Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 24 May 2013 (Friday) 22:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which version do you prefer??

 
davidmtml
Senior Member
Avatar
848 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 390
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Montana
     
May 24, 2013 22:24 |  #1

Which version of this do you prefer?

Here is the original

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7391/8810297791_abc0e8ea2e_b.jpg

My first edit.
IMAGE: http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2853/8820884924_c49cf90f76_b.jpg

A more subdued tone
IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3804/8810297113_cca93d0e55_b.jpg

B&W
IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3743/8810296763_dd6a511370_b.jpg

Thanks!



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
patrick ­ j
Goldmember
2,468 posts
Gallery: 77 photos
Likes: 8744
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Denver
     
May 24, 2013 22:57 |  #2

I like the first one best, hmm, looking longer ... maybe number 2. Close call. The third looks a bit ghostly.


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeremyBlake
Senior Member
Avatar
532 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Columbus, OH, USA
     
May 24, 2013 23:36 |  #3

I'd go #2, but I'd pull back on the eyes a little.


flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | Gear | Facebook (external link) | Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
May 24, 2013 23:46 as a reply to  @ JeremyBlake's post |  #4

I like the B&W best.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,971 posts
Gallery: 236 photos
Likes: 17609
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
     
May 25, 2013 08:21 as a reply to  @ rrblint's post |  #5

What a cutie.

I prefer the b&w also because on my monitor, her skin tones on the color edits appear to be too orange. Of the color versions, I prefer the subdued one.

I know skin tones are a matter of preference, but here's an edit I tried with a more 'baby pinkish' look. I also added soft focus and a bit of white vignette. I did no enhancements to her eyes.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/05/4/LQ_650280.jpg
Image hosted by forum (650280) © navydoc [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beginner17
Member
Avatar
74 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 262
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Oranienburg, Germany
     
May 25, 2013 08:50 |  #6

I prefer your 1st edit, like the tones and the light


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ktan7
Goldmember
1,016 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Vancouver
     
May 25, 2013 09:37 |  #7

Truthfully, I don't like any of the color edits. The skin tone is out of range and not real. I prefer the black and white out of all the images. Good composition.


Vancouver wedding photography (external link)
Picture blog (external link)
Mexico wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
May 25, 2013 09:41 as a reply to  @ ktan7's post |  #8

^ I think I agree. Although Gene's edit is closer. maybe a shade less pink.


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidmtml
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
848 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 390
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Montana
     
May 25, 2013 11:05 |  #9

navydoc wrote in post #15965713 (external link)
What a cutie.

I prefer the b&w also because on my monitor, her skin tones on the color edits appear to be too orange. Of the color versions, I prefer the subdued one.

I know skin tones are a matter of preference, but here's an edit I tried with a more 'baby pinkish' look. I also added soft focus and a bit of white vignette. I did no enhancements to her eyes.

See now on my monitor, this looks very blue...is that what you were going for? Is it just me??

My first edit, on my computer at least, looks like pretty natural skin tones.

I have been doing my editing lately while at work on my cheap laptop, so it is probably not calibrated all that well..




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
May 25, 2013 11:18 as a reply to  @ davidmtml's post |  #10

I don't see blue in Genes....
I played...

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


I found the light in the mouth area underexposed, so it was easier to de saturate and neutralize the whites.

you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Northwoods ­ Bill
Goldmember
1,145 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 413
Joined Jun 2012
     
May 25, 2013 16:38 |  #11

On my monitor (calibrated) Gene's edit looks best


Bill R
Web:https://www.flickr.com​/photos/whitebirch/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
May 25, 2013 16:43 as a reply to  @ Northwoods Bill's post |  #12

I love Gene's color, not so much the smoothing;softening.


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,971 posts
Gallery: 236 photos
Likes: 17609
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
     
May 25, 2013 17:16 as a reply to  @ Flo's post |  #13

I was going for a 'dreamy' effect to concentrate on her beautiful eyes...hence the extra smoothing. As I mentioned earlier, skin tones are very much a matter of personal taste as well as what kind of mood is sought. I just thought I'd give the OP an alternate look for comparison.


Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidmtml
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
848 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 390
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Montana
     
May 25, 2013 17:29 |  #14

navydoc wrote in post #15966946 (external link)
I was going for a 'dreamy' effect to concentrate on her beautiful eyes...hence the extra smoothing. As I mentioned earlier, skin tones are very much a matter of personal taste as well as what kind of mood is sought. I just thought I'd give the OP an alternate look for comparison.

I absolutely appreciate your edit! I really like it, but ON MY SCREEN, certainly looks less "natural".

I don't have any mechanical calibration device, but I have run the simple online ones, but while those are decent for brightness/contrast, they are not very good for color accuracy. I am having a couple prints made, and am going to try to calibrate to get close to those, as that is the most important anyway.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HappySnapper90
Cream of the Crop
5,145 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
May 26, 2013 18:49 |  #15

No. 3




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,292 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Which version do you prefer??
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1497 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.