Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 09 May 2013 (Thursday) 16:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Tack sharp to soft as a wet noodle, lens or operator error?

 
JJD.Photography
Goldmember
1,484 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 113
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
     
May 09, 2013 16:45 |  #1

Whenever I am shooting (birds - most of the time perched) my keeper rate is pretty low. The images are either tack sharp or not. Even during a series of say 10 shots of the same bird in the same spot I may get several keepers or I may end up deleting them all due to not being sharp.

BUT, having images from the lens that are tack sharp I can only think if the lens has done it once, it can do it everytime. I know lighting, stillness of the bird, press of the shutter, steadiness of the camera, exposure, all have a big part in the difference with the outcome of a shot. I am generally shooting the birds at 500mm with this lens (Tamron 200-500 on a 50D) so I can't really compare it to my 70-200. Does it seem to be operator error or must every element be in line to get the perfect shot?

Hopefully this makes sense. Thanks for any input :cool:


His And Her Photographs (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saint728
Goldmember
Avatar
2,892 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Honolulu Hawaii
     
May 09, 2013 16:57 |  #2

If your taking pictures from the same spot and same subject then I can only assume it is operator error as the camera should be able to take the same sharp picture over and over again. Are you shooting in manual mode? If not your camera could be changing your settings based on lighting conditions.

Take Care,
Cheers, Patirck


Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III | 17-40mm f/4.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro | 300mm f/4.0L IS
Click Here To See My Gear
Click here to see my Flickr (external link)
http://www.runryder.co​m/helicopter/gallery/9​019/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saint728
Goldmember
Avatar
2,892 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Honolulu Hawaii
     
May 09, 2013 16:58 |  #3

Do you have a couple of samples of one in focus and one that is not?

Take Care,
Cheers, Patrick


Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III | 17-40mm f/4.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro | 300mm f/4.0L IS
Click Here To See My Gear
Click here to see my Flickr (external link)
http://www.runryder.co​m/helicopter/gallery/9​019/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
May 09, 2013 18:13 as a reply to  @ Saint728's post |  #4

What focus mode are you using? If using one shot, and maybe having a slight pause between locking focus and taking the shot, slight movements can be enough to move the bird from in focus, to "somewhere within the DOF" to "out of focus. It may only take a slight breeze to move the branch, or even a slight movement forwards or backwards by the photographer, to turn a tack sharp shot into a soft one.

What are your shutter speeds like? They can make a noticeable difference too, even if you are locked down on a tripod. With long lenses you still need to keep the speed up in order that any motion in the subject is frozen. Again, a perch moving gently in the breeze may not be obvious when looking at the subject, but may be enough to soften the image if the motion isn't counteracted with a fast enough shutter speed.

Either of those could easily be the cause of variation from tack sharp to soft between shots in a sequence, and other potential errors too.

As has been suggested, post some shots (with exif intact) and we can possibly get a better idea of potential causes.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JJD.Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,484 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 113
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
     
May 09, 2013 20:18 |  #5

Saint728 wrote in post #15915786 (external link)
If your taking pictures from the same spot and same subject then I can only assume it is operator error as the camera should be able to take the same sharp picture over and over again. Are you shooting in manual mode?

Usually shoot in AV mode. If not AV, TV. On a tripod (ballhead unlocked) when out in the field or rested on the window sill in the same spot when backyard shooting.

Saint728 wrote in post #15915788 (external link)
Do you have a couple of samples of one in focus and one that is not?

Take Care,
Cheers, Patrick

I'm going to work on getting one of each. I delete all the images that are not sharp, so will post next time I shoot.

sandpiper wrote in post #15915989 (external link)
What focus mode are you using?

Center focus point, AI Servo, Back button focusing (BBF). At times I will refocus in between shots or continuous focus (or not) during a burst.

sandpiper wrote in post #15915989 (external link)
If using one shot, and maybe having a slight pause between locking focus and taking the shot, slight movements can be enough to move the bird from in focus, to "somewhere within the DOF" to "out of focus. It may only take a slight breeze to move the branch, or even a slight movement forwards or backwards by the photographer, to turn a tack sharp shot into a soft one.

This is why I shoot AI Servo, use BBF and most of the time continuously focus.

sandpiper wrote in post #15915989 (external link)
What are your shutter speeds like? They can make a noticeable difference too, even if you are locked down on a tripod.

That is another thing that really boggles me. I would of never thought a slow shutter speed & wide open would capture one of my sharpest images (1/60 wide open @ 6.3, 500mm, ISO400) with this lens. Of course the lens was resting on the window sill:

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8118/8699758942_7d965dfedc_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …d_photography/8​699758942/  (external link)
Female cardinal (external link) by HisAndHerPhotographs.c​om (external link), on Flickr

Then I have shots on well lit days at 1/800 of a second that are not sharp using the same window sill technique.

sandpiper wrote in post #15915989 (external link)
With long lenses you still need to keep the speed up in order that any motion in the subject is frozen. Again, a perch moving gently in the breeze may not be obvious when looking at the subject, but may be enough to soften the image if the motion isn't counteracted with a fast enough shutter speed.

Either of those could easily be the cause of variation from tack sharp to soft between shots in a sequence, and other potential errors too.

As has been suggested, post some shots (with exif intact) and we can possibly get a better idea of potential causes.

I've got to figure out why LR4 is not exporting with the EXIF data. Thanks to all for all the information :cool:

I'm going to post sharp and soft examples next time I shoot.


His And Her Photographs (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3429
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
May 09, 2013 21:56 |  #6

don't save for web if you want exif data to remain intact...

if you're talking a small percentage of keepers, I'd have to guess that it's the person behind the lens


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Spats139
Senior Member
Avatar
412 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 88
Joined Jan 2009
Location: LMD, BC, CA
     
May 09, 2013 22:40 as a reply to  @ DreDaze's post |  #7

Have you ever tried setting up a shot of a static object with everything in manual, using a remote release (or timer), and then taken a series of images while locked down on your tripod? If everything is exactly the same with your settings, and you take you out of the picture, it should let you know whether it's equipment or operator.


Dale

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
killwilly
Senior Member
Avatar
866 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 58
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Lincolnshire, UK.
     
May 10, 2013 01:35 as a reply to  @ Spats139's post |  #8

Are you sure you disable the IS when using a tripod, or supported on a window sill? This can make a difference.


Alan. flickr (external link)
---------------
Canon 7D. Canon 15-85 EF-S Lens. Canon 55-250 EF-S Lens. Speedlite 430ex 11.
Canon EOS-M. Canon 18-55 EF-M Lens. Speedlite 90EX.
Sigma APO 150-500mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Neilyb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,200 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 546
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Munich
     
May 10, 2013 03:54 |  #9

AI Servo by its very nature will focus where it thinks is right and any slight movements will push it back or forwards depending on where you point it, slightest movements will mean focus differences shot for shot. Dont forget small animals move all the time, heart beats, beak muscle movements, nothing will ever be perfectly sharp unless shooting 1/8000sec all the time.


http://natureimmortal.​blogspot.com (external link)

http://www.natureimmor​tal.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ETS
Senior Member
Avatar
755 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 666
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Cocoa, Florida
     
May 10, 2013 07:48 |  #10

Neilyb wrote in post #15917276 (external link)
AI Servo by its very nature will focus where it thinks is right and any slight movements will push it back or forwards depending on where you point it, slightest movements will mean focus differences shot for shot. Dont forget small animals move all the time, heart beats, beak muscle movements, nothing will ever be perfectly sharp unless shooting 1/8000sec all the time.

This.

Small birds are especially jittery. It's a must for their survival. I find the OP's experience to be pretty much normal.


Fuji X-T2,5D MKII,Rebel XTi
17-40L, 70-200 F4L, 400mm F5.6L, 100mm F2.8L, Sigma 35mm f1.4 Art
580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Preeb
Goldmember
Avatar
2,663 posts
Gallery: 150 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1258
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Logan County, CO
     
May 10, 2013 07:51 as a reply to  @ Neilyb's post |  #11

I wonder.... if neither you nor the subject moves, it would seem to make sense to me to just focus once and let off the button until something changes. I use AI Servo with BBF too, and though I don't shoot birds much, I will use the method I just described when I have a relatively static subject - chimp the first shot to be sure of exposure and focus, then try not to change anything unless my subject moves.


Rick
6D Mark II - EF 17-40 f4 L -- EF 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro -- EF 70-200 f4 L IS w/1.4 II TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Foggiest
Senior Member
584 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2012
     
May 10, 2013 13:10 |  #12

AI Servo by its very nature will focus where it thinks is right and any slight movements will push it back or forwards depending on where you point it, slightest movements will mean focus differences shot for shot. Dont forget small animals move all the time, heart beats, beak muscle movements, nothing will ever be perfectly sharp unless shooting 1/8000sec all the time.

ETS wrote in post #15917629 (external link)
This.

Small birds are especially jittery. It's a must for their survival. I find the OP's experience to be pretty much normal.

So , the OP underestimated the impact of small DOF ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ETS
Senior Member
Avatar
755 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 666
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Cocoa, Florida
     
May 10, 2013 14:19 |  #13

Foggiest wrote in post #15918604 (external link)
So , the OP underestimated the impact of small DOF ?

You know, that's a very good question. Though I don't usually think about it that way. In terms of DOF I'm usually concerned about HOW MUCH of the bird is in focus. But yes, if you have a very thin DOF, a quick moving bird can very easily slip in and out of your focal plane.


Fuji X-T2,5D MKII,Rebel XTi
17-40L, 70-200 F4L, 400mm F5.6L, 100mm F2.8L, Sigma 35mm f1.4 Art
580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sebring5
Member
67 posts
Joined Mar 2013
     
May 10, 2013 16:47 |  #14

I shoot birds and have a 25% to 50% keeper rate. I use program which controls the shutter speeds and aperture size. I use spot metering, center focus point only, A1 Servo, no IS and all hand held. Lens are Zeiss 135mm/2 EF (manual focus), Canon 200mm/2.8 and Canon 400mm/5.6, I use Photoshop with Camera Raw plug in which does keep all the photograph information when converting to jpg for the web. It is far better than Lightbox. So far as I can see it is all a question of focus and distance, recognizing when the subject is in focus and range then pulling the trigger accordingly. I'm getting better at it. I may try changing to single shot only.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ F ­ stops ­ here
Goldmember
Avatar
2,061 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Sep 2012
Location: San Jose, Ca
     
May 10, 2013 23:35 |  #15

I'd say my keeper rate is in the 30-40% range as well, i've found shooting in Av with spot metering and center point focus and AI servo to be the most beneficial of all the settings i've tried, i mess around with the ISO a lot to keep my shutter speed up, i also found shooting is burst mode has helped yield more keepers (3 shot burst i usually get 1 out of 3 spot on)

Definitely agree with ETS on small birds being jittery since i mainly shoot finches and sparrows, they move quick and this equates to a lot of missed shots. An example of a 3 burst shot where only one nailed the mark...

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7281/8715746192_13acd81d6e_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/lenzfreak/87157​46192/  (external link)
Bird23 (external link) by LenzFreak (external link), on Flickr

I've found patience and experimentation to be my best friend

JD
Talent will get you far, but not as far as ambition
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/lenzfreak/ (external link)
Smugmug-primefocus.smugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,017 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Tack sharp to soft as a wet noodle, lens or operator error?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1136 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.