Pros and cons of both? Which do you feel works better for you?
daystar Senior Member 589 posts Likes: 520 Joined Aug 2008 Location: East Coast, US More info | May 23, 2013 10:17 | #1 Pros and cons of both? Which do you feel works better for you? Nikon D750 | Nikon D7100 | 85mm 1.8G | 50mm 1.8G | 35mm 1.8G | Tamron 70-200 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mmcguire Senior Member 273 posts Likes: 17 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | May 23, 2013 10:30 | #2 Both. Website to display your work and a blog to attract search engine traffic.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BlurMyReality Mostly Lurking 11 posts Joined May 2013 More info | May 23, 2013 12:18 | #3 I find myself rarely browsing photographers' websites and usually going straight to their blogs. The question is - do you want to attract clients or viewers? If the first - then both website and blog might be useful. If vierwers - I'd go for the blog only. My travel photography blog: http://blurmyreality.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 23, 2013 12:25 | #4 This question came up recently on CreativeLive interview and I agreed with their conclusion. Website should stand to represent Photographer instead of Blog as sample/images are careful selected to create the first impression (3-5 seconds). Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gewb Goldmember More info | May 23, 2013 12:37 | #5 I never read blogs (well, maybe one or two a year). Never read a photographer's blog. 90D / 60D / Pro1 / A85
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drvnbysound Goldmember 3,316 posts Likes: 12 Joined Aug 2009 More info | May 23, 2013 14:46 | #6 Both. It can be done with a single site - you don't need a separate site from a blog. I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ktan7 Goldmember 1,016 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2013 Location: Vancouver More info | May 23, 2013 16:53 | #7 You need both website and blog! Website is static. You change it probably once a year. It's your store! Vancouver wedding photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
John Goldmember 1,405 posts Likes: 35 Joined Oct 2006 More info | May 23, 2013 17:50 | #8 A blog can enhance a web site; it can be a great marketing tool if done right. john | gear | web hosting deal for POTN members!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kevinthaiphotos Member 99 posts Joined May 2012 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | May 29, 2013 20:54 | #9 You don't need separate the two, both can be on the same website and usually works in each other's favours. In my case - although my current website isn't a great example because I recently did a complete overhaul, but on my old site I used to have the blog section and which goes over my preparation and outtakes and photos of my studio setup when shooting with a client it was sort of like documented through my blog. Kevin Thai Photos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CoPhotoGuy Senior Member 276 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2013 More info | May 29, 2013 21:01 | #10 I'm confused, a blog is a website.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 29, 2013 23:48 | #11 Link to blog on website and link to website on blog. Mitch
LOG IN TO REPLY |
child_photographer Member 35 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Houston More info | People do have blog/websites its like two in one. Natural Light all day everyday!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cuechick Member 42 posts Joined Jun 2013 Location: L.A. More info | Jun 05, 2013 17:55 | #13 You MUST have a website and I do think both is a good ideal, if you're a working professionally. Your blog can drive traffic to your website but you should be updating your site much more than once a year (as someone else suggested). You should update every time you produce new work, so more like once a month. A blog should be updated a minimum of once a week to stay relevant.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BlackParrot Member 186 posts Likes: 55 Joined May 2013 Location: Phila Burbs More info | Jun 09, 2013 09:27 | #14 I'm curious if using your FB page as a "blog" would be more advantageous ... depending on the number of friends and "Friends" you have? I've tried blogging in the past, and I always let it lag at some point. On the flip side I am always on FB and connecting with new people. I also have several Friends on there with well more than 1000 Friends, thus leading to an instant much larger audience. 1D Mk3 | Tamron SP 35/1.8 VC | Tamron SP 85/1.8 VC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cuechick Member 42 posts Joined Jun 2013 Location: L.A. More info | Jun 09, 2013 17:11 | #15 I think FB is a good tool for driving people to your blog but I don't think it's a replacement. It is not very attractive for one thing and you will limit who will access your blog, not everyone has FB (believe it or not) and I think it is also not a very professional platform for branding your business. JMO.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 513 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||