Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 10 May 2013 (Friday) 10:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

16-35 I vs 16-35 II

 
Tapeman
Sliced Bread
Avatar
3,723 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 124
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Twin Cities
     
May 10, 2013 10:58 |  #1

I have owned the 16-35 f/2.8L I for years. I just bought the 16-35 f/2.8L II.

I'm going to keep the new one although it is a tough decision. I took shots with both lenses @ 16mm 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, and 22. Then I took shots @ 35mm using the same f/ stops. All tripod mounted @ ISO 100.

I frankly don't know if the ver. II is worth $500. more than the ver. I. ( and the CP cost over $100. more.)

At f/2.8 the edges are a bit softer on the ver. I, but at f/11, 16, and 22 The difference is minimal.

I plan to get the TS-E 17 to use when I have the luxury of time to putz around but will probably use the 16-35 mostly for quick shots or travel.

Am I crazy?


Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
Gitzo 1228, 1275, 1558, Lensbaby 3G. Epson 3880, Bags that match my shoes.:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yogi ­ Bear
Goldmember
1,492 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2009
Location: League City, TX USA (Houston)
     
May 10, 2013 18:14 |  #2

Tapeman wrote in post #15918198 (external link)
I have owned the 16-35 f/2.8L I for years. I just bought the 16-35 f/2.8L II.

I'm going to keep the new one although it is a tough decision. I took shots with both lenses @ 16mm 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, and 22. Then I took shots @ 35mm using the same f/ stops. All tripod mounted @ ISO 100.

I frankly don't know if the ver. II is worth $500. more than the ver. I. ( and the CP cost over $100. more.)

At f/2.8 the edges are a bit softer on the ver. I, but at f/11, 16, and 22 The difference is minimal.

I plan to get the TS-E 17 to use when I have the luxury of time to putz around but will probably use the 16-35 mostly for quick shots or travel.

Am I crazy?

I think that it depends on what you plan to shoot with it. If you're doing landscapes and corner to corner sharpness is important, then the ver II is the one to have. OTOH, if you will be using the TS-E 17 as your preferred landscape lens, and the 16-35 would be for "snapshots", the sharpness of the ver II would not be nearly as important and the ver. I should suffice.


Canon EOS 7D | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS |
EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM | 250D | EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM | 580 EX II |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
May 10, 2013 18:25 |  #3

If you're going to be stopping down, and if you're getting the TS-E, I'd just stick with v1. I only use the 16-35 at 2.8 most of the time, so the II is much better for my needs.

However, the 17 TS-E will make you want to throw the 16-35 in the garbage when you look at sharpness, even wide open. It's an incredible lens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kouasupra
Goldmember
2,800 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 828
Joined May 2008
Location: Fresno/Clovis, CA
     
May 10, 2013 18:29 |  #4

Good to know. I'll be picking up a V.2 soon.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

999 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
16-35 I vs 16-35 II
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1444 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.