I normally print everything on metal, but I will soon be making a 30"x90" print of this one on a different medium.
Which surface do you think would suit it best, and why?
| POLL: "Which paper/surface for this photo?" |
Glossy (e.g. Fujiflex, high-gloss aluminium print) | 2 10.5% |
Matte | 5 26.3% |
Lustre | 0 0% |
Metallic, e.g. Kodak Endura Metallic, Fuji Pearl, metal print with the brushed surface showing through) | 11 57.9% |
Something else (e.g. canvas) | 1 5.3% |
Shadowblade Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 07, 2013 00:32 | #1 I normally print everything on metal, but I will soon be making a 30"x90" print of this one on a different medium.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 07, 2013 01:52 | #2 I should mention that the final image will be mounted, not framed behind glass.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Staszek Goldmember 3,606 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2010 Location: San Jose, CA More info | Jun 07, 2013 02:37 | #3 I like lustre for everything. I just don't like glare from the gloss finishes. SOSKIphoto
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 07, 2013 02:44 | #4 Staszek wrote in post #16007945 I like lustre for everything. I just don't like glare from the gloss finishes. Would it stand out enough in lustre?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop" 57,560 posts Likes: 178 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Jun 07, 2013 02:49 | #5 Oh, metal print for sure! Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 07, 2013 03:02 | #6 FlyingPhotog wrote in post #16007958 Oh, metal print for sure! Although I don't see much where bare metal would show. The entire bottom third of the image is very light, near-white in colour.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Jun 07, 2013 04:19 | #7 That'd look cool as a metallic. Maybe bring back the highlights of the lower part of the image. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MarkVuleta Goldmember More info | Jun 07, 2013 04:38 | #8 Have you had anything highly glossy at that size before?? How flat are you able to keep it? Just thinking of reflections affecting the viewing of it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 07, 2013 04:54 | #9 Mark Vuleta wrote in post #16008058 Have you had anything highly glossy at that size before?? How flat are you able to keep it? Just thinking of reflections affecting the viewing of it. I normally sell my work as dye-sub prints made directly on aluminium, in sizes up to 48"x96", so it's not something I haven't dealt with before. I'll be mounting this one on alupanel, so flatness shouldn't be a problem. I actually think it would look good on a matte fine art paper or a canvas. Those big blocks of similar colour work well with those mediums (just my opinion) Don't you think it would look a bit dull? I generally like the contrasty, highly-saturated 'wet' look of high-gloss media, which almost seems to glow under the right lighting. Just thinking aloud, really...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MarkVuleta Goldmember More info | Jun 07, 2013 05:17 | #10 Cool, you've had experience with them previously. They can certainly get a bit unwieldly at the larger sizes.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 07, 2013 05:36 | #11 Mark Vuleta wrote in post #16008091 Cool, you've had experience with them previously. They can certainly get a bit unwieldly at the larger sizes. As far as the substrate, something like this is purchased to put on display and who ever your client is should (a) advise you of their positioning/lighting or (b) take advise on how best to display it. Metallic prints are fantastic with the right image displayed correctly to achieve their full effect. However, with the large blocks of very similar colour in this image, I think the subtleties of the colour gradients would be better displayed on a fine art matte paper. These subtleties can get a bit lost in highly glossy surfaces. However, I suppose it is really up to the client and what they want. The thing is, it's not for a client - it's for a friend, who is an interior designer in her spare time, but has left it to me to get the photo right! For clients, it's easy, since I only routinely offer it on aluminium (apart from specific custom requests).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 07, 2013 07:45 | #12 What about metallic paper with a satin laminate?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 07, 2013 09:10 | #13 I think CVS does a fine job, try them first. A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 07, 2013 09:35 | #14 Talley wrote in post #16008505 I think CVS does a fine job, try them first. What's CVS?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
g0bl0k Senior Member 552 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: Texas More info | Jun 07, 2013 10:13 | #15 Shadowblade wrote in post #16008575 What's CVS? He's being sarcastic, CVS is a chain drugstore here in the US. And they're not the place to print nice image like yours.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 672 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||