Anyone using this yet? Opinions? Looks interesting, and I played around with a trial, even with heavy adjustments, there was no halo-ing (sp?). Just wondering what others are thinking about it.
KirkS518 Goldmember 3,983 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2012 Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh More info | Jun 02, 2013 08:15 | #1 Anyone using this yet? Opinions? Looks interesting, and I played around with a trial, even with heavy adjustments, there was no halo-ing (sp?). Just wondering what others are thinking about it. If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EL_PIC Goldmember 2,028 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Austin Texas - Lucca Italy More info | Jun 02, 2013 09:07 | #2 Permanent banMost enhancement filters add halos and loss of detail. EL_PIC - RIT BS Photo '78 - Photomask Engineering Mgr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KirkS518 THREAD STARTER Goldmember 3,983 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2012 Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh More info | Jun 02, 2013 09:28 | #3 Ok. The first is SOOC, second is 100% bump (1.00) in 'Micro Contrast', 'Low Contrast', 'Medium Contrast', and 'High Contrast'. Third is a preset called 'Hummingbird II'. No other adjustments of any kind were applied, other than 'Save for Web' conversion to jpeg. Any halos? Full Contrast Preset If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
agedbriar Goldmember 2,657 posts Likes: 399 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Slovenia More info | Jun 02, 2013 13:55 | #4 I bought it a few days ago and I really like the control over the range the contrast enhancement is applied on as well as results quality.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
agedbriar Goldmember 2,657 posts Likes: 399 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Slovenia More info | Jun 04, 2013 07:33 | #5 Anyone interested in Topaz Clarity should also try their sister product Topaz Detail, another very good enhancer of image technical aspect.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EL_PIC Goldmember 2,028 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Austin Texas - Lucca Italy More info | Jun 06, 2013 11:04 | #6 Permanent banloss of detail EL_PIC - RIT BS Photo '78 - Photomask Engineering Mgr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Numenorean Cream of the Crop 5,013 posts Likes: 28 Joined Feb 2011 More info | Jun 06, 2013 11:21 | #7 The edits look like crap. Hard to improve something with PP when it doesn't start out good.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
agedbriar Goldmember 2,657 posts Likes: 399 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Slovenia More info | Jun 06, 2013 13:26 | #8 EL_PIC wrote in post #16005661 loss of detail Can you point it out on pict. #3 ?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KirkS518 THREAD STARTER Goldmember 3,983 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2012 Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh More info | Jun 06, 2013 16:14 | #9 Numenorean wrote in post #16005701 The edits look like crap. Hard to improve something with PP when it doesn't start out good. I've said it before, and I'll say it again... You weren't hugged enough as a child. 4100+ posts, and they're all negative, without anything constructive. If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1871 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||