Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 05 Jun 2013 (Wednesday) 18:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Can you use speedlite with ND filter?

 
kaitlyn2004
Goldmember
1,694 posts
Likes: 204
Joined Oct 2009
     
Jun 05, 2013 18:12 |  #1

Say you are using a 3-stop ND filter outside to combat the bright day

At that point, aren't you restricted in being unable to use the speedlite? Wouldn't it need to produce 3-stops stronger brightness to still light up the subject? Speedlites have enough trouble with bright sun... it is impossible if you add a ND into the mix, isn't it?


My Landscape Photography Videos (external link)
My Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,932 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2276
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Jun 05, 2013 18:23 |  #2

You will open up the aperture by three stops to accommodate the ND filter. The issue is whether the speed light has enough power to overcome the sun for the lighting scenario you're you're shooting in without the ND filter.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidmtml
Senior Member
Avatar
848 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 390
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Montana
     
Jun 05, 2013 18:25 |  #3

windpig wrote in post #16003611 (external link)
You will open up the aperture by three stops to accommodate the ND filter. The issue is whether the speed light has enough power to overcome the sun for the lighting scenario you're you're shooting in without the ND filter.

This is the reason that using a ND is usually a better option than HSS, with a 3 stop filter, you lose 3 stops of light, but you can open up your aperture by 3 stops, and basically come out even. With HSS, you lose a lot more power.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kaitlyn2004
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,694 posts
Likes: 204
Joined Oct 2009
     
Jun 05, 2013 18:37 |  #4

Oh... maybe I'm mistunderstanding then

Adding the ND filter - I don't actually have to adjust flash power AT ALL?


My Landscape Photography Videos (external link)
My Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abbadon31
Goldmember
Avatar
4,997 posts
Gallery: 264 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 6767
Joined Jul 2009
Location: SOCAL
     
Jun 05, 2013 18:55 |  #5

Example:

Flash set to full power at 5 feet =f/16 can camera at f/16 you get proper exposure.
Nd filter will drop the camera down to f/5.6 your flash will stay the same at f/16


I AM SHOM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidmtml
Senior Member
Avatar
848 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 390
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Montana
     
Jun 05, 2013 18:58 |  #6

kaitlyn2004 wrote in post #16003643 (external link)
Oh... maybe I'm mistunderstanding then

Adding the ND filter - I don't actually have to adjust flash power AT ALL?

So if you are using a 3 stop filter, there are a few different scenarios here...

If you leave your camera settings the same, and the flash power the same, then everything will be three stops underexposed.

If you leave the camera settings the same, but bump up the flash by three stops, the ambient/background will drop by 3 stops, and your subject, or anything else lit by the speedlite will be back up to the original exposure.

If you open up your aperture 3 stops, say from f8 to f2.8, but leave the shutter speed and flash power at their original values, you will get the same exposure as not using the ND filter at all, but have the advantage of a thinner DOF.

I am confusing myself even as I write this haha...does that make sense??




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kaitlyn2004
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,694 posts
Likes: 204
Joined Oct 2009
     
Jun 05, 2013 19:04 |  #7

davidmtml wrote in post #16003692 (external link)
So if you are using a 3 stop filter, there are a few different scenarios here...

If you leave your camera settings the same, and the flash power the same, then everything will be three stops underexposed.

If you leave the camera settings the same, but bump up the flash by three stops, the ambient/background will drop by 3 stops, and your subject, or anything else lit by the speedlite will be back up to the original exposure.

If you open up your aperture 3 stops, say from f8 to f2.8, but leave the shutter speed and flash power at their original values, you will get the same exposure as not using the ND filter at all, but have the advantage of a thinner DOF.

I am confusing myself even as I write this haha...does that make sense??

Perfect sense. When I originally played it in my head I naturally thought that the flash needed to adjust as well, but of course adjusting of the aperture takes care of that


My Landscape Photography Videos (external link)
My Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Corbeau
Senior Member
Avatar
377 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Ottawa, Ont, Great White North
     
Jun 05, 2013 19:12 |  #8

Thanks for explaining it in terms of three scenarios, David...


Look and think before opening the shutter. The heart and mind are the true lens of the camera. -- Yousuf Karsh

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Jun 05, 2013 23:09 |  #9

ND filter doesn't help kill ambient, period. It only helps you use wider apertures using strobe/flashes in bright ambient when you limited by your max sync speed. It lowers flash as well as ambient so your flash has to have more power than ambient light at the moment.

I have hard time bringing in ambient down with my 640ws Einstein. This when using Kacey BD in full sun at noon. Not sure how measly 60-80ws speedlite will help.

Using flash at max power without any modifier will provide the best bang. Use ND filter to use wider aperture that is all.

Old shots. Without ND filter, strobe matched to ambient meant I had to use something like f9 which makes for ugly bg.

IMAGE: http://www.bobbyzphotography.com/img/s2/v4/p145115903-5.jpg

Add 3 stop ND filter and shoot at f3.2 with better bg. No change in flash settings etc. Only aperture change on the camera.
IMAGE: http://www.bobbyzphotography.com/img/s9/v16/p9114399-5.jpg

Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidmtml
Senior Member
Avatar
848 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 390
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Montana
     
Jun 05, 2013 23:25 |  #10

bobbyz wrote in post #16004313 (external link)
ND filter doesn't help kill ambient, period. It only helps you use wider apertures using strobe/flashes in bright ambient when you limited by your max sync speed. It lowers flash as well as ambient so your flash has to have more power than ambient light at the moment.

I have hard time bringing in ambient down with my 640ws Einstein. This when using Kacey BD in full sun at noon. Not sure how measly 60-80ws speedlite will help.

Using flash at max power without any modifier will provide the best bang. Use ND filter to use wider aperture that is all.

Old shots. Without ND filter, strobe matched to ambient meant I had to use something like f9 which makes for ugly bg.
QUOTED IMAGE

Add 3 stop ND filter and shoot at f3.2 with better bg. No change in flash settings etc. Only aperture change on the camera.
QUOTED IMAGE

I understand what you are saying, but saying that "ND filter doesn't help kill ambient, period" is incorrect.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abbadon31
Goldmember
Avatar
4,997 posts
Gallery: 264 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 6767
Joined Jul 2009
Location: SOCAL
     
Jun 05, 2013 23:41 |  #11

All a ND filter is sunglasses for your lens, so you can work at sync speed when using flash / use more open aperture / Shoot longer exposures in sunlight


I AM SHOM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,932 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2276
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Jun 06, 2013 07:00 |  #12

davidmtml wrote in post #16004346 (external link)
I understand what you are saying, but saying that "ND filter doesn't help kill ambient, period" is incorrect.

Well then it kills ambient as much as stopping down or increasing shutter speed does. In the context of the original question though, nd filters do not effect ambient.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jun 06, 2013 07:18 |  #13

Of course an ND filter will affect the ambient light. That's what it was designed to do. After all, it's not like it's a piece of clear glass so it will inhibit some light from passing through it. But it will affect the flash light passing through it equally as well. :)

Regarding the question of whether an ND filter can be used with a hotshoe flash or not, the answer, of course, will depend on what the OP intends to do with the ND filter, as was pointed out by David in post #6, and the power range the flash was working at prior to the filter being used.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,932 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2276
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Jun 06, 2013 07:40 |  #14

PacAce wrote in post #16004985 (external link)
as was pointed out by David in post #6, and the power range the flash was working at prior to the filter being used.

Uh, Leo, that was pointed out by the brainiac in post #2:lol::lol::lol:


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Jun 06, 2013 08:16 |  #15

davidmtml wrote in post #16004346 (external link)
I understand what you are saying, but saying that "ND filter doesn't help kill ambient, period" is incorrect.

Let us say my flash gives me f16 at distance I am shooting, ISO100, Max power on flash. Sunny 16 gives ambient at f16, 1/100, ISO100. So tell how ND filter helps.:)

Power of the flash helps you kill ambient. ND filter just lets you shoot at wider aperture that is all. I can shoot at f32 if I got power to burn. And if I had camera which could sync at any shutter speed then ND filter will be worthless for portrait shooters using strobes.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,810 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Can you use speedlite with ND filter?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1614 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.