Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 19 Jan 2006 (Thursday) 10:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Projectors

 
gpocock
Member
207 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Jan 19, 2006 10:03 |  #1

Hello

I've been burning my pictures to DVD with Proshow Gold and get good slide shows on my 32" LCD TV.

But I want to go bigger and have slide shows like one used to with 35mm slides.

Has anyone had any experience with projectors such as the Canon LV S4? What is the quality like in a large (by UK standards) sitting room using a 5 foot by 5 foot screen?

Any other comments most welcome.

Best Wishes

Geoffrey Pocock




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Jan 19, 2006 18:52 |  #2

Are you referring to a projector that connects to the video output of a computer and displays images from image files on that computer? If so, it has always been a high price issue for me. I haven't seen any good ones for much less than $2000 US.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gpocock
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
207 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Jan 20, 2006 05:48 as a reply to  @ Robert_Lay's post |  #3

Robert_Lay wrote:
Are you referring to a projector that connects to the video output of a computer and displays images from image files on that computer? If so, it has always been a high price issue for me. I haven't seen any good ones for much less than $2000 US.

Yes, except that I would probably use a dvd player rather than a laptop. They are expensive but no one said photography was cheap. I guess most of us have spent well over £1000.00 on kit.

Photographs are no good unless we look at them and with the resolution and quality one can get from a dslr it is nice to see large pictures - A3 or better if printed.

That's why I would like to project them like 35mm slides but I don't want to pay the money if the technology still has a way to go. I guess, I can try to borrow a projector. But I would still welcome any opinions on quality.

Thanks for taking the time to comment.

Best Wishes

Geoffrey Pocock




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Jan 20, 2006 11:08 |  #4

Just don't lose sight of the fact that most prints (and electronic displays) have more resolution than needed based on the criteria of the human eye's resolution power (which is about 1/4th of a milliradian.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dbump
Senior Member
Avatar
755 posts
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Denver, CO
     
Jan 20, 2006 12:59 |  #5

Also keep in mind that your resolution will be more limited on a DVD than it will straight from a computer. Typically DVDs are 720x480, unless your player supports one of the HD formats, AND you've burned the images at that resolution. By comparison, most new projectors will display 1600x1200 straight from the computer. Not a huge difference on a small screen, but it may become noticeable (depending on how sharp the projector is) on the scale you're looking at.
Slide film has the advantage of being analog--no jaggies to show up when your resolution drops to a low ppi.
A possible workaround/cheat would be to use something like Microsoft's PhotoStory to transform static images into moving ones (ala Ken Burns)--the motion will help to hide those issues from our eyes.


7D, G10, 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 70-200 f/2.8 IS, 100 Macro, 50 f/1.4, 430EX II
There are no wrong notes
--Thelonious Monk

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Jan 20, 2006 15:41 as a reply to  @ dbump's post |  #6

dbump wrote:
Also keep in mind that your resolution will be more limited on a DVD than it will straight from a computer. Typically DVDs are 720x480, unless your player supports one of the HD formats, AND you've burned the images at that resolution. By comparison, most new projectors will display 1600x1200 straight from the computer. Not a huge difference on a small screen, but it may become noticeable (depending on how sharp the projector is) on the scale you're looking at.
Slide film has the advantage of being analog--no jaggies to show up when your resolution drops to a low ppi.
A possible workaround/cheat would be to use something like Microsoft's PhotoStory to transform static images into moving ones (ala Ken Burns)--the motion will help to hide those issues from our eyes.

Very good point about the DVD resolution. I was not aware of that. I was thinking in terms of images stored on DVD's as JPG's, which would not be limited to 720x480.

Just out of curiousity, what format are we talking about on the DVD's - some kind of video slide show where the slides are presented in continuous fashion, or are you really talking about the format as displayed on the TV set or whatever monitor is used with the DVD player?
I'm really not understanding where the 720 x480 limitation comes into it.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dbump
Senior Member
Avatar
755 posts
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Denver, CO
     
Jan 20, 2006 16:17 |  #7

Even if the images were saved on a data DVD (ISO or UDF format), and the DVD player is capable of browsing data discs and displaying the images (definitely possible), the DVD player's video output is limited to a particular resolution. The lowest common denominator is 720x480 (or 720 x 576 for PAL).
See http://www.dvddemystif​ied.com/dvdfaq.html#3.​4 (external link) for all the mind-numbing details :)
If the DVD player is capable of progressive scan, it can display a higher resolution.

I'm using the slang version of resolution here, because it's awkward and probably confusing to do otherwise. Obviously resolution is more than just X pixels by Y pixels--there must be a "per unit distance" in there. Otherwise it's just a pixel count. 720x480 on a 60 inch display will have a resolution of 12ppi; on the 35" display you're currently using, it's 20ppi. Typically you need a far lower resolution on displays than in print (where you'd like more than 150ppi).


7D, G10, 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 70-200 f/2.8 IS, 100 Macro, 50 f/1.4, 430EX II
There are no wrong notes
--Thelonious Monk

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gpocock
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
207 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Jan 20, 2006 16:30 |  #8

A lot to think about here.

Thanks for the input

Best wishes

Geoffrey Pocock




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
puttick
Senior Member
Avatar
816 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Mar 2002
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
     
Jan 20, 2006 17:23 |  #9

Have you considered a High Definition large screen LCD or plasma TV? They do something like 1368 x 768 pixels, you can get quite large ones, and it would have more than one use. You would need something to drive it (HD DVD?) at that resolution.


Nigel Puttick
North Yorkshire, UK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOS_JD
Goldmember
2,925 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Lanarkshire, Scotland
     
Jan 20, 2006 17:37 |  #10

I've created DVDs using Proshow although I use producer. Quality on DVD is nowhere near that of the exe files it produces for playing on the PC. In the DVD settings on producer you can increase the quality/resolution of the video output. Not sure if this can be done in Gold. Bump this up as much as you can to increase the quality. Make sure it's set to best/highest quality for output and it should be ok.

Cheers
Jim


All My Gear
5D MkIII & 5D MKII + Grips | 24-70 f2.8L IS | 24-105 f4L IS | 70-200 f2.8L IS MkII | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f1.8 | 100 f2.8 | 1.4x MkII | Tamron 17-35 f2.8-4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidW
Goldmember
3,165 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
     
Jan 22, 2006 13:05 |  #11

I keep meaning to stick some 1280 x 1024 maximum quality JPEGs on an SD card, and put it in the card reader of our Dell 4100MP projector - another family member is a freelance consultant and trainer, which is why we own this projector.

I wonder how I'll land up feeling about the results. I have no way of calibrating the projector - an ICC profile would be nice, but I haven't got the right sort of profiling kit for that job. It might be an interesting experiment, if nothing more.

David




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Jan 22, 2006 16:49 as a reply to  @ DavidW's post |  #12

DavidW wrote:
I keep meaning to stick some 1280 x 1024 maximum quality JPEGs on an SD card, and put it in the card reader of our Dell 4100MP projector - another family member is a freelance consultant and trainer, which is why we own this projector.

I wonder how I'll land up feeling about the results. I have no way of calibrating the projector - an ICC profile would be nice, but I haven't got the right sort of profiling kit for that job. It might be an interesting experiment, if nothing more.

David

Are you suggesting that it won't read and display a JPG of the full virtual image size (5 - 8 MP)?
In other words, why would you have to downsample the images?


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidW
Goldmember
3,165 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
     
Jan 22, 2006 16:54 |  #13

From memory, the card reader in the projector will downsample the images, but I may as well create them myself at the target resolution, sharpened as I want them.

In any case, I shoot RAW plus small JPEG, but discard the JPEGs fairly early in my workflow (I only use them for previewing). The projector doesn't understand RAW files.

David




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mbze430
Goldmember
Avatar
2,454 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Chino Hills
     
Jan 22, 2006 22:48 |  #14

There is also one limiting factor...the projector itself is limited to it's own display resolution. Unless you own a 1080P unit (DLP 1080P is starting from 17k+) there isn't reason to have those files larger in resolution. Most DVD players will downsize them, if your doesn't...well there is a reason why to downsize them before burning.


Gear List

My Hub to my personal work (external link) (just click on the banners)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gpocock
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
207 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Jan 23, 2006 01:34 |  #15

Hello

this is getting more complcated that I thought - that's life.

But we have lots of theory and no practice. Does anyone regularly burn images to disc and use an lcd or ldp projector for slide shows and think that the pictures they see on screen are good, poor or awful?

I want to bore/impress my family like I used to with my 35mm slides.

Best wishes

Geoffrey Pocock




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,677 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Projectors
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1862 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.