Today I came across this award-winning photo that someone claims to be a fraud. There is a lot of evidence and explanations in the link below:
(just sroll to "And the award goes to")
What do you guys think? Is it a composite? Or is it original?
I think it can be a composite, but the result is perfectly achievable with some dodge and burning as well....
EDIT: just for comparison, this is a 2012 photo that won the Nat Geo contest and was disqualified because of a cloned plastic bag: