Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 16 Jun 2013 (Sunday) 19:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Mountain Top Panoramas -- Mt. Kinsman, NH

 
Coppatop85
Goldmember
Avatar
1,928 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 49
Joined May 2007
     
Jun 16, 2013 19:37 |  #1

My reward from a 10 mile hike yesterday:

1. 3 image panorama. f/9 @ 17 mm, 1/50, ISO 200

IMAGE: http://www.coppatopphotos.com/img/s9/v92/p1734582979-4.jpg

View 1 mile from the summit of Mt. Kinsman. The mountains in the photo are Mt. Lincoln, and Mt. Lafayette. If anyone is interested, here is a link (LARGE FILE) to an 18 image 360 degree panorama taken from the actual summit:


2. f/11 @ 27 mm, 1/60, ISO 200
http://www.coppatoppho​tos.com/img/s10/v101/p​1741747494.jpg (external link)


Here's the same photo ULTRA compressed to all hell for forums:
IMAGE: http://www.coppatopphotos.com/img/s10/v101/p1741747494-4.jpg


This was my first truly successful 360 degree panorama from a mountain. Previously I had got them to span about 280 - 300 degrees, but this one is the full 360 and came out great. I had another panorama from the top which I did not include -- I don't think I leveled my tripod correctly, and the horizon was warped and misaligned when I stitched the images together.


All images taken with 5D mk3, Canon 17-40L with a CPL attached. C+C welcome!

5D3, lenses, tripod, and a flash.
Wobsite: www.coppatopphotos.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tarheeldragon
Senior Member
Avatar
622 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Aug 2010
Location: North Carolina
     
Jun 16, 2013 20:34 |  #2

GREAT shot! :)


Heros don't wear capes, they wear dog-tags!
Canon 60D, Canon 18-135 EFS, 10-22 EFS, 55-250 EFS and EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L Lenses, Kenko 2.0X PRO 300 Teleconverter DGX.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clippo
Senior Member
394 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Cheshire, UK
     
Jun 17, 2013 09:10 as a reply to  @ tarheeldragon's post |  #3

pretty good - just had a quick look at the high res of the 360 - can see quite a few dust spots on it plus some unevenness in the blending of the sky - that's likely from use of the CPL. Also, the foregound looks a little oof and there's some haloing around distant hills.

Still good though.. I've done quite a few of these myself here in the UK (had a series of them published over several months in a major mag actually). Are you using a pano head?

If you use that body/lens combo at around 19mm you should be able to get a full 360 with about 8 individual frames (portrait of course).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Coppatop85
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,928 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 49
Joined May 2007
     
Jun 17, 2013 10:12 |  #4

clippo wrote in post #16038434 (external link)
pretty good - just had a quick look at the high res of the 360 - can see quite a few dust spots on it plus some unevenness in the blending of the sky - that's likely from use of the CPL. Also, the foregound looks a little oof and there's some haloing around distant hills.

Still good though.. I've done quite a few of these myself here in the UK (had a series of them published over several months in a major mag actually). Are you using a pano head?

If you use that body/lens combo at around 19mm you should be able to get a full 360 with about 8 individual frames (portrait of course).


Thanks for the tips! I did notice the foreground was a bit OFF as well. I use a ball head, not a panoramic head. It's easy enough to take panos though, just hard to get the level right.

I tend to use a lot more photos because I like more overlap. Gives me more freedom to subtract things and blend things into the image. There were a few people at the summit moving around and walking, but i was able to easily get rid of them because of the amount of overlap I had.


5D3, lenses, tripod, and a flash.
Wobsite: www.coppatopphotos.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clippo
Senior Member
394 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Cheshire, UK
     
Jun 17, 2013 12:51 as a reply to  @ Coppatop85's post |  #5

using a ball head probably accounts for the blurry foreground. Basically you are getting parallax errors from this and they show up most in the foreground.

Using a panohead gets around this as it rotates the lens around its nodal point when set-up correctly. You don't get parallax errors even up close. I use a panosaurus which is very inexpensive and light weight... (about on the limit for supporting a 5D plus lens actually!)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Coppatop85
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,928 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 49
Joined May 2007
     
Jun 17, 2013 13:30 |  #6

I labeled the mountains if anyone is curious and from the area.

IMAGE: http://www.coppatopphotos.com/img/s10/v101/p1719434255-4.jpg


Also, sheesh! Panoramic heads are expensive. I have a RRS ball-head, their pano heads are $650+

5D3, lenses, tripod, and a flash.
Wobsite: www.coppatopphotos.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,828 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Mountain Top Panoramas -- Mt. Kinsman, NH
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1381 guests, 179 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.