Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos Presentation & Building Galleries 
Thread started 23 May 2013 (Thursday) 10:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Blog vs website to represent you?

 
daystar
Senior Member
Avatar
589 posts
Likes: 520
Joined Aug 2008
Location: East Coast, US
     
May 23, 2013 10:17 |  #1

Pros and cons of both? Which do you feel works better for you?


Nikon D750 | Nikon D7100 | 85mm 1.8G | 50mm 1.8G | 35mm 1.8G | Tamron 70-200 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mmcguire
Senior Member
273 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
May 23, 2013 10:30 |  #2

Both. Website to display your work and a blog to attract search engine traffic.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlurMyReality
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
11 posts
Joined May 2013
     
May 23, 2013 12:18 |  #3

I find myself rarely browsing photographers' websites and usually going straight to their blogs. The question is - do you want to attract clients or viewers? If the first - then both website and blog might be useful. If vierwers - I'd go for the blog only.


My travel photography blog: http://blurmyreality.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tigerkn
Goldmember
4,119 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 162
Joined Feb 2009
Location: CA
     
May 23, 2013 12:25 |  #4

This question came up recently on CreativeLive interview and I agreed with their conclusion. Website should stand to represent Photographer instead of Blog as sample/images are careful selected to create the first impression (3-5 seconds).


Website (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Instagram (external link) | Gears (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gewb
Goldmember
Avatar
1,006 posts
Gallery: 321 photos
Likes: 2208
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Denver, Colorado USA
     
May 23, 2013 12:37 |  #5

I never read blogs (well, maybe one or two a year). Never read a photographer's blog.

I always browse photo sites.

Regards,
GEWB


90D / 60D / Pro1 / A85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drvnbysound
Goldmember
3,316 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Aug 2009
     
May 23, 2013 14:46 |  #6

Both. It can be done with a single site - you don't need a separate site from a blog.


I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
..::Gear Listing::.. --==Feedback==--
...A few umbrella brackets I own...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ktan7
Goldmember
1,016 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Vancouver
     
May 23, 2013 16:53 |  #7

You need both website and blog! Website is static. You change it probably once a year. It's your store!

Blog is dynamic. Constantly changes and updates as your create new images for your site.


Vancouver wedding photography (external link)
Picture blog (external link)
Mexico wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John
Goldmember
Avatar
1,405 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Oct 2006
     
May 23, 2013 17:50 |  #8

A blog can enhance a web site; it can be a great marketing tool if done right.


john | gear | web hosting deal for POTN members!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevinthaiphotos
Member
Avatar
99 posts
Joined May 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
May 29, 2013 20:54 |  #9

You don't need separate the two, both can be on the same website and usually works in each other's favours. In my case - although my current website isn't a great example because I recently did a complete overhaul, but on my old site I used to have the blog section and which goes over my preparation and outtakes and photos of my studio setup when shooting with a client it was sort of like documented through my blog.

I recently shifted focus (no pun intended) on my style and area of photography so my website is still a little fresh so not many blog posts, but I intend to do the same again, to attract more readers etc.


Kevin Thai Photos (external link) | Facebook (external link) | flickr (external link)
Canon 50D Gripped | Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 | Canon 70-200mm f/4L | Canon 580ex II | YN-560II | Cactus v5's
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CoPhotoGuy
Senior Member
276 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2013
     
May 29, 2013 21:01 |  #10

I'm confused, a blog is a website.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MrMitch
Member
Avatar
193 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 39
Joined Apr 2013
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
May 29, 2013 23:48 |  #11

Link to blog on website and link to website on blog.

Post blog posts with one or two images, then make them go to your site to see all of them.

This might be an option for you.


Mitch
Trying to make a commercial passenger jet mega-thread: https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=15968272#po​st15968272

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
child_photographer
Member
Avatar
35 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Houston
     
Jun 01, 2013 12:38 as a reply to  @ MrMitch's post |  #12

People do have blog/websites its like two in one.


Natural Light all day everyday!!
Tonya Dailey Photography
http://tonyadaileylife​style.com (external link)
http://lifestylelesson​sblog.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cuechick
Member
Avatar
42 posts
Joined Jun 2013
Location: L.A.
     
Jun 05, 2013 17:55 |  #13

You MUST have a website and I do think both is a good ideal, if you're a working professionally. Your blog can drive traffic to your website but you should be updating your site much more than once a year (as someone else suggested). You should update every time you produce new work, so more like once a month. A blog should be updated a minimum of once a week to stay relevant.

But here's the thing, most photogs just post more about jobs they have been doing and so most of the people who look at are friends, family and other photogs looking for leads... :eek:

I took a different approach to my blog (external link), rather than just posting more of my commercial work, I shoot specifically for it... I made it more like a little magazine about stuff I find interesting. It has gained its own following and I have not only gotten a lot of work because of it. I have grown a lot creatively and have gone from shooting mostly fashion, kids & portraits to also shooting food, lifestyle & interiors.

It was a bigger undertaking than I had imagined in the beginning and after being approached by a few companies, I did have advertisers for awhile... However it did not bring in much and I felt an obligation to post at least 4 times a week. So after a recent move west I changed that and now post just once or twice a week. I only promote clients (at no charge) and products through amazon which I get a tiny kickback for as an Amazon associate (which you must disclose on your blog) it does not even cover my operating cost but it is something...

I started with Wordpress but moved it to Squarespace (external link) which allows for a lot more customization. I designed everything on my blog in photoshop! ;) I also have it linked from my website (external link) and designed them to be cohesive but separate.

http://www.piewacketbl​og.com (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlackParrot
Member
Avatar
186 posts
Likes: 55
Joined May 2013
Location: Phila Burbs
     
Jun 09, 2013 09:27 |  #14

I'm curious if using your FB page as a "blog" would be more advantageous ... depending on the number of friends and "Friends" you have? I've tried blogging in the past, and I always let it lag at some point. On the flip side I am always on FB and connecting with new people. I also have several Friends on there with well more than 1000 Friends, thus leading to an instant much larger audience.
I do not have a broad knowledge of the connection aspect of blogs, so if I'm way off base please let me know.


1D Mk3 | Tamron SP 35/1.8 VC | Tamron SP 85/1.8 VC
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cuechick
Member
Avatar
42 posts
Joined Jun 2013
Location: L.A.
     
Jun 09, 2013 17:11 |  #15

I think FB is a good tool for driving people to your blog but I don't think it's a replacement. It is not very attractive for one thing and you will limit who will access your blog, not everyone has FB (believe it or not) and I think it is also not a very professional platform for branding your business. JMO.

I also don't trust FB with my copyright and never upload images to it other than social ones.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,330 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
Blog vs website to represent you?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos Presentation & Building Galleries 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
513 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.