Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 12 May 2013 (Sunday) 08:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Any frequent flyers here?

 
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
May 12, 2013 08:34 |  #1

Hi everyone,

A recent airline trip made me realise all over again just how well the backpack works for transporting a lot of photography gear, both on location and while travelling by road and air. It's not the best for working out of, but for getting a lot of gear from one place to another, the backpack rules.

Which brings me to my question: What is the current state-of-the-art in carry-on sized photography backpacks? I am looking for a backpack that excels at transporting my gear through airports and around the world, not a backpack for trekking (which is what Lowepro seem to be designing these days). The last backpack I have purchased is the Lowepro Mini Trekker AW. It has since been discontinued, and as much as I like using it when the occasion presents itself, it is not as good for airline travel as it could be. The straps cannot be stowed away, they're always dangling around and getting caught and snagging on things. The backpack itself is not square-shaped, and therefore not as commodious as it could be, to take as much advantage of the carry-on space allocation as possible.

The one model that caught my eye is the Think Tank Photo Airport Accelerator: http://www.thinktankph​oto.com/products/a...r​ator.aspx (external link). This seems to satisfy the strictest space restrictions for carry-on luggage (as specified by some of the most infamous airlines that I know of). It looks like just what the doctor ordered, but I am wondering if there might be anything else out there, that I am not aware of, that would meet my needs even better.

To all you frequent flyers: What photography backpack do you use and why? If you had to do it all over again, would you buy the same bag or would you buy something else? What features are important to you, and what could you do without? If you do not use a backpack, why not (maybe there is a better solution that I am not aware of)?

Looking for any and all opinions!


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
May 12, 2013 08:54 |  #2

I fly quite frequently, but I don't like using flight-specific backpacks. Why?
Because they are not comfortable, nor are they convenient.

Instead, I use my F Stop Tilopa BC. Sure the straps don't come off, sure its not square. But it is rigid, holds a lot, distributes weight properly, and I'm ready to go off shooting wherever I want as soon as I get off the plane, without needing to repack or switch bags.

Features that are important to me in order of decreasing importance:
-comfort
-durability
-protection
-rear access
-carrying capacity
-modularity
-price
-looks

What I could do without?
-price
-not much else


The Tilopa actually fits exactly within the limits for major and budget airlines (not sure about domestic flights, I'm talking international), and it is slightly sloped at the top which helps it fit perfectly in the overhead bins, so despite not looking like an ugly square box, it wastes none of your allowance.

As for doing it all over again, I have actually done just that. I started off with a Lowepro Fastpack 350, which I found very uncomfortable when fully loaded and extremely inflexible in terms of configuration of the storage spaces. Got rid of that, and used an F Stop Guru for a while, which I then found too small*, so I bought an F Stop Satori EXP, which as it turns out is a bit too big for some smaller airlines (e.g. Easyjet, Malaysian airlines, Icelandair, to name a few). So I returned that, and got the F Stop Tilopa BC, which is absolutely perfect as far as I'm concerned, and I wish I'd just gotten it from the start.


*Too small for air travel, it is perfect as a daypack and hiking bag, which is what I now use it for, with the Tilopa being reserved for multi-day trips and overseas trips


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gakoenig
Senior Member
Avatar
427 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Portland, OR
     
May 12, 2013 09:14 |  #3

The other guy at Luma, Duncan, did something like 175k miles last year in air travel. Egypt. Doha. Tunisia. Singapore. Germany. France. India. London. Scotland. Burma. Cuba. Detroit, amongst others.

He absolutely swears by his Think Tank Airport. All the big gun gear goes into it (Nikon D4, 2 D3s's, 18-24, 24-70, 70-200, a 300, couple of GoPro Heros and his beloved Sony RX1), spendy ball heads and a CF card along with a Retina MacBook Pro and travel docs.

A small backpack has a change of clothes, toiletries and essentials. Long term travel outfits and other bulky stuff goes into an Eagle Creek traveler (I'm trying to get him to upgrade to the new Arc'Teryx luggage).


http://lu.ma (external link), greg@luma-labs.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick5
Goldmember
Avatar
3,385 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 409
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
     
May 12, 2013 14:25 |  #4

Rudi.
I think you answered your own question and also beat me to my reply.
The ThinkTank Airport Accelerator has been the backpack I needed for not only air travel but also for maximizing space.
Like you said, since it is square it allows me to carry two bodies with lenses attached in the upper portion of the bag. I also carry two additional lenses, two 600EX-RT flashes, two ST-E3 Transmitters and other "STUFF"
I also fly with my ThinkTank Sling-O-Matic 30 which will house all of my computer related gizmos along with a third 600 flash.
The Sling-O-Matic also is my walk around bag as this also holds both cameras attached ready to shoot.


Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TijmenDal
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
     
May 12, 2013 14:27 |  #5

I've got a F-Stopa Tilopa which I think is absolutely amazing. It's a rugged backpack for the outdoors that can be taken into the wilderniss and backcountry. If you're not going to use it in remote places but only want to use a backpack because you find it easy to carry around, look at Think Tank for sure.


//Tijmen
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/tijmendalexternal link

Gear
______________
flickrexternal link
_____________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
May 12, 2013 18:45 |  #6

I stopped carrying a backpack when I realized how heavy it was. Now I use the Pelican 1514 into which I can get the three bodies and six out of the seven lenses in my sig. I wheel it through the airport and onto the plane, and carry my Lowepro Stealth Reporter on my shoulder, filled with two Speedlites, the 50mm lens, a book and a sandwich, plus earbuds, glasses, etc. The Pelican easily fits overhead and the Stealth Reporter under my seat.

I pack a Lowepro ulitity belt and harness in checked luggage for walking around in cities, or the Stealth Reporter. I also pack the Classified 140 for the evenings.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Preeb
Goldmember
Avatar
2,665 posts
Gallery: 151 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1266
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Logan County, CO
     
May 12, 2013 20:59 |  #7

Rudi wrote in post #15923927 (external link)
Hi everyone,

A recent airline trip made me realise all over again just how well the backpack works for transporting a lot of photography gear, both on location and while travelling by road and air. It's not the best for working out of, but for getting a lot of gear from one place to another, the backpack rules.

Which brings me to my question: What is the current state-of-the-art in carry-on sized photography backpacks? I am looking for a backpack that excels at transporting my gear through airports and around the world, not a backpack for trekking (which is what Lowepro seem to be designing these days). The last backpack I have purchased is the Lowepro Mini Trekker AW. It has since been discontinued, and as much as I like using it when the occasion presents itself, it is not as good for airline travel as it could be. The straps cannot be stowed away, they're always dangling around and getting caught and snagging on things. The backpack itself is not square-shaped, and therefore not as commodious as it could be, to take as much advantage of the carry-on space allocation as possible.

The one model that caught my eye is the Think Tank Photo Airport Accelerator: http://www.thinktankph​oto.com/products/a...r​ator.aspx (external link). This seems to satisfy the strictest space restrictions for carry-on luggage (as specified by some of the most infamous airlines that I know of). It looks like just what the doctor ordered, but I am wondering if there might be anything else out there, that I am not aware of, that would meet my needs even better.

To all you frequent flyers: What photography backpack do you use and why? If you had to do it all over again, would you buy the same bag or would you buy something else? What features are important to you, and what could you do without? If you do not use a backpack, why not (maybe there is a better solution that I am not aware of)?

Looking for any and all opinions!

I don't use a photo specific backpack. Mine is a Swiss Gear designed to hold a 17" laptop. It's just big enough to zip closed around my oversized Asus gamer laptop. I also carry all of the gear in my sig, plus accessories like filters, batteries, chargers, cables, computer power brick and mouse, my nook for reading on the plane, etc. It's loaded to the max and weighs in at a good 35-40 pounds, but it works well for me, and it fits easily in the overhead even in the smaller commuter prop that I take from Miami to Nassau.


Rick
6D Mark II - EF 17-40 f4 L -- EF 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro -- EF 70-200 f4 L IS w/1.4 II TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
May 12, 2013 22:01 |  #8

tvphotog wrote in post #15925316 (external link)
I stopped carrying a backpack when I realized how heavy it was. Now I use the Pelican 1514 into which I can get the three bodies and six out of the seven lenses in my sig. I wheel it through the airport and onto the plane, and carry my Lowepro Stealth Reporter on my shoulder, filled with two Speedlites, the 50mm lens, a book and a sandwich, plus earbuds, glasses, etc. The Pelican easily fits overhead and the Stealth Reporter under my seat.

I pack a Lowepro ulitity belt and harness in checked luggage for walking around in cities, or the Stealth Reporter. I also pack the Classified 140 for the evenings.

I already have the 1514, but it is just too heavy. It starts off at 6.5 kg empty, while the Airport Accelerator weighs in at 2.5 kg with everything attached, and only 1.9 kg with waist strap and such removed. That means that I can load a whole lot of gear before I catch up with the weight of the Pelican, and since airlines are starting to crack down on carry-on weight, this is likely to make a huge difference in the future.

The good thing about the Pelican is that it can be checked without having to worry about your gear being damaged.


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
May 13, 2013 07:09 |  #9

Rudi wrote in post #15925886 (external link)
I already have the 1514, but it is just too heavy. It starts off at 6.5 kg empty, while the Airport Accelerator weighs in at 2.5 kg with everything attached, and only 1.9 kg with waist strap and such removed. That means that I can load a whole lot of gear before I catch up with the weight of the Pelican, and since airlines are starting to crack down on carry-on weight, this is likely to make a huge difference in the future.

The good thing about the Pelican is that it can be checked without having to worry about your gear being damaged.

Don't check a Pelican with camera gear inside. Here's what happened in Naples when I tried that.

https://photography-on-the.net …0667&highlight=​tamperseal


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
May 13, 2013 17:59 |  #10

tvphotog wrote in post #15926719 (external link)
Don't check a Pelican with camera gear inside. Here's what happened in Naples when I tried that.

https://photography-on-the.net …0667&highlight=​tamperseal

Well, that's the whole idea behind buying a backpack that is light yet holds a lot of gear - I can carry it on the plane with me!

Sorry to hear about your experience at Naples, but good to know that the Pelican and the locks held up to the assault.


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lydaqky
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined May 2013
     
May 14, 2013 03:59 |  #11

I want as soon as I get off the plane, without needing to repack or switch bags.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by ADVERTISEMENT



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trique ­ Daddi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,094 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Feb 2007
Location: East coast of Florida
     
May 14, 2013 06:05 |  #12

http://www.thinktankph​oto.com …-bags/airport-series.aspx (external link)

I use a ThinkTank Airport Take Off that is a couple of years old. I raley use the backpack straps and love the rolling feature.

Happy shopping!


Canon 7DMKII,7D 40D, 20D, CANON 100-400mm IS 4.5/5.6L, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L, Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 100mm 2.8 macro, Kenko Extension Tubes, Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS, 580EX II Flash,Gittos MH 5580 monopod, Thinktank Airport Takeoff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
El ­ Pedro
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 12
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Australia
     
May 18, 2013 06:13 |  #13

I fly 6-8 times a month and life is peachy with the F-Stop Loka. Fits all my gear in along with space for laptop, iPad, noise cancelling headphones, and other small personal items.

It fits easily in the overhead baggage compartments or if the seat next to me is empty I put it in the footwell next to me so I can fire off some shots in air.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
May 18, 2013 09:46 |  #14

Rudi wrote in post #15928737 (external link)
Well, that's the whole idea behind buying a backpack that is light yet holds a lot of gear - I can carry it on the plane with me!

Sorry to hear about your experience at Naples, but good to know that the Pelican and the locks held up to the assault.

I didn't check it because it was heavy but because the tripod was in it and the security refused to allow it on the plane. Now I always put the tripod into checked baggage. The Pelican always goes in the overhead.

IMO, nothing offers protection against jarring, bumping and dropping like a Pelican. I can't afford to land in a place with something out of whack and not have a shop to repair it or replace it with confidence..


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
El ­ Pedro
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 12
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Australia
     
May 18, 2013 15:27 |  #15

The problem is in Australia checked baggage weight limit is 7kgs. The Pelican almost weighs that dry. Chances of having your bag weighed at the gate are a lot lower if its on your back.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,188 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Any frequent flyers here?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1064 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.