Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 31 May 2013 (Friday) 12:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

New monitor... and now ? PP again ?

 
Alarm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Jul 26, 2013 23:53 |  #31

Amamba wrote in post #16157032 (external link)
#3 I can very well see the threads in tire on the right of the red area, barely the ones on the left - but still can see them.

If you can see them then i have a serious problem and should not start editing yet :)

I will give a try to connect the monitor on another machine to exclude that the gpu cannot handle well the monitor.


:: Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alarm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Aug 05, 2013 11:40 |  #32

Since my laptop has no DVI output,
i connected my laptop with a HDMI-to-DVI cable.

The results were still the same...

I want to hope that its not my VGA, else i will need a new notebook.


:: Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ejenner
Goldmember
Avatar
3,867 posts
Gallery: 98 photos
Likes: 1136
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Denver, CO
     
Aug 05, 2013 23:43 as a reply to  @ Alarm's post |  #33

Yea, I can see details in all those areas and my monitor is set properly dark (if that makes sense) - actually I can still see details if I make the monitor much much darker than it should be.


Edward Jenner
5DIV, M6, GX1 II, Sig15mm FE, 16-35 F4,TS-E 17, TS-E 24, 35 f2 IS, M11-22, M18-150 ,24-105, T45 1.8VC, 70-200 f4 IS, 70-200 2.8 vII, Sig 85 1.4, 100L, 135L, 400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alarm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Aug 11, 2013 08:02 |  #34

Still i had no chance to connect my monitor on another machine to find where the problem is.
Since both vga and hdmi made no difference, the problem is not in the connection.

The only way i can reduce the problem is to increase gamma and brightness from nvidia control, but then i got my colors washed out.

On the monitors default profile, all that information is gone..


:: Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alarm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Aug 24, 2013 10:46 |  #35

Final test failed as well.... unfortunately.

I plugged the monitor on another notebook. While on the notebook i could see the black detail, on dell the results were exactly the same as they were on my notebook.

Lots of lost black information even with the monitor being sunbright at 100% brightness.

After so many tests and waste of time, i guess its time to contact with Dell.

I am not sure what they do in such a scenario, and how they confirm that what i see is not what i should exactly see.

Please enlighten me on that.


:: Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alarm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Oct 02, 2013 13:41 |  #36

Οk, so here we are still fighting with that problem.

I am still not convinced that my monitor shows correctly the dark grey (almost black) colors...
Today i got a calibration device which a tried.

The results seem to be pretty fine. Unfortunately i don't have the screenshot of the second mesurement , although the results of the first are pretty much the same (a bit worse cause of the ambient light).


Of course there is something weird that happened. After the calibration, the exported profile was really messed up on whites. It reduced the Kelvin dramaticaly making my monitor yellowish. That something i cannot understand.

The rest shows to be fine. Although i am still convinced that there is something wrong with the dark greys when i compare it with many other monitors where i can see all that dark information and in mine its just a plain black.

So here we are.

Results:

IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img600/2896/z6mo.jpg

Total black:
IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img823/9867/0lwj.jpg

Pretty black :D
IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img844/4492/gh2s.jpg


Here is my monitor with the default profile for white: 7300 K (I got my monitor set on 6500K)
IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img196/3276/0x5n.jpg


And here with the yellowish as suggested from the device: 5000 K (I got my monitor set on 6500K)
IMAGE: http://imageshack.us/a/img30/6152/n48a.jpg

The profile did surely not fix anything in the dark greys. On the other side it turned my white into a very warm white.


An example image is the following that i see totally different on other monitors.
Inside the big red circle there is some information of shadows and other patterns the metal does.
On my monitor that is a solid black color. Do you see the same ?

IMAGE: http://img809.imageshack.us/img809/9851/e7az.jpg


Any kind of help would be highly appreciated. I honestly don't know what to do anymore and i am afraid of editing my images on that monitor.

Thank you in advance


PS. Just did a further test in photoshop. I put RGB in a gradient in following 0,0,0 next to it 2,2,2 and last 5,5,5 . From 0 to 2 i could not see any difference, just from 0 to 5 . So that i could see some difference i should increase the gamma on my nVidia panel to 1.4 , which washed all the other colours out.

:: Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
commonjunks
Senior Member
Avatar
588 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Oct 2009
     
Oct 02, 2013 23:07 |  #37

I am using Samsung SyncMaster SA5500 and Spyder3 Pro.
Here is how i see on my pc (taken pictures with camera).

With Calibration off

IMAGE: http://i.imgur.com/uL3Wnal.jpg
With Calibration on
IMAGE: http://i.imgur.com/Q4mCDd7.jpg

5D3|35L|50f1.8II|580EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alarm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Oct 03, 2013 01:47 |  #38

commonjunks wrote in post #16342372 (external link)
I am using Samsung SyncMaster SA5500 and Spyder3 Pro.
Here is how i see on my pc (taken pictures with camera).

With Calibration off
QUOTED IMAGE
With Calibration on
QUOTED IMAGE


commonjunks thank you very much.

What i see also on my monitor is the second image you posted, the calibrated one.
Where on other monitors i see more detail as you do also on the first image.

I am not sure anymore what is correct....


:: Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alarm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Oct 04, 2013 01:05 |  #39

Anybody ? :)


:: Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Oct 04, 2013 18:57 |  #40

Alarm wrote in post #16344955 (external link)
Anybody ? :)

Sorry I can't be of much help, but offhand I'd suspect your contrast setting...?

Maybe if you post a link to the original shot people could jump in?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alarm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Oct 05, 2013 13:10 |  #41

tonylong wrote in post #16346793 (external link)
Sorry I can't be of much help, but offhand I'd suspect your contrast setting...?

Maybe if you post a link to the original shot people could jump in?


well the contrast on my monitor is something that i tried. from 1% to 100% . nothing changed with the blacks.

what i see is the same as commonjunks View Post second calibrated image.
which to my eyes is wrong as it loses a lot of dark information. I might be wrong though.


what do you mean with the original shot ? on which image do you refer ? sorry didn't understand.

thank you for the answer


:: Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Oct 05, 2013 15:08 |  #42

Alarm wrote in post #16348197 (external link)
what do you mean with the original shot ? on which image do you refer ? sorry didn't understand.

thank you for the answer

By "original" I mean upload and post a link to the out-of-camera shot with no editing done.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alarm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Oct 06, 2013 02:42 |  #43

tonylong wrote in post #16348412 (external link)
By "original" I mean upload and post a link to the out-of-camera shot with no editing done.

Ok, if i understood well.

Here we are. Do not mind the colors. My camera could not reproduce them well in the way i see them. The blacks are though pretty similar to what i see on my monitor as well. The jpegs are unprocessed exports from raws. Since the images are too big i post just the url to the images

Original image 1:
http://imageshack.us/a​/img694/1552/e6og.jpg (external link)

What i see from my monitor.
http://imageshack.us/a​/img266/5517/ho7z.jpg (external link)


Oringal Image 2:
http://imageshack.us/a​/img89/5493/81ho.jpg (external link)

What i see from my monitor
http://imageshack.us/a​/img594/8600/f4db.jpg (external link)


As i said to my previous post. the results with my monitor look much like the ones of
commonjunks that were posted.


:: Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightstalker
Goldmember
1,666 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2007
Location: North West UK
     
Oct 06, 2013 04:34 |  #44

What do the images look like when you print them?


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alarm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Oct 06, 2013 05:20 |  #45

Nightstalker wrote in post #16349427 (external link)
What do the images look like when you print them?

I havent tried that. I aint got a printer.

As i said. I got a replacement (monitor), the blacks were the same.
Checked the blacks on a mid-range LG , they looked a bit better. more detail.
Checked the blacks on a low range dell and lg, there was more black information (which i dont know if it was correct.

On this page... http://www.lagom.nl …t/black.php#bla​cktest.png (external link)
i can see a tiny difference between 1 and 3 . 2 seems identical to 1.

I don't know. Maybe its just my mind and got used on crappy monitor that i could see things i should not.


:: Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,321 views & 1 like for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
New monitor... and now ? PP again ?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1061 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.