Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 13 Jun 2013 (Thursday) 10:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Bride Cancels Wedding, Wants Depsoit Back

 
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jun 15, 2013 17:29 |  #61

elrey2375 wrote in post #16034043 (external link)
And this is also a good example of why you NEVER tell them how many photos you took.

No, but they gotta be aware of the difference between 13 and 100.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elrey2375
Thinks it's irresponsible
Avatar
4,992 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 279
Joined Nov 2011
     
Jun 16, 2013 02:05 |  #62

gonzogolf wrote in post #16034235 (external link)
No, but they gotta be aware of the difference between 13 and 100.

13 out of 100 might be a good number. Eyes that are closed, something weird about expression, hair in the wrong place, etc. After you whittle out the ones that don't make the cut, 13 out of 100 could be good, you never know


http://emjfotografi.co​m/ (external link)
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografi (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
placidbabe
Member
75 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Australia, NSW
     
Jun 16, 2013 02:44 |  #63

On your blog it says the Engagement Sessions are 2 hours long. Did you photograph for 2 hours? If you didn't, and she only received 13 photos with less then 2 hours of shooting, I'd say just give back 50% of the deposit, which I would guess would be $55? (Engagement Session :$220. Deposit is 50% $110)

You still get paid, though not as much as you'd like. But is it really worth $55 to make this such a huge deal? I don't think she is being unreasonable. She isn't asking for ALL the money back. She understands you gave a service and deserve to be paid for it, though a service she is not happy with.


Skye.

Canon EOS 5D Mark II ~ Canon EOS 50D
Canon 24-105 mm f/4 L | Canon 100-400mm L | Canon 135mm f/2 L | Canon 50mm f/1.8 II | Sigma 70-200 mm f/2.8 OS | Tamron 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro | Canon Speedlite 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
philwillmedia
Cream of the Crop
5,253 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 25
Joined Nov 2008
Location: "...just south of the 23rd Paralell..."
     
Jun 16, 2013 04:43 |  #64

What I don't get is that they don't like the chemistry between you and them...but they still want you to shoot their Bridal Shower.
Something suss is going on.


Regards, Phil
2019 South Australian Country Press Assoc Sports Photo of the Year - Runner Up
2018 South Australian Country Press Assoc Sports Photo of the Year
2018 CAMS (now Motorsport Australia) Gold Accredited Photographer
Finallist - 2014 NT Media Awards
"A bad day at the race track is better than a good day in the office"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,635 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2057
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
Jun 16, 2013 06:14 |  #65

philwillmedia wrote in post #16035375 (external link)
What I don't get is that they don't like the chemistry between you and them...but they still want you to shoot their Bridal Shower.
Something suss is going on.

Does anyone actually believe that "chemistry" has anything to do with this?
The engagement shoot didn't go according to plan and as a result the B&G didn't get either the number or quality of images they were expecting. As a result they are nervous and want the OP to shoot the shower as a way of finding out for sure if they can produce images of the quality shown in the OPs portfolio.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eiro
Goldmember
1,368 posts
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2009
Location: U.S.
     
Jun 16, 2013 06:27 |  #66

The found a way to get some freebies out of you, and hoping it will work. Stick to your contract. Let them know if there is "no chemistr"y then that means you're not the right fit and it's pointless to continue to do any-type of further work with them. If they only gave you a certain percentage towards the overall total payment, subtract the value of the time you've input with the conditions you had to work with to which they agreed instead of rescheduling that day, and give them back the difference only after they will sign some kind of documentation that they will not slander your name based upon termination of contract, where you amicably part ways.Have your lawyer come up with one if you don't already have one. If it smells like poop chances are it's poop. Best is to stay away from crappy clients like that. You don't need the high blood pressure nor the stress or feeling drained and discouraged after dealing with them.


Get out and shoot

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DamianOz
Senior Member
696 posts
Joined Jul 2011
     
Jun 16, 2013 06:48 |  #67

To me, the deposit is not worth the hassle, its already consuming your time and attention.
I would just give back the deposit, and move on. Let them keep what they have and advise your services are no long available to them.

To me business is about making people happy, happy people pay. If you can't make them happy, move on but leave the best impression you can. Bad word of mouth is not worth any deposit


Bodies - Canon EOS 5DIII | EOS 6D
Primes - TS-E24 f/3.5L II | Σ 35mm F1.4 DG Art | EF 85 f/1.2L II | EF 135 f/2L
Zooms - EF 16-35 f/2.8L II | EF 24-70 f/2.8L II | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | Σ 24-105mm F/4 DG OS Art | Σ 120-300mm F/2.8 DG OS Sport

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tickerguy
Senior Member
595 posts
Joined Dec 2012
     
Jun 16, 2013 12:03 |  #68

IMHO return the "Deposit" less deduction for time spent (and document the hours) at the billing rate and depart as your contract allows. You have a conflict either between you that is honest in style and expectations (and thus hard to overcome) or worse, they are dishonest and trying to obtain services for which they are not paying and do not intend to pay. There is no way for you to know which is the case with certainty. The first is bad but possibly salvageable, the second will become a nightmare if you continue. There is no reason for you to continue once your original premise, that both parties are dealing in good faith and like each other at a professional level, has been materially damaged. You negotiated a price on that premise and it's no longer valid.

Next, change your contract to specify that you are collecting a "Non-refundable booking fee" rather than a "Deposit." Explain in the agreement that the fee is for the privilege of retaining the date and is fully-earned at signing. Specify appropriate and reasonable constraints on changes in the date, time and/or venue once the commitment is taken and booking fee is paid. In a case such as this the latter is important because apparently part of the problem was either arrangements with one of the venues and/or weather conditions; one is under your control if you know about it in advance but the other is not, but your fee must (and should) include the first while the risk of the second and its impact on results must lay with the client, since they are the ones choosing both the venue and date/time.

If you are not already doing so change your fee schedule so that you collect for each component of your work as-performed. If your booking fee is particularly substantial then allow it to be applied to the LAST payment for service (only!) in whole or part as you deem appropriate. Had you put this in place up front there would have been a strong disincentive for someone to try to obtain services without paying for them. This is important for the future as the first and best defense against a client pulling something like this is for the contract to make such behavior unprofitable -- and thus you'll never sign such a client in the first place.

Do not (ever) allow a payment against your schedule to slip or be made in a non-agreed manner. This is particularly true if you specify good, cleared funds (and you damn well should) because people DO write rubber checks and while you might eventually get the funds the collection costs both personally and financially are ridiculous.


Canon 7D & 5d3, EF-S 15-85, 24-105L, 70-200L f/4 IS, 100mm Macro/L, EF 50 f/1.4 and more

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
overclock
Goldmember
1,191 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
     
Jun 19, 2013 11:59 |  #69

This ought to be a warning sign for the groom. I feel bad for you OP but I feel worse for him.

Refund their money with an agreement that you get to photograph the divorce!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike1812
Senior Member
338 posts
Likes: 63
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Houston, TX
     
Jun 19, 2013 17:03 |  #70

overclock wrote in post #16045450 (external link)
This ought to be a warning sign for the groom. I feel bad for you OP but I feel worse for him.

Refund their money with an agreement that you get to photograph the divorce!

I was thinking this throughout my entire reading of this thread! In fact, I'm wondering if part of the initial consultation should include the photographer asking, "Have either of you been diagnosed as schizophrenic, manic-depressive, or bi-polar?". LOL.


EF 135L | EF 70-300 L | ST-E3-RT | (4) Einstein E640s | Sekonic L-758 | Sony A7RII Gripped | Sony A7RIII Gripped | Sony 16-35GM | Sony FE 55 f/1.8 | Sony FE 85 f/1.4 GM | Sony FE 100-400GM | Sony 1.4x | Sony HVL-60M | Sigma MC-11 | Flashpoint Xplor AD600 | Flashpoint AD200 (2)| Flashpoint AD360 | plus too many doodads to list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stillinamerica
Goldmember
1,275 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Alabama
     
Jun 20, 2013 00:08 |  #71

This is a good read and good thread. OP, I like your openness to the responses.

Here is my take, I have been in a similar situation but worked out well.

1) the client is being reasonable. You also have two people on the end of the email, the bride and groom (groom normally remains hidden but you can bet they wrote the message together).

2) the reason for the request of the bridal shoot is simple. They are not 'digging'. If we understand they are being reasonable, they clearly understand that you may not give them their money back, so Instead they are asking of something that may be of value.

3) I am concerned that you have already spent their money. That's why there is a problem returning it. Always keep a fund of cash in the bank for emergencies like this.

4) I had to fight tooth and nail not to shoot a bridal session yesterday with parents of the bride as it was horid weather. They eventually gave in, based on the need to 'trust me as their photographer'.you should have postponed.

5) 13 images. Ridiculous. Especially given the time it took to present them with 13 images. I would be livid.

6) you failed in what you had planned, it was your fault not there's. give them all their money back and walk away. Run away from them. Don't keep their money u less you really think you earned it.

I like your work on your website.

7) learn and move on.


[CENTER]My Facebook (external link) (please like me) My Website (external link)[/
Canon Gear: 5D Mark3, 16-35L 24-70L, 70-200 2.8L, 50L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pureadrenalin
Member
116 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Oct 2007
     
Jun 21, 2013 14:55 |  #72

Don't worry about bad reviews. If they are threatening, they will likely leave them anyway.

Secondly, let your work speak for you. Some like it, some don't. I took a quick peek at your blog, and it's quite clear you have a younger, edgier feel. Perhaps they were after something a bit more romantic, warm and soft... Regardless. She sounds like a complete bridezilla who won't be happy with anything...probably ever...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

12,335 views & 0 likes for this thread, 30 members have posted to it.
Bride Cancels Wedding, Wants Depsoit Back
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1283 guests, 121 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.