Scioto River, Columbus

CAL Imagery wrote in post #15931044
I put WMs on photos for security. Ostensibly they need to be distracting (as in, keeping the photo from being stolen -- putting a small WM on a corner won't stop people from cropping it out) enough to prevent theft. The WM has little to nothing to do with the color, exposure, composition, etc., of the photograph. I'm asking for critiques of that, not of the WM.

That's the whole thing, it does, and in the case of this picture the part where the WM is is useless to the composition.

And no offense intented but what makes you think all of your photos are worth stealing?

Also, with about 20 min worth of work I could make your WM dissapear in most cases anyway, especially in this photo, so again why?

Free marketing as well.

CAL Imagery wrote in post #15928227
I've been here for a long time. There's a lot more going on here than a lot of other Nikon sites. Plus, critiquing is agnostic.

I really dislike the image. It has such a Nikon feel to it..


Juuuust kidding. It's a nice, simple, pretty shot. I like it.

CAL Imagery wrote in post #15933452
Free marketing as well.

Yup, those 35 facebook followers, were a result of the WM

tmoore323 wrote in post #15936428
Yup, those 35 facebook followers, were a result of the WM

Do you seriously have to go there and make things personal? You've had a problem from the beginning (yeah, bring up that I shoot with a Nikon, even though I only have one thing made by them and have been here years longer than you). Add something helpful or leave, please. Apparently something rubbed you the wrong way from the get-go.

I may grab a bag of popcorn and stay awhile