winters19 Senior Member  262 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2010 Location: Pierceton, Indiana More info | May 24, 2013 12:32 | #1 My first real try with OCF all shot with 35L.   haleigh6 by winters1980, on Flickr2  haleigh10 by winters1980, on Flickr3  haleigh8 by winters1980, on Flickr4  haleigh7 by winters1980, on Flickr5  haleigh5 by winters1980, on Flickr6  haleigh4 by winters1980, on Flickr7  haleigh by winters1980, on FlickrCanon 7D -Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC- -Canon 28mm F2.8- -Canon 50mm F1.8-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
six3onei Junior Member 28 posts Joined May 2013 More info | May 24, 2013 13:54 | #2 came out great to me. did you use a softbox or umbrella with the OCF? Canon T3i w/ Magic Lantern | EFS 18-55mm IS | EFS 55-250mm IS | EF 50mm 1.8 | EF 40mm 2.8 | Yongnuo YN560 & YN560 II | Canon RC-6
LOG IN TO REPLY |
winters19 THREAD STARTER Senior Member 262 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2010 Location: Pierceton, Indiana More info | May 24, 2013 14:39 | #3 six3onei wrote in post #15963715 came out great to me. did you use a softbox or umbrella with the OCF? shot through an umbrella, thanks! Canon 7D -Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC- -Canon 28mm F2.8- -Canon 50mm F1.8-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | May 24, 2013 14:47 | #4 Your white balance and colors are all over the charts which in each individual shot might be fine, but shown as a set its a bit startling. The lighting is good, but the half body shots would be more flattering with a longer lens. She is a lovely girl and you captured her well.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Throwcherrybombs Member  95 posts Joined May 2013 More info | May 24, 2013 20:23 | #5 That watermark is totally distracting. I think the first is the best of the set, except next time try and find level ground for the chair.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
windpig Chopped liver  More info | May 24, 2013 21:13 | #6 Lookin' good Would you like to buy a vowel?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 24, 2013 22:27 | #7 I mostly agree with what everyone else has said. I like each image individually, but as a set, the processing is so different that they don't go together real well (I have a really bad habit of this too!).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
abbypanda Goldmember 1,804 posts Likes: 6 Joined Nov 2011 More info | May 25, 2013 01:34 | #8 I like them, first 3 being my favorites.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ktan7 Goldmember 1,016 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2013 Location: Vancouver More info | May 25, 2013 09:43 | #9 I really like the lighting on #1. Vancouver wedding photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin  44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | May 25, 2013 09:49 | #10 davidmtml wrote in post #15964990 I mostly agree with what everyone else has said. I like each image individually, but as a set, the processing is so different that they don't go together real well (I have a really bad habit of this too!). I agree that the watermark is a little distracting, but really not that big of an issue. Maybe just lower the opacity of it a little bit. Agree with Davis. She is a cutie, I am sure you will get more sessions! you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 25, 2013 16:42 | #11 I find grabbing a few images and watching them through as a slideshow helps to point out differences in processing. It is very easy to wind up with differences in skin tone Bill R
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 797 guests, 145 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
