Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 28 May 2013 (Tuesday) 21:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Can I post a Raw and ask how you would PP?

 
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,971 posts
Gallery: 236 photos
Likes: 17609
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
     
May 30, 2013 12:33 |  #31

travisvwright wrote in post #15982793 (external link)
You did a good job getting the Morning Light feel because when I look at the picture (being the only one familiar with it) I get a weird feeling that it's dawning from the wrong direction. Interesting how different morning light is from sunset.

In that case, maybe a late afternoon light would look more natural to you. :D (I would probably also use a different sky for late afternoon).

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/05/5/LQ_650946.jpg
Image hosted by forum (650946) © navydoc [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
travisvwright
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,057 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 214
Joined Feb 2013
Location: NC
     
May 30, 2013 12:50 |  #32

Much better.


I come here for your expert opinion. Please do not hesitate to critique or edit.
70D, 6D, Canon 135, Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC, Canon 50 1.4, Canon 100 2.8 Macro, Canon 85 1.8, Canon 10-18 4.5 STM

Franklin NC Photographer Travis Wright (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M_Six
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,845 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Dec 2010
Location: East Central IL
     
May 30, 2013 13:27 |  #33

First light

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'

Mark J.
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
travisvwright
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,057 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 214
Joined Feb 2013
Location: NC
     
May 30, 2013 15:20 |  #34

But I guess the long and short of it is I should trash the picture and go shoot it again without blowing out the sky huh?

Notice the other picture "033.CR2" didn't need all this special saving.


I come here for your expert opinion. Please do not hesitate to critique or edit.
70D, 6D, Canon 135, Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC, Canon 50 1.4, Canon 100 2.8 Macro, Canon 85 1.8, Canon 10-18 4.5 STM

Franklin NC Photographer Travis Wright (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CraigPatterson
Senior Member
287 posts
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Colorado
     
May 30, 2013 15:28 |  #35

If you can get to the same location, then yes, reshoot. It's always going to be best to have it right in the first place. But it's very valuable to know how to save a shot, because many of them will never come around again.

It's also not always possible to expose for the entire range of light you can see. So when you go back and expose for the sky, if you're in the same light, you'll find that everything else is underexposed, so you'll still need to save the shot later.


I have a ton of gear, but my gear is just a hammer.
www.craigpatterson.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
travisvwright
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,057 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 214
Joined Feb 2013
Location: NC
     
May 30, 2013 15:37 |  #36

CraigPatterson wrote in post #15983514 (external link)
If you can get to the same location, then yes, reshoot. It's always going to be best to have it right in the first place. But it's very valuable to know how to save a shot, because many of them will never come around again.

It's also not always possible to expose for the entire range of light you can see. So when you go back and expose for the sky, if you're in the same light, you'll find that everything else is underexposed, so you'll still need to save the shot later.

Very good point. I guess I should also wait till the sun is a bit lower also. Maybe a chance to try a subtle HDR.

(This is my back yard I was standing in my driveway 10 feet from my door.)


I come here for your expert opinion. Please do not hesitate to critique or edit.
70D, 6D, Canon 135, Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC, Canon 50 1.4, Canon 100 2.8 Macro, Canon 85 1.8, Canon 10-18 4.5 STM

Franklin NC Photographer Travis Wright (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M_Six
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,845 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Dec 2010
Location: East Central IL
     
May 30, 2013 15:42 as a reply to  @ travisvwright's post |  #37

Or get a neutral grad filter. You could also take two images and expose one for the sky and one for the foreground, then just merge them.

Nice view if that's your back yard.


Mark J.
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
travisvwright
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,057 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 214
Joined Feb 2013
Location: NC
     
May 30, 2013 19:44 |  #38

M_Six wrote in post #15983555 (external link)
You could also take two images and expose one for the sky and one for the foreground, then just merge them.

Pardon my ignorance but isn't that what HDR is?


I come here for your expert opinion. Please do not hesitate to critique or edit.
70D, 6D, Canon 135, Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC, Canon 50 1.4, Canon 100 2.8 Macro, Canon 85 1.8, Canon 10-18 4.5 STM

Franklin NC Photographer Travis Wright (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
travisvwright
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,057 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 214
Joined Feb 2013
Location: NC
     
May 30, 2013 19:46 |  #39

M_Six wrote in post #15983069 (external link)
First light

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'

Do you know what steps you took for this?


I come here for your expert opinion. Please do not hesitate to critique or edit.
70D, 6D, Canon 135, Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC, Canon 50 1.4, Canon 100 2.8 Macro, Canon 85 1.8, Canon 10-18 4.5 STM

Franklin NC Photographer Travis Wright (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M_Six
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,845 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Dec 2010
Location: East Central IL
     
May 30, 2013 19:57 |  #40

travisvwright wrote in post #15984217 (external link)
Pardon my ignorance but isn't that what HDR is?

Sort of, except HDR is usually 3 or more shots that are blended together using HDR software. If you have two shots, you can just layer them and use a blend mode to replace the sky. Or a layer mask. That way your sky is the real one you saw and the leaves around the edges of the trees will blend much easier.

travisvwright wrote in post #15984222 (external link)
Do you know what steps you took for this?

I lowered the saturation on your image and used a cooling filter to get it bluish. Then I brought in the sunrise pic and put it on the bottom layer. Then I changed the blend mode of the top layer to Multiply and just tweaked the levels setting a bit.


Mark J.
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vengence
Goldmember
2,103 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Mar 2013
     
May 31, 2013 09:17 |  #41

M_Six wrote in post #15983555 (external link)
Or get a neutral grad filter. You could also take two images and expose one for the sky and one for the foreground, then just merge them.

Nice view if that's your back yard.

There isn't a nice horizon in that picture to place the GND IMHO. I'd lean much more towards taking 2 or 3 pictures at different exposures and combining them.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sirquack
Goldmember
Avatar
2,599 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 937
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
     
May 31, 2013 09:33 |  #42

Not gonnna lie. Seeing all the different effects you all have taken with the one photo is simply amazing. Most of them have subtle differences that change the mood, time of day, or just overall impact. It is simply spectacular that one photo can take on so many different "lives".


Name is Ron.
Bodies - 6D/5D3/7D2-Gripped
Lenses - Canon 17-40 F4/24-70 F2.8 II/85 F1.8/Canon 70-200 F2.8 II/F4/Sigma 30 DC/Tamron 150-600
Website (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
travisvwright
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,057 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 214
Joined Feb 2013
Location: NC
     
May 31, 2013 09:45 |  #43

vengence wrote in post #15985637 (external link)
There isn't a nice horizon in that picture to place the GND IMHO. I'd lean much more towards taking 2 or 3 pictures at different exposures and combining them.

How about a circular polarizer wouldn't that help?

Normally under the barn is a very modern looking tractor, so even though I stand in this spot 5-10 times a day the shot isn't as nice most of the time.


I come here for your expert opinion. Please do not hesitate to critique or edit.
70D, 6D, Canon 135, Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 70-200 2.8 VC, Canon 50 1.4, Canon 100 2.8 Macro, Canon 85 1.8, Canon 10-18 4.5 STM

Franklin NC Photographer Travis Wright (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CraigPatterson
Senior Member
287 posts
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Colorado
     
May 31, 2013 09:53 |  #44

travisvwright wrote in post #15985715 (external link)
How about a circular polarizer wouldn't that help

Yes, definitely. It will be most effective at a 90 degree angle from the sun, so experiment with the time of day, since you've determined your shot angle already. Some people object to the deeper color they give the sky, thinking they look artificial. But I like the effect, and it's a much more natural adjustment than trying to mask out leaves later.


I have a ton of gear, but my gear is just a hammer.
www.craigpatterson.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hunt-man
Member
75 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Portland, OR
     
May 31, 2013 12:49 |  #45

FeXL wrote in post #15982744 (external link)
IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

I really like this. Great work and a great thread.


What fixer should I use on my digital pictures???
Canon 7D, Canon EF 70-200 2.8 L IS II, EF-S Canon 10-22 3.5 USM, EF Canon 100 2.8 Macro, EF 50 1.8 II, Canon 28-135 3.5 IS Kit. Soon a EF 11-24 F4 USM. Canon G12.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,022 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Can I post a Raw and ask how you would PP?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1085 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.