Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 31 May 2013 (Friday) 12:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

New monitor... and now ? PP again ?

 
Nightstalker
Goldmember
1,666 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2007
Location: North West UK
     
Oct 06, 2013 09:05 |  #46

The chances are that the low end monitors you are trying are displaying too bright.

The reason for calibrating is generally to get a better match to prints as with prints you can control what the end user gets to see.

If you are processing for web display only then calibration is significantly less important as you have precisely zero control of what the end user gets to see - most people will have un-calibrated displays that have never been adjusted since being un boxed.

My recommendation would be to get your sample images printed out at a decent size (say 12x8 or larger) from a reputable lab and see what they come back like.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightstalker
Goldmember
1,666 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2007
Location: North West UK
     
Oct 06, 2013 09:23 |  #47

Alarm wrote in post #16349462 (external link)
I havent tried that. I aint got a printer.

As i said. I got a replacement (monitor), the blacks were the same.
Checked the blacks on a mid-range LG , they looked a bit better. more detail.
Checked the blacks on a low range dell and lg, there was more black information (which i dont know if it was correct.

On this page... http://www.lagom.nl …t/black.php#bla​cktest.png (external link)
i can see a tiny difference between 1 and 3 . 2 seems identical to 1.

I don't know. Maybe its just my mind and got used on crappy monitor that i could see things i should not.

I've just looked at that website on an iPad mini and 1-5 appear identical, I start to see a slight difference on number 6.

With my iPhone 5 I see a difference at 3.

On my calibrated DELL 2711 I can see a difference at 2.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
catclaw
Senior Member
344 posts
Joined Apr 2014
     
Apr 18, 2014 06:57 |  #48
bannedPermanent ban

This was such a good find. I appreciated reading this.


TriExposure (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alarm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
232 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Apr 28, 2014 02:32 |  #49

catclaw wrote in post #16843156 (external link)
This was such a good find. I appreciated reading this.

Better late than never. I just had to post process most of my images again because of that.

Now i own a new laptop, but i am aware that it saturates colors more and has more contrast, so i just do the major processing on the laptop but never export them until i go home and open the images on a decent monitor.

Working on a non calibrated monitor is just useless. You spend hours or better said days and you finally see that all the images that you edit are totally wrong or not as expected.


:: Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bobster
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,668 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 3302
Joined May 2006
Location: Dorset, England
     
Apr 29, 2014 20:08 |  #50

try the Monitor brightness @ 22 and contrast at 75
http://www.tftcentral.​co.uk/articles/icc_pro​files.htm (external link)


Robert Whetton (external link) Dorset Portrait & Events Photographer | Photoshop Guru
Gear | Gram (external link) | Ultimate Lens MA FoCal 2 (external link)| Ultimate RAW Editor C1 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RandMan
Senior Member
Avatar
403 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Boston, MA
     
Apr 30, 2014 23:17 |  #51

Alarm wrote in post #16349462 (external link)
I havent tried that. I aint got a printer.

Do yourself a huge favor and get yourself a couple of test prints - it can really put things into perspective. Heck, even Costco does pretty darn good prints - I was in a pickle a couple of months ago and rushed over there to get a 12x18 printed. Price? Less than two bucks. Yes, for a 12x18.

So what I say is: pick 3 or 4 of your images, edit them on your monitor, then find somewhere that can get you good prints for a few bucks. Hold the prints up side by side to the monitor and see where you're at.


Canon eos7D | Canon 50mm 1.4 | Canon 17-55mm 2.8 | Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 | Yongnuo 565ex | Yongnuo yn-468 II | Canon ef28-135mm 3.5/5.6 | Canon ef-s 55-250mm 4.0/5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,319 views & 1 like for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
New monitor... and now ? PP again ?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1061 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.