Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 03 Jun 2013 (Monday) 13:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Image size affects battery life

 
Madweasel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,224 posts
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Fareham, UK
     
Jun 03, 2013 13:46 |  #1

I did a quick search to see if anyone had spoken of this before, but didn't see anything. Maybe it's a well-known fact, and probably the time-lapsers already know it, but here's the story. I set up my 7D with a fresh battery to do some time-lapse shooting. As it would only be used for making a video output I set the camera to shoot small jpegs (still higher resolution than HDTV), and used the timer-controller to take a single exposure every 5 seconds. When I came to stop the camera 3 hours later, it had taken 2,294 exposures, and still had plenty of battery left according to the display.

I would have thought that file size wouldn't make much impact when compared with the draw on the battery of firing the shutter and processing the image, but the 7D normally reckons to manage 1000-1100 shots when shooting RAW. I guess that compressing down to jpeg doesn't use much juice, but writing to the card must be quite an effort, which is then much reduced when the file is so much smaller (each image was about 1.2 MB.

Although I've been shooting Canon digital for the past 7 years I've never come across this fact. Has anyone else?


Mark.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,717 posts
Likes: 4035
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jun 03, 2013 13:52 |  #2

I would think that file size has nothing to do with battery life as all the processing needed to make either a large or small image is the same. There may be a slight savings due to the fewer memory writes but that has to be counted in a handful of electrons.

What I think you are seeing is that you are saving a lot of electrons because you are not focusing between each shot. Moving the lens takes a lot of power and as you are time lapsing, I'm guessing you focused and left it be. Also, you are not re-metering between each shot either. That has to save some power. And lastly, though you don't mention it, you probably had the rear LCD turned off (just guessing) as there is no need to review each shot. The LCD consumes loads of power..


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Madweasel
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,224 posts
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Fareham, UK
     
Jun 03, 2013 14:00 |  #3

Good point about AF. For the first few shots I forgot and left it on, but saw it was adjusting so switched it off. I also realised too late that I should also have switched off the instant preview, so that was still left on, but it's only set to 2 seconds. The mode was left to Av, so it was actually metering each shot. I had assumed the difference was due to memory writes, but maybe it's lens focusing. The lens didn't have IS either.


Mark.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

573 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
Image size affects battery life
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1554 guests, 143 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.