Kevan Goldmember 3,125 posts Likes: 17 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Easton, MD More info | May 21, 2013 14:03 | #1 |
saea501 ... spilled over a little on the panties More info | May 21, 2013 16:15 | #2 I like this quite a bit. Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanThoman Goldmember 2,646 posts Likes: 124 Joined Aug 2009 Location: georgia lake country More info | May 21, 2013 20:00 | #3 |
May 21, 2013 22:08 | #4 Thanks folks. As for its brightness, during the edit process, I had created a screen layer to work on her eyes but upon seeing the brighter image I really liked the direction the image was going. Naturally, I had to scale back on the opacity and I did so just short of blowing her highlights. Or maybe I did just a little.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 24, 2013 19:17 | #5 lovely, but way too bright. Skin tones are lost.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rivas8409 Goldmember 2,500 posts Likes: 586 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Lemoore, California More info | Sep 24, 2013 19:20 | #6 I tend to expose on the brighter side as well but I think this is just a TAD, a smidget, too far right. Nice portrait though. I like the editorial feel it has to it. Body: Canon 5DmkII│Canon M50
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DocFrankenstein Cream of the Crop 12,324 posts Likes: 13 Joined Apr 2004 Location: where the buffalo roam More info | Sep 25, 2013 20:17 | #7 Why not short light her? National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1219 guests, 173 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||