I'll be picking up a 17-40 this Summer and wonder if any of you have used the EW-83J (crop hood) with an APS-H 1.3 sensor camera.How much vignetting occurs? Just curious...
halitime Goldmember  1,271 posts Likes: 19 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Lantzville B.C. Can. More info | May 23, 2013 23:25 | #1 I'll be picking up a 17-40 this Summer and wonder if any of you have used the EW-83J (crop hood) with an APS-H 1.3 sensor camera.How much vignetting occurs? Just curious... Gear List : 1D MK II n,Gripped XSi,70-200 f4,300 f4 IS,Canon 24-105 f4,35 f2 IS,EF 50 1.8 MK I,EF-S 10-22,Canon 1.4 II Extender,Canon 25mm Ext Tube,YN 468/460 II,RF 602's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
msowsun "approx 8mm"  More info | May 24, 2013 16:22 | #2 Yes, you can use the EW-83J on a 1.3 crop camera like the 1D.  This link shows which lens each hood it meant to be used on: http://www.lensplay.com/lenses/lens_hoods1.html       And just to add to the confusion, there is now a EW-83L for the new 24-70 4.0 IS which may be useful on some other lenses as well.  Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joeseph "smells like turd"  More info | May 25, 2013 00:20 | #3 I got an EW-83J for use on my 16-35mm Mk I, and it's just a tad too much hood with 1D2&3 - plan to remove a bit of material from it next time I'm in the workshop mood. some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word"  More info | May 25, 2013 16:58 | #4 halitime wrote in post #15961983 I'll be picking up a 17-40 this Summer and wonder if any of you have used the EW-83J (crop hood) with an APS-H 1.3 sensor camera.How much vignetting occurs? Just curious... the hoods of either the 17-55 or 24-105 work best. the 24L hood fits very tight but can be made to work smoothly with some light sanding. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
halitime THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,271 posts Likes: 19 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Lantzville B.C. Can. More info | May 27, 2013 12:02 | #5 Thanks Ed,this makes it easy since I'm going to pick up a 24-105 in the next week or so. Gear List : 1D MK II n,Gripped XSi,70-200 f4,300 f4 IS,Canon 24-105 f4,35 f2 IS,EF 50 1.8 MK I,EF-S 10-22,Canon 1.4 II Extender,Canon 25mm Ext Tube,YN 468/460 II,RF 602's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | you're welcome http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
halitime THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,271 posts Likes: 19 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Lantzville B.C. Can. More info | May 27, 2013 12:13 | #7 I like the idea of two lenses and one hood until I get a full frame body. Gear List : 1D MK II n,Gripped XSi,70-200 f4,300 f4 IS,Canon 24-105 f4,35 f2 IS,EF 50 1.8 MK I,EF-S 10-22,Canon 1.4 II Extender,Canon 25mm Ext Tube,YN 468/460 II,RF 602's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | May 27, 2013 12:30 | #8 halitime wrote in post #15972264 I like the idea of two lenses and one hood until I get a full frame body. yeah hoods can be a pain to pack. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
halitime THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,271 posts Likes: 19 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Lantzville B.C. Can. More info | May 27, 2013 12:37 | #9 Especially the 17-40 hood.I had the same hood when I had my 10-22 and ended up just leaving it at home most of the time. Gear List : 1D MK II n,Gripped XSi,70-200 f4,300 f4 IS,Canon 24-105 f4,35 f2 IS,EF 50 1.8 MK I,EF-S 10-22,Canon 1.4 II Extender,Canon 25mm Ext Tube,YN 468/460 II,RF 602's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | May 27, 2013 14:14 | #10 halitime wrote in post #15972332 Especially the 17-40 hood.I had the same hood when I had my 10-22 and ended up just leaving it at home most of the time. I very seldom use my 16-35L II hood because it is useless against flare. if I know I am going to be walking around with that lens then i'll use the hood for bump protection because that's all that it is good for. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1133 guests, 173 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
. as I recall then 17-55 hood is slightly deeper than the hood for the 24-105L but both will work.