Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 17 May 2013 (Friday) 00:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Boxer Portrait

 
Pixels2011
Member
Avatar
206 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 3
Joined May 2011
Location: Albert Lea, USA
     
May 17, 2013 00:53 |  #1

Curious what this PP looks like to others. I kind of like it, but wonder if something could be done better.

Original:

IMAGE: http://i558.photobucket.com/albums/ss23/DLOPhotography/Home/_MG_5582_zps173508db.jpg

PP
IMAGE: http://i558.photobucket.com/albums/ss23/DLOPhotography/Home/_MG_5582copy_zps7a9de5d0.jpg

Debi

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stanclark
Goldmember
Avatar
1,143 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Windsor,California
     
May 17, 2013 02:30 |  #2

prefer the original


So if God made Man & Woman....whats his excuse for Nikon...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
May 17, 2013 05:05 |  #3

If you look at the ridge of the dog's back you can see visible evidence that it is a composite image; the green pixels are very obvious and the luminance of the background does not match the subject.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adamfarl
Member
100 posts
Joined Feb 2012
     
May 17, 2013 06:32 |  #4

Im not sure about the pose in general... when I look at it, my eyes immediately go to the left to follow where the dog is looking and fall right out of the image.

I like the contrast of the brown and green as well. I would definitely try to crop or patch that white thing in the far upper left though, so ALL of the background melts together in green.


Canon 6D | Canon 50 1.4 | Sigma 150-500 | Canon 17-40L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pixels2011
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
206 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 3
Joined May 2011
Location: Albert Lea, USA
     
May 17, 2013 16:39 |  #5

stanclark wrote in post #15940120 (external link)
prefer the original

Thank you. I think I like the original too after posting this. I'm not much of a PP person to begin with! Just thought I would try something new.

PixelMagic wrote in post #15940258 (external link)
If you look at the ridge of the dog's back you can see visible evidence that it is a composite image; the green pixels are very obvious and the luminance of the background does not match the subject.

Thank you! Yes, I see that now on his back. I'm sure that can be fixed, but after reading the reviews I think the original might be better.

adamfarl wrote in post #15940358 (external link)
Im not sure about the pose in general... when I look at it, my eyes immediately go to the left to follow where the dog is looking and fall right out of the image.

I like the contrast of the brown and green as well. I would definitely try to crop or patch that white thing in the far upper left though, so ALL of the background melts together in green.

Thank you for your opinions and advice. I didn't even notice the white thing in the corner, which is my garage by the way. That needs to go. I thought the brownish background would be a little more artsy ... but I'm not a pro at PP, so I will keep trying. It is kind of fun messing around in photoshop, but for the long haul I just don't have the time.

Thank you everyone for your reply's!


Debi

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ktan7
Goldmember
1,016 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Vancouver
     
May 18, 2013 12:02 |  #6

I like the original because it looks more natural.


Vancouver wedding photography (external link)
Picture blog (external link)
Mexico wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MMp
Goldmember
Avatar
3,721 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 1079
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Northeast US
     
May 18, 2013 17:09 |  #7

+1 for another boxer owner!

Definitely liking the original better...what made you want to change the background to begin with? I think it would have been better if we could at least see both of his eyes, although not necessarily looking straight at the camera. Other than that, the top left corner would bug me. Although, that could easily be cloned out.


With the impending forum closure, please consider joining the unofficial adjunct to the POTN forum, The POTN Forum Facebook Group (external link), as an alternate way of maintaining communication with our members and sharing/discussing the hobby.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,180 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Boxer Portrait
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1020 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.