useful. I shoot a lot of rodeos up close and rocks are flying when the animals are close. I've broken a few UV filters in my time by flying rocks. Guaranteed these rocks would have at the very least put a nick into my lens and at the worst, cracked the lens.

I also use a UV filter in the desert with a lot of fine blowing sand that gets stuck to the filter. I quickly replace the UV filter with another and keep on shooting without having to carefully clean a front element. The same goes for shooting at the ocean with a lot of blowing sea mist. Just change the UV filter and keep on shooting.

Lots of uses for the UV filter.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tomme
Goldmember
Avatar
1,263 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Norway
     
May 05, 2013 01:05 as a reply to  @ Hogloff's post |  #10

wow!, 5 dollar filter infront of a 2000 dollar lense! Its like : your got yourself a new ferrai with a V12 engine, you rip out the engine and replace It with a ford fiesta 1.2L engine :D


Flickr (external link)
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RobDickinson
Goldmember
4,003 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 1053
Joined Apr 2010
Location: New Zealand
     
May 05, 2013 01:28 |  #11

Hogloff wrote in post #15898278 (external link)
There are definite conditions under which a protection filter is useful. I shoot a lot of rodeos up close and rocks are flying when the animals are close. I've broken a few UV filters in my time by flying rocks. Guaranteed these rocks would have at the very least put a nick into my lens and at the worst, cracked the lens.

I also use a UV filter in the desert with a lot of fine blowing sand that gets stuck to the filter. I quickly replace the UV filter with another and keep on shooting without having to carefully clean a front element. The same goes for shooting at the ocean with a lot of blowing sea mist. Just change the UV filter and keep on shooting.

Lots of uses for the UV filter.

Yes,I'll admit there are some times when you may want to use a filter. Make sure its a decent one though!


www.HeroWorkshops.com (external link) - www.rjd.co.nz (external link) - www.zarphag.com (external link)
Gear: A7r, 6D, Irix 15mmf2.4 , canon 16-35f4L, Canon 24mm TS-E f3.5 mk2, Sigma 50mm art, 70-200f2.8L, 400L. Lee filters, iOptron IPano, Emotimo TB3, Markins, Feisol, Novoflex, Sirui. etc.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
May 05, 2013 01:34 |  #12

Hogloff wrote in post #15898278 (external link)
There are definite conditions under which a protection filter is useful. I shoot a lot of rodeos up close and rocks are flying when the animals are close. I've broken a few UV filters in my time by flying rocks. Guaranteed these rocks would have at the very least put a nick into my lens and at the worst, cracked the lens.

I also use a UV filter in the desert with a lot of fine blowing sand that gets stuck to the filter. I quickly replace the UV filter with another and keep on shooting without having to carefully clean a front element. The same goes for shooting at the ocean with a lot of blowing sea mist. Just change the UV filter and keep on shooting.

Lots of uses for the UV filter.

but let's be honest...you can't guarantee that the rocks would effect the front element at all...

show me one instance where a rock did damage to a front element...and not a dropped lens...but an actual rock hitting it...or sand hitting it, and causing a scratch, chip, crack...anything...

protection filters are for peace of mind...they don't guarantee anything...but they make people feel better...if you need one, get a good one...don't get a cheap one


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
May 05, 2013 08:04 |  #13

DreDaze wrote in post #15898804 (external link)
protection filters are for peace of mind

Actually, I thought they were for generting a living for camera shop salesmen -

"OK, sir has made an excellent decision to purchase the $2000 super-dooper lens (thinks: On which I make $10 profit). Now sir really needs to protect his investment with a good quality protective filter. This one is only $50 and, as sir can see, is digital! (Yeah, that should be $45 profit for me.)"


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogloff
Cream of the Crop
7,606 posts
Likes: 416
Joined Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
     
May 05, 2013 09:52 |  #14
bannedPermanent ban

DreDaze wrote in post #15898804 (external link)
but let's be honest...you can't guarantee that the rocks would effect the front element at all...

show me one instance where a rock did damage to a front element...and not a dropped lens...but an actual rock hitting it...or sand hitting it, and causing a scratch, chip, crack...anything...

protection filters are for peace of mind...they don't guarantee anything...but they make people feel better...if you need one, get a good one...don't get a cheap one

A rock that cracks a filter would definitely at the very least scratch the front element. I cannot show you since I used a protection filter in these conditions to actually protect the lens.

I've seen fine scratches on many lens most likely caused by trying to clean the glass when there were fine dust or even sand on the glass.

If you don't shoot in harsh environments then you don't need a protection filter. If you do shoot in environments that can cause damage, I suggest using them. Of course each has to determine their own risk tolerance.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blanex1
Senior Member
Avatar
790 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2012
     
May 05, 2013 11:52 |  #15

RobDickinson wrote in post #15897687 (external link)
Just leave the protection filter off. They dont actually protect anything and often cause more damage.

you ever seen lens for sale on this sight!some of them have a nick or scuff marks on there front element ,gess why,no lens filter,if you keep the filer clean they do not degrade the photo in any way.


canon 7d bg-e7 5d-mk3 1d-mk3 24-105-L 17-40 L 35/1.4 85/1.8 yougnuo 565 ex 580 ex and lots of other canon stuff.canon 70-200 2.8 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,936 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Protection filter + lee grad filters
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
587 guests, 148 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.