Guys, im on this decision that i can't do with out your help. Im using T3i and i will use this for family party and to my kids school event. Now please help me pick one. 17-40L or 24-105L?
lightfighter6 Senior Member 270 posts Joined Jan 2011 Location: illonois More info | May 29, 2013 23:45 | #1 Guys, im on this decision that i can't do with out your help. Im using T3i and i will use this for family party and to my kids school event. Now please help me pick one. 17-40L or 24-105L? 6D,70D, 24-70 f/2.8 L, 70-200 f/2.8 L, 100 macro L, Tokina 11-16 f2.8, 50 f/1.8,Konova slider, 430EXii ,GoPro3 Black,Dji Phantom quad Helicopter.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
treck_dialect Senior Member 689 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: QC Philippines More info | May 29, 2013 23:47 | #2 for what its worth, i dont think 24mm on a crop is wide enough so that might be an issue when working in small spaces. well hello
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 29, 2013 23:53 | #3 I have and love both lenses but don't find either work for me as well on a crop camera like yours (they're both great on full frame or 1.3). Why not the 17-55 2.8 IS? http://www.colorblindedphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
paul-t Goldmember 1,871 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: The deep south, that's the deep south of England. More info | May 29, 2013 23:57 | #4 I use the 17-40L on both crop and FF camera's, and I love it. Tried the 24-105L, loved the extra reach but found it not wide enough, between the 2 go 17-40L.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
halitime Goldmember 1,271 posts Likes: 19 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Lantzville B.C. Can. More info | May 30, 2013 00:08 | #5 EFS 15-85 may work for you. Gear List : 1D MK II n,Gripped XSi,70-200 f4,300 f4 IS,Canon 24-105 f4,35 f2 IS,EF 50 1.8 MK I,EF-S 10-22,Canon 1.4 II Extender,Canon 25mm Ext Tube,YN 468/460 II,RF 602's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | May 30, 2013 00:47 | #6 Tamron 17-50 non-VC or Sigma 17-50 OS. You'll be thankful for the better range and faster aperture on your camera for those intended uses. -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BFox549 Senior Member 316 posts Joined Mar 2012 Location: Charleston, SC More info | May 30, 2013 00:56 | #7 the tamron is sharp and the 2.8 aperature is nice, but its loud and it's AF is not that great. i've read the sigma is great though. Canon 85 1.8, 430exII... No Camera ATM lolol
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dynamitetony Goldmember 1,023 posts Likes: 30 Joined Sep 2007 Location: london UK More info | May 30, 2013 02:34 | #9 only you can decide what you need more, Wide or Reach 5Dmk4 : 5Dmk3: Sigma 24mm F1.4 :Sigma 35mm F1.4 : Canon 50mm F1.4 : Canon 85mm F1.8 : Canon 100mm F2.8 Macro : Canon 24-105 F4 : Canon 70-200 F2.8L mkii : Flashes, lights & Stuff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pdrober2 Goldmember 2,318 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: Durham, NC More info | May 30, 2013 07:07 | #10 if you are shooting school events and parties, i would get the 24-105 over the 17-40. Fujifilm X-T1 | 23 | 27 | 56 | 90 | 55-200
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LowriderS10 Cream of the Crop 10,170 posts Likes: 12 Joined Mar 2008 Location: South Korea / Canada More info | Bianchi wrote in post #15981593 Go to the lens sample page and check out Canon 15-85 17-55 Sigma and Tamaron 17-50 This, but *Tamron. -=Prints For Sale at PIXELS=-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 30, 2013 08:33 | #12 Oh man, this is really hard to decide. what a close fight. the thing about the 24-105 is a kit lense. kit lense? 6D,70D, 24-70 f/2.8 L, 70-200 f/2.8 L, 100 macro L, Tokina 11-16 f2.8, 50 f/1.8,Konova slider, 430EXii ,GoPro3 Black,Dji Phantom quad Helicopter.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LowriderS10 Cream of the Crop 10,170 posts Likes: 12 Joined Mar 2008 Location: South Korea / Canada More info | May 30, 2013 10:05 | #14 lightfighter6 wrote in post #15982162 Oh man, this is really hard to decide. what a close fight. the thing about the 24-105 is a kit lense. kit lense? What does that have to do with anything? It comes as a kit with some of the very high end stuff...doesn't mean it's a bad lens. -=Prints For Sale at PIXELS=-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | May 30, 2013 10:09 | #15 There really isnt much reason to buy a 17-40 for a crop camera. There are better options for the crop in a similar price range like the 17-55 2.8 IS.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is EBiffany 1381 guests, 111 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||