I'm thinking I'm close to grabbing the Sigma 30 but not sure which one would be the better option.
Looking for advice. Thank you.
daystar Senior Member 589 posts Likes: 520 Joined Aug 2008 Location: East Coast, US More info | Jul 01, 2013 09:48 | #1 I'm thinking I'm close to grabbing the Sigma 30 but not sure which one would be the better option. Nikon D750 | Nikon D7100 | 85mm 1.8G | 50mm 1.8G | 35mm 1.8G | Tamron 70-200 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Jul 01, 2013 09:54 | #2 The Art version is the "new and improved" version and is a bit sharper with better MFD and focus. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 01, 2013 18:03 | #3 The art, no question. It is better optically (a bit), build-wise, and is compatible with the USB dock. -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vertigo235 Goldmember More info | Jul 01, 2013 19:27 | #4 Art
LOG IN TO REPLY |
daystar THREAD STARTER Senior Member 589 posts Likes: 520 Joined Aug 2008 Location: East Coast, US More info | Jul 01, 2013 23:36 | #5 Thanks everyone! Nikon D750 | Nikon D7100 | 85mm 1.8G | 50mm 1.8G | 35mm 1.8G | Tamron 70-200 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jrbdmb Goldmember 1,291 posts Likes: 12 Joined May 2011 More info | Jul 02, 2013 05:19 | #6 For a while the old EX version was being blown out at about half the normal selling price, making this a more interesting question. The old version was still pretty good in the center, not so much in the corners. Tools: 70D, 10-22, Tamron 24-70 VC, 70-300L, 135 f2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
watt100 Cream of the Crop 14,021 posts Likes: 34 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Jul 02, 2013 17:59 | #7 jrbdmb wrote in post #16083223 For a while the old EX version was being blown out at about half the normal selling price, making this a more interesting question. The old version was still pretty good in the center, not so much in the corners. yes, the "old" Sigma 30 1.4 version is still pretty good, just look thru the lens archive section. A downright steal at $250 - $300
LOG IN TO REPLY |
memo90061 Member 167 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2011 More info | Sep 03, 2013 16:16 | #8 I'm in a dilemma. I don't know if I should buy the old one used for 295 or the new one on eBay for 376 from Hong Kong. Would there be any import duties? Is the new Sigma 30mm worth it? I'm leaning towards the newer version just because of the dock, but it wouldn't leave me money for another lens I wanted.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gall551 Member 59 posts Joined Nov 2008 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Sep 03, 2013 17:43 | #9 memo90061 wrote in post #16265103 I'm in a dilemma. I don't know if I should buy the old one used for 295 or the new one on eBay for 376 from Hong Kong. Would there be any import duties? Is the new Sigma 30mm worth it? I'm leaning towards the newer version just because of the dock, but it wouldn't leave me money for another lens I wanted. I have the old one, and it's sharp as I would never need! Canon 60D : Sigma 18-35 1.8 : 55-250mm IS : 430ex II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sonofjesse Senior Member 692 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2006 More info | Sep 03, 2013 18:03 | #10 Get the new one!! Better resale and better lens IMHO. FeedBack
LOG IN TO REPLY |
memo90061 Member 167 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2011 More info | Sep 03, 2013 18:14 | #11 Hmmm. Thanks. It's from an eBay seller in Hong Kong. It wouldn't have the US warranty. That's why I'm thinknig about it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 03, 2013 19:17 | #12 sonofjesse wrote in post #16265365 Get the new one!! Better resale and better lens IMHO. Seeing that you would have too buy the EX used, the resale value as a percentage is much higher that route. Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
memo90061 Member 167 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2011 More info | Sep 03, 2013 23:00 | #13 I probably won't have a chance to test the lens if I buy it used online.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davomate Member 114 posts Joined May 2011 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | I had the original and now I have the Art. The latter's focus seems more consistently accurate (at thin depths of field). I often had to retake shots with the original to get accurate focus. The Art seems more consistently accurate to me. Canon 7D / 10-22 / 17-55 / 70-200 f2.8L IS II / 100-400L / 100L Macro / Σ 30 f1.4 A / Σ 85 f1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
memo90061 Member 167 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2011 More info | Sep 03, 2013 23:51 | #15 Thank you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 523 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||