Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 06 Jun 2013 (Thursday) 21:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Non-convert RAW images go under exposed when I load to LR

 
theantiquetiger
Senior Member
Avatar
506 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 225
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Dutchtown, LA
     
Jun 06, 2013 21:18 |  #1

I see my images in Cannon Digital Photo Professional, they look good. If I don't convert to jpg, the RAW image darkens like it is under exposed and if I increase the exposure in LR, it looks bad.

If I convert and save from RAW to jpg and than load into LR, it is fine.

Any idea what I am doing wrong?


---------------
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/theantiquetiger​/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4608
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Jun 06, 2013 21:37 |  #2

Lightroom can't read you're in camera settings so it takes the raw file and applied it's own default settings to it when it renders the image.
DPP can read your in camera preferences and applies them to the raw image. The raw image in DPP should look like the in camera jpeg preview.


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
theantiquetiger
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
506 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 225
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Dutchtown, LA
     
Jun 06, 2013 21:49 |  #3

Scatterbrained wrote in post #16007360 (external link)
Lightroom can't read you're in camera settings so it takes the raw file and applied it's own default settings to it when it renders the image.
DPP can read your in camera preferences and applies them to the raw image. The raw image in DPP should look like the in camera jpeg preview.

so convert to tiff before loading to LR?


---------------
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/theantiquetiger​/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4608
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Jun 06, 2013 21:59 |  #4

Or just open in Lr and process it there. The power of Lr is as a raw processor. If you're going to use DPP for processing your raw images you might as well get PsE instead of Lr.


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Jun 06, 2013 22:01 |  #5

Lightroom - like all other third-party raw converters - is designed to read only a limited subset of your in-camera settings; ISO, aperture, shutter speed, and White Balance. All other camera settings are ignored so if your raw files are appearing darker in Lightroom it means that you probably have a setting like Auto Lighting Optimizer enabled in your camera.

theantiquetiger wrote in post #16007325 (external link)
I see my images in Cannon Digital Photo Professional, they look good. If I don't convert to jpg, the RAW image darkens like it is under exposed and if I increase the exposure in LR, it looks bad.

If I convert and save from RAW to jpg and than load into LR, it is fine.

Any idea what I am doing wrong?


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
theantiquetiger
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
506 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 225
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Dutchtown, LA
     
Jun 06, 2013 22:08 |  #6

PixelMagic wrote in post #16007416 (external link)
Lightroom - All other camera settings are ignored so if your raw files are appearing darker in Lightroom it means that you probably have a setting like Auto Lighting Optimizer enabled in your camera.

It only seems to do it with skin tones


---------------
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/theantiquetiger​/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4608
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Jun 06, 2013 22:14 |  #7

theantiquetiger wrote in post #16007434 (external link)
It only seems to do it with skin tones

Different picture styles effect color relationships. Landscape lends a blue bias for example. Lr can't read these styles, it takes the raw data and interprets it in it's own way, using the Adobe Standard as a default profile. The only image specific setting that Lr reads and renders is white balance. You can try using different camera profiles in Lr to see what works best, as well as trying a custom profile with a tool like the Color Checker Passport.


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Jun 07, 2013 07:24 |  #8

theantiquetiger wrote in post #16007390 (external link)
so convert to tiff before loading to LR?

No. Create a set of default settings for LR that will more closely approximate what you require in the final image.

Find a representative image, not over or under-exposed, a decent range from blacks to whites, with a good selection of clours. Tweak the LR 'Basic', 'Detail' and 'Camera Calibration' settings in the 'Develop' module until the image looks its best. Then, still in the 'Develop' module, hold the 'Alt' key. You'll see the button in the bottom right change from 'Reset' to 'Set Default...'. Press that button and the settings you've chosen will be applied to every new image. There are options to have a different default for different cameras and ISO values - so you may have to do it a few times, or change those options in Edit | Preferences | Presets.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IslandCrow
Senior Member
Avatar
589 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Rapid City, SD
     
Jun 07, 2013 09:54 |  #9

hollis_f wrote in post #16008270 (external link)
No. Create a set of default settings for LR that will more closely approximate what you require in the final image.

Find a representative image, not over or under-exposed, a decent range from blacks to whites, with a good selection of clours. Tweak the LR 'Basic', 'Detail' and 'Camera Calibration' settings in the 'Develop' module until the image looks its best. Then, still in the 'Develop' module, hold the 'Alt' key. You'll see the button in the bottom right change from 'Reset' to 'Set Default...'. Press that button and the settings you've chosen will be applied to every new image. There are options to have a different default for different cameras and ISO values - so you may have to do it a few times, or change those options in Edit | Preferences | Presets.

That's similar to what I do. One of the really nice things about Lightroom is when I shoot raw (which is almost always), I could care less about picture style defaults in the camera, because I can create as many of my own in Lightroom as I want. For example, some of the presets I have are sports (daytime, nighttime and indoors), landscape, candid, street, various monochrome, and quite a few more. And I have those (or some subset) for my 5D, 40D and P&S cameras. When I import my raw files into Lightroom, I have it apply the appropriate preset, and now, depending on the picture, often all I have left to do is crop, possibly apply a white balance setting, and make a few minor tweaks.

So, I do understand why some people always use the Canon software for the initial RAW conversion, but for me, I consider the proprietary information that the Adobe software can't read is pretty insignificant.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jun 07, 2013 18:46 |  #10

As a "reference" between DPP and Lightroom, it could be helpful to experiment with your Picture Styles (if you are working with Raw).

For example, I have my cameras set to the Neutral Picture Style (some prefer Faithful) and I have my Contrast and Saturation dialed all the way back to -4. So, this is what gets "viewed" in DPP when I open/view a Raw file. I find that these settings are fairly close to the Lightroom/Camera Raw defaults (the Adobe Standard profile). Using these settings can avoid the kind of confusion you are having, and of course you can change around the Picture Style settings in DPP as well as the camera profile settings in Lightroom.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snerd
Senior Member
Avatar
669 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 195
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Oklahoma
     
Jun 19, 2013 02:20 |  #11

Thanks for this thread. When developing my new 7D raw files tonight, they looked underexposed and my black leather couch and loveseat had the purple fringe, and on my outside shots, any shadows were purple fringed too. Increasing the black level a couple of notches under Detail fixed it, then I saved it as Default. My first LR expedition!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Jun 19, 2013 02:46 |  #12

Increasing the black level a couple of notches under Detail fixed it, then I saved it as Default.

? ?
Detail is Sharpening (Amount, Radius, Detail, Mask) and Noise Reduction (Luminance: Amount, Detail, Contrast and Color: Amount, Detail). Nothing there to do with black point.
And if you saved the settings as a new default, you should keep in mind that any default is only a starting point and other images may need other settings.

Addendum: For purple fringing there are tools in the Lens Correction section; CA Removal and Fringe Removal.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snerd
Senior Member
Avatar
669 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 195
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Oklahoma
     
Jun 19, 2013 08:36 |  #13

tzalman wrote in post #16044401 (external link)
? ?
Detail is Sharpening (Amount, Radius, Detail, Mask) and Noise Reduction (Luminance: Amount, Detail, Contrast and Color: Amount, Detail). Nothing there to do with black point.
And if you saved the settings as a new default, you should keep in mind that any default is only a starting point and other images may need other settings.

Addendum: For purple fringing there are tools in the Lens Correction section; CA Removal and Fringe Removal.

.............. I have a black......... of course I'm a complete newb to this. Ver 5.

ETA: Oop's. It's under Basic.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/06/3/LQ_653332.jpg
Image hosted by forum (653332) © snerd [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
boerewors
Goldmember
Avatar
1,948 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2009
Location: South African living in Indonesia
     
Jun 19, 2013 08:44 |  #14

tzalman wrote in post #16044401 (external link)
? ?
Detail is Sharpening (Amount, Radius, Detail, Mask) and Noise Reduction (Luminance: Amount, Detail, Contrast and Color: Amount, Detail). Nothing there to do with black point.
And if you saved the settings as a new default, you should keep in mind that any default is only a starting point and other images may need other settings.

Addendum: For purple fringing there are tools in the Lens Correction section; CA Removal and Fringe Removal.

for some weird reason the CA removal does nothing on my images. The fringe removal tool however does a fantastic job.


The most important piece of gear you own, resides in your head and its called your brain.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,635 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2059
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
Jun 19, 2013 22:29 |  #15

boerewors wrote in post #16044849 (external link)
for some weird reason the CA removal does nothing on my images. The fringe removal tool however does a fantastic job.

Do you actually have any CA on your images prior to using it?


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,096 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Non-convert RAW images go under exposed when I load to LR
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1668 guests, 135 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.