Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 05 May 2013 (Sunday) 09:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Computer-screen VS Mobile phone-screen

 
Bonbridge
Goldmember
Avatar
1,265 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 424
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Netherlands
     
May 05, 2013 09:09 |  #1

I am working on a pretty good laptop at home with a pretty good screen. But always when I see some pictures from my mobile phone (Samsung Galaxy S3) the pics looks soooo much nicer. The contrast, blacks and the colors looks waaaay better.
I am sure my laptop screen is not bad at all and doesn't need any calibration.

Am I the only one who find the pictures looking way better on there mobile device? Are there extern monitors which will produce the same quality as our phones? I know a phone has smaller pixels etc. but that's not the only thing what makes te pictures pop on the phone.

I am curious if you experience the same.


5DII + 6D | 16-35/4.0L IS | Σ35/1.4A | 40/2.8 | Σ85/1.4A | 70-200/2.8L IS II
iMac Retina 5k | i7 | 24Gb RAM | 512GB Flash | 4GB M295X

Website (external link) | flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
May 05, 2013 10:41 |  #2

Bonbridge wrote in post #15899392 (external link)
I am sure my laptop screen is not bad at all and doesn't need any calibration.

I have never seen a video system that couldn't be improved by proper calibration. You'll never know about yours unless you actually calibrate it with a good colorimeter.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4607
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
May 05, 2013 10:49 |  #3

I can't imagine that your laptop wouldn't benefit from calibration. Having both a Galaxy SII and a Note II, I know what you're talking about. The phones tend to saturate images to within an inch of their lives. The LED screens tend to be pretty good with blacks as well. The phones also tend to be a bit brighter too.
If you want to view your images as accurately as possible you need a quality monitor geared towards imaging (NEC, Lacie, Eizo) and it needs to be properly calibrated.


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lennartsw
Member
105 posts
Joined Mar 2013
     
May 06, 2013 00:28 |  #4

Laptops tend to a blue color fault, which makes most images look sad while phones add contrast. You also have to change settings like luminance, gamma, the white point and things like that. But a calibration program will do this automatically.. It all depends on in which room you are working and what color the reflexions have that your room produces. And while looking at your photos you should wear a black shirt.


Sorry for my bad English
5DIII, 7D, Samyang 14 2.8, Canon 17-40 4L, Canon 28 1.8, Zeiss 50 1.4, Canon 85 1.2L II, Canon 100 2.8L, Canon 100-400L 4.5-5.6

Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Colorblinded
Goldmember
Avatar
2,713 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 724
Joined Jul 2007
     
May 06, 2013 00:43 |  #5

Your phone is juicing the colors and contrast, so of course it pops more. That doesn't make it right, or your laptop right. You won't know unless you've calibrated both. A screen without calibration is just a guessing game.


http://www.colorblinde​dphoto.com (external link)
http://www.thecolorbli​ndphotographer.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bonbridge
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,265 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 424
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Netherlands
     
May 06, 2013 06:17 |  #6

I have checked the calibration settings and it all looked good to me. I haven't checked anything with some kind of program though.

I am now looking at some monitors where I am somewhat interested in. I will buy a calibration software thing with it if I am going to buy one. I am now looking at the following monitors:

Dell Ultrasharp U2713H Black €698
Dell Ultrasharp U2711 Black €548
NEC Multisync PA271W Black €1088


5DII + 6D | 16-35/4.0L IS | Σ35/1.4A | 40/2.8 | Σ85/1.4A | 70-200/2.8L IS II
iMac Retina 5k | i7 | 24Gb RAM | 512GB Flash | 4GB M295X

Website (external link) | flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
May 06, 2013 07:18 |  #7

Bonbridge wrote in post #15902164 (external link)
I have checked the calibration settings and it all looked good to me.

Whatever you may have looked at cannot possibly make sure the white point, black point, and colors are correct on your monitor.

You need a calibration package that includes not only software but a sensor that is used to "see" the monitor while the monitor is being driven through a range of colors. After analysis with the sensor, the software makes a set of corrections and the system again analyzes all of the colors and intensities.

I have an NEC PA231W with the optional calibration package and this package really works well.

The optional calibration package for the PA271W is the SVII-PRO-KIT.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mystik610
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,076 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 12356
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Houston, TX
     
May 06, 2013 10:11 |  #8

Bonbridge wrote in post #15899392 (external link)
I am working on a pretty good laptop at home with a pretty good screen. But always when I see some pictures from my mobile phone (Samsung Galaxy S3) the pics looks soooo much nicer. The contrast, blacks and the colors looks waaaay better.
I am sure my laptop screen is not bad at all and doesn't need any calibration.

Am I the only one who find the pictures looking way better on there mobile device? Are there extern monitors which will produce the same quality as our phones? I know a phone has smaller pixels etc. but that's not the only thing what makes te pictures pop on the phone.

I am curious if you experience the same.

The Samsung Galaxy SIII has an AMOLED display, which is a technology that offers significantly better black levels, contrast, and viewing angles than a traditional LCD. LCD's have a distinct disadvantage of relying on edge or backlights to illuminate the display, and you inevitibly have 'light bleed' that reduces the contrast and black levels of the display. Even very expensive LCD's backlit by an array of RGB LED's are subject to this. This is in stark contrast to AMOLED and Plasma displays, in which each pixel is individually illuminated.

The OLED displays is a significant technological leap over the old LCD displays that make-up most monitors today. We're just now starting to see larger panel OLED TV's hitting the market this year, and will probably start seeing OLED monitors sometime in the near future as well.


focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
α7ʀIV - α7ʀIII
Sigma 14-24 f2.8 ART - Zeiss Loxia 21 - Sigma 35 f1.2 ART - Sony 35 1.8 - Sony/Zeiss 55 1.8 - Sony 85GM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,574 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Computer-screen VS Mobile phone-screen
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1287 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.