Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 07 Jun 2013 (Friday) 00:32
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Which paper/surface for this photo?"
Glossy (e.g. Fujiflex, high-gloss aluminium print)
2
10.5%
Matte
5
26.3%
Lustre
0
0%
Metallic, e.g. Kodak Endura Metallic, Fuji Pearl, metal print with the brushed surface showing through)
11
57.9%
Something else (e.g. canvas)
1
5.3%

19 voters, 19 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which paper for this photo: Metallic, Glossy, Lustre or Matte?

 
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
5,806 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 401
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jun 07, 2013 00:32 |  #1

I normally print everything on metal, but I will soon be making a 30"x90" print of this one on a different medium.

Which surface do you think would suit it best, and why?


IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7151/6803608279_fc9a5c3ec8_o.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,806 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 401
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jun 07, 2013 01:52 |  #2

I should mention that the final image will be mounted, not framed behind glass.

I would have been leaning towards metallic, if it weren't for the large, near-white clay pan covering the bottom third of the image which might show up as a big, silver patch, so I wanted to get some opinions first.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Staszek
Goldmember
Avatar
3,606 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Jun 07, 2013 02:37 |  #3

I like lustre for everything. I just don't like glare from the gloss finishes.


SOSKIphoto (external link) | Blog (external link) | Facebook (external link)| Instagram (external link)
Shooting with big noisy cameras and a bag of primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,806 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 401
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jun 07, 2013 02:44 |  #4

Staszek wrote in post #16007945 (external link)
I like lustre for everything. I just don't like glare from the gloss finishes.

Would it stand out enough in lustre?

I once saw this photo printed in matte at a winners' exhibition for a photo competition, and I thought it looked terrible without any kind of reflective sheen...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Jun 07, 2013 02:49 |  #5

Oh, metal print for sure!

Although I don't see much where bare metal would show.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,806 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 401
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jun 07, 2013 03:02 |  #6

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #16007958 (external link)
Oh, metal print for sure!

Although I don't see much where bare metal would show.

The entire bottom third of the image is very light, near-white in colour.

So far, all the prints I've made from this photo have been on high-gloss metal with a white, non-bare background, and they look good. I assume this would be similar to the glossy print, but even more glossy.

How do you think it would look on the high-gloss bare metal?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 07, 2013 04:19 |  #7

That'd look cool as a metallic. Maybe bring back the highlights of the lower part of the image.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark ­ Vuleta
Goldmember
Avatar
4,238 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 132
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
     
Jun 07, 2013 04:38 |  #8

Have you had anything highly glossy at that size before?? How flat are you able to keep it? Just thinking of reflections affecting the viewing of it.

I actually think it would look good on a matte fine art paper or a canvas. Those big blocks of similar colour work well with those mediums (just my opinion)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,806 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 401
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jun 07, 2013 04:54 |  #9

Mark Vuleta wrote in post #16008058 (external link)
Have you had anything highly glossy at that size before?? How flat are you able to keep it? Just thinking of reflections affecting the viewing of it.

I normally sell my work as dye-sub prints made directly on aluminium, in sizes up to 48"x96", so it's not something I haven't dealt with before. I'll be mounting this one on alupanel, so flatness shouldn't be a problem.

I actually think it would look good on a matte fine art paper or a canvas. Those big blocks of similar colour work well with those mediums (just my opinion)

Don't you think it would look a bit dull? I generally like the contrasty, highly-saturated 'wet' look of high-gloss media, which almost seems to glow under the right lighting. Just thinking aloud, really...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark ­ Vuleta
Goldmember
Avatar
4,238 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 132
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
     
Jun 07, 2013 05:17 |  #10

Cool, you've had experience with them previously. They can certainly get a bit unwieldly at the larger sizes.

As far as the substrate, something like this is purchased to put on display and who ever your client is should (a) advise you of their positioning/lighting or (b) take advise on how best to display it.

Metallic prints are fantastic with the right image displayed correctly to achieve their full effect. However, with the large blocks of very similar colour in this image, I think the subtleties of the colour gradients would be better displayed on a fine art matte paper. These subtleties can get a bit lost in highly glossy surfaces.

However, I suppose it is really up to the client and what they want.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,806 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 401
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jun 07, 2013 05:36 |  #11

Mark Vuleta wrote in post #16008091 (external link)
Cool, you've had experience with them previously. They can certainly get a bit unwieldly at the larger sizes.

As far as the substrate, something like this is purchased to put on display and who ever your client is should (a) advise you of their positioning/lighting or (b) take advise on how best to display it.

Metallic prints are fantastic with the right image displayed correctly to achieve their full effect. However, with the large blocks of very similar colour in this image, I think the subtleties of the colour gradients would be better displayed on a fine art matte paper. These subtleties can get a bit lost in highly glossy surfaces.

However, I suppose it is really up to the client and what they want.

The thing is, it's not for a client - it's for a friend, who is an interior designer in her spare time, but has left it to me to get the photo right! For clients, it's easy, since I only routinely offer it on aluminium (apart from specific custom requests).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,806 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 401
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jun 07, 2013 07:45 |  #12

What about metallic paper with a satin laminate?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jun 07, 2013 09:10 |  #13

I think CVS does a fine job, try them first.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,806 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 401
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jun 07, 2013 09:35 |  #14

Talley wrote in post #16008505 (external link)
I think CVS does a fine job, try them first.

What's CVS?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
g0bl0k
Senior Member
552 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Texas
     
Jun 07, 2013 10:13 |  #15

Shadowblade wrote in post #16008575 (external link)
What's CVS?

He's being sarcastic, CVS is a chain drugstore here in the US. And they're not the place to print nice image like yours.


My Junk

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,860 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Which paper for this photo: Metallic, Glossy, Lustre or Matte?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
672 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.