Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 11 May 2013 (Saturday) 17:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display-Poor Quality

 
Jasonfire124
Member
Avatar
142 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 267
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Jersey,Channel Islands
     
May 11, 2013 17:09 |  #1

I recently purchased a 2012 Thunderbolt equipped Mac Mini and had it upgraded with a 240 Gb SSD in addition to the internal hard drive. I was looking forward to getting the 27" Thunderbolt diaplay to pair it to. I finely got the money together and bought one yesterday and had to wait til last night to set it up.

WHAT A DISAPPOINTMENT !!!!!

I was taken aback when viewing it alongside my 2008 iMac 24". The 'whites' on my iMac were truly "white" as opposed to the blue hue on the new 'expensive' Thunderbolt Display. I got up this morning and switched everything back on to re evaluate what I had seen last night. On closer inspection and viewing the Mac Rumours front page, the blue tint at the top remained blue all the way from the top to bottom rather than fading to white. I then opened the Apple.Com page and could clearly see that the left hand side of the display had a serious blue hint which went to "white ish" on the far right of the screen.

I packaged it back up and returned it to the apple reseller who promptly took it to the engineers upstairs behind locked doors. Whilst I walked around the store I checked the other Displays that were 'on display' and noticed that the other 2 Thunderbolt Displays were not much better. I then glanced at the new iMac and was immediately blown away at how amazing the screen looked. The "whites' were truly "white' and their was not a hint of blue or a different hue anywhere around the screen. I fell in love with the new iMac and realised what a mistake I may have made by not just purchasing the 27" iMac in the first place.

The sales assistant shortly returned and confirmed that there was something wrong with the brand new out of the box display and offered me a refund which I took. In no time I was grabbing the attention of the other sales assistants who were almost agreeing with my findings re the Thunderbolt displays not being as good as the new iMacs and witnessing the poor light and saturation qualities of the Thunderbolt display.
So what to do know....await a new batch of Thunderbolts and try again, sell my new Mac Mini and buy an iMac, buy a Dell Monitor (although I truly want gloss believe it or not!!!)
OR
Buy a second hand 2011 27" iMac and use it as a display through the Thunderbolt ports ???
Anyone feel like I do re the Thunderbolt display and have suffered the same issues ??? Any thoughts ??
Anyone using a 2012 Mac Mini with a 2011 iMac as a Display? Would like to know your experiences with this.??


Canon 1D MKIII(SOLD), 5Dc(SOLD), Fuji X-T1, Fuji X100, 5D MKIII, 70-200 f2.8L, 85 1.8, 50 1.8II, 17-40 f4L, Sigma 35 1.4, Fuji 18-55 Kit Lens, Fuji 35mm f1.4, Fuji 55-230, Samyang 12mm f2
flickr (external link)facebook (external link)instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
projectmayhem713
Senior Member
584 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Bay Area
     
May 11, 2013 19:47 |  #2

I'm not super knowledgeable on this. however, I believe all 27" imacs are factory calibrated. There is no way to do that with a TB display. It has to be done when it is finally hooked up to its editing machine.

But the 27" imac and the 27" TB display are identical with the exception of all the computery type parts. I received my 27" imac last week and I have to say, even with the "factory calibration" it was way too bright and way too cool (blue) out of the box. I ran my old x rite eye one display on it and now it is much much better.

I would guess you just need to calibrate it.


5D2 - 24-70 f2.8L - 50 1.4 - S100
My Blogsite (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
May 11, 2013 23:51 |  #3

Did you calibrate the display with a colorimeter?


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alex_Venom
Goldmember
Avatar
1,624 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
     
May 13, 2013 08:31 |  #4

I was going to get a TBD but as I researched and read the horror stories of bad colors, some of them dying in less than 1 week of use for no apparent reason, illumination differences across the screen and many others, I decided to wait.
LG is putting out their new stuff said to compete with the Dell Ultrasharp 2713H so I hope it performs better.
The TBD is the most beautiful monitor available, but I´m more interested in IQ than looks... and for that kind of price, I´ll let this one pass...


Photography is about GEAR and not talent or practice. Practice won't make you a better photographer. Expensive equipment will. =D
"Nobody can buy a scalpel and become a doctor, but anyone can buy a camera and become a photographer."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jasonfire124
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
142 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 267
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Jersey,Channel Islands
     
May 13, 2013 15:21 |  #5

Alex_Venom wrote in post #15926880 (external link)
I was going to get a TBD but as I researched and read the horror stories of bad colors, some of them dying in less than 1 week of use for no apparent reason, illumination differences across the screen and many others, I decided to wait.
LG is putting out their new stuff said to compete with the Dell Ultrasharp 2713H so I hope it performs better.
The TBD is the most beautiful monitor available, but I´m more interested in IQ than looks... and for that kind of price, I´ll let this one pass...

Nice to hear your comments Alex. I did think for a while that I was on my own regarding these issues. Have to agree that it does look the best monitor there is but I am into sharpness and well balanced tones....oh and one should not have to ask much for the 'whites' on a £900ish display to be "whiter than white". What a let down !!!

Anyone know of any other gloss displays out there to compete with Apple?


Canon 1D MKIII(SOLD), 5Dc(SOLD), Fuji X-T1, Fuji X100, 5D MKIII, 70-200 f2.8L, 85 1.8, 50 1.8II, 17-40 f4L, Sigma 35 1.4, Fuji 18-55 Kit Lens, Fuji 35mm f1.4, Fuji 55-230, Samyang 12mm f2
flickr (external link)facebook (external link)instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCAsan
Goldmember
Avatar
3,918 posts
Likes: 88
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Atlanta
     
May 13, 2013 22:14 as a reply to  @ Jasonfire124's post |  #6

Did you read all the good stories of ATD use and all the photography monitor reviews? We have had zero problems with ours.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chrisvanbeekum
Senior Member
495 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2011
     
May 13, 2013 22:21 |  #7

same thing happened to me. i got a thunderbolt and it was vastly different to my older imac. but i read online that pretty much all of them have a cooler color cast. so i went to the store. got me a color munki . and now im a happy camper :)


5D MK II- 7D - /50 1.4 - 85 1.8 - 24 105 f4L "I WANT A 35L"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,168 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display-Poor Quality
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
518 guests, 154 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.