No chance of it being junk...its will certainly give the 7D a run for its money
LoneRider Goldmember 1,349 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: Mount Isa, North West Qld More info | No chance of it being junk...its will certainly give the 7D a run for its money Trevor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ranger187 Senior Member 486 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2004 Location: NV / PA More info | Aug 03, 2013 20:18 | #1172 Lone Rider wrote in post #16178567 Zim lost it in another thread...https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=16159110#post16159110 I think he was trying to say it was better off holding off to 2014 as there was a much better camera coming out. (amongst other stuff) Like many others you can easily fall into the trap of the ‘waiting game’ hoping soon after a new model is released they'll come down in price, but then rumors start circulating on another new model and so they wait and the frustration builds. The 70D is going to be Canons flagship prosumer for a long time so theres no point getting hung up on newer models. If its suits the purpose and you like it...simply get one... ![]() The trolling on that tread I just saw.... I wish I saw it sooner.... Sad as it is truth, trolling and posts like that are what make me smile. Lone Rider wrote in post #16178761 No chance of it being junk...its will certainly give the 7D a run for its money Posts like this make me feel warm and fuzzy inside knowing I bought it. BLOG
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kcbrown Cream of the Crop 5,384 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2007 Location: Silicon Valley More info | Aug 03, 2013 20:53 | #1173 Ranger187 wrote in post #16178986 Posts like this make me feel warm and fuzzy inside knowing I bought it. It was a good choice if you have more need for the 70D's articulating screen and the live view autofocus capability than the 7D's extra autofocus modes (spot and expanded point) and speed. "There are some things that money can't buy, but they aren't Ls and aren't worth having" -- Shooter-boy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 04, 2013 03:51 | #1175 kcbrown wrote in post #16179020 It was a good choice if you have more need for the 70D's articulating screen and the live view autofocus capability than the 7D's extra autofocus modes (spot and expanded point) and speed. If in terms of your specific use, the 70D and 7D are essentially equivalent, then you'd probably be better off with a 7D since you can acquire one for less than a 70D and put the difference into glass. Regardless, that's just the 70D compared with the 7D. In "absolute" terms, I think your 70D will prove to be a real winner of a camera, and you'll find that there is really nothing photographically that you can't do with it. Same with the 7D. Modern cameras are so incredibly capable that the choice of camera body no longer matters all that much unless your needs are extremely demanding. The images you can capture with any of them and some decent glass are just astounding. We are very spoiled these days. ![]() For some reason I can't stop thinking that Canon will add those 2 extra modes to the 70D via a firmware update once the 7D2 is out. I'm just guessing they left them out so the 7D sales would not suffer too much. 550D | EF-S 18-55mm F/3.5-5.6 IS | EF 50mm F/1.8 II | EF 70-200mm F/4L IS | Speedlite 580EX II | LumoPro LP180 | Gitzo GT3541XLS | Arca-Swiss Monoball Z1 SP | ONA Bowery (black, non-leather)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Stone13 Goldmember 1,690 posts Likes: 8 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Huntersville, NC More info | Aug 04, 2013 10:22 | #1176 Imaging Resource has posted 70D raw files from ISO 100 up to ISO 25600: Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,734 posts Likes: 4067 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Aug 04, 2013 10:58 | #1177 Stone 13 wrote in post #16180087 Imaging Resource has posted 70D raw files from ISO 100 up to ISO 25600: http://www.imaging-resource.com …canon-70d/canon-70dA7.HTM Hmmm.. Just took a quick peek at the ISO6400 samples and compared to the 7D ISO6400 and it's not looking good for the 70D. They look significantly more noisy. Time to find some better 7D raw samples hopefully the same image. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Stone13 Goldmember 1,690 posts Likes: 8 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Huntersville, NC More info | Aug 04, 2013 11:07 | #1178 gjl711 wrote in post #16180172 Hmmm.. Just took a quick peek at the ISO6400 samples and compared to the 7D ISO6400 and it's not looking good for the 70D. They look significantly more noisy. Time to find some better 7D raw samples hopefully the same image. to be honest, I had a similar impression. I used LR 5.2 and I know support for the 70D is listed as "preliminary" so maybe Adobe has some more work to do. Comparing apples to oranges, the ISO 6400 shots look to be 1/2 stop worse than my 7D. Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,734 posts Likes: 4067 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Aug 04, 2013 11:37 | #1179 I used arc and had everything set to defaults. It does look as if it has a less aggressive AA though. The image is a tad sharper. Noisier but also sharper. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Stone13 Goldmember 1,690 posts Likes: 8 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Huntersville, NC More info | Aug 04, 2013 11:48 | #1180 I agree, the 70D raw files has a bit more detail. I found DPP 3.13.20 on the Canon Europe site and the conversion is a bit better, any valid EOS serial# should work to get the download: Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mojodawg Member 91 posts Joined Jul 2013 More info | Aug 04, 2013 22:14 | #1181 gjl711 wrote in post #16180172 Hmmm.. Just took a quick peek at the ISO6400 samples and compared to the 7D ISO6400 and it's not looking good for the 70D. They look significantly more noisy. Time to find some better 7D raw samples hopefully the same image. I don't see the raw files to compare, but the comparison of jpg at 6400 looks much better than the 7D. Looks better than the Nikon D7100 all the way up to 25,600. 70D | 10-22mm ƒ/3.5-4.5 | 17-55mm ƒ/2.8 | 50mm ƒ/1.4 | 70-300mm ƒ/4-5.6 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Keema Member 247 posts Likes: 4 Joined Feb 2012 More info | Aug 05, 2013 00:13 | #1182 hmmm...i've just seen the raw files from 70D from the site above, and did a comparison on their database from a 7D @ ISO 6400, and viewing on 100% at the "mug" picture part, In my opinion, the 70D has lesser noise compared to 7D, just a little though. And It is a bit sharper and has a little detail on it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras More info | Having read all that I can on the 70D and knowing life is a gamble flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 05, 2013 05:36 | #1184 MedicineMan4040 wrote in post #16182223 Having read all that I can on the 70D and knowing life is a gamble I'm pre-ordering today.In the Canon world I'm a 6D user and specify that camera for astro work....my other love is macro and that has the 70D's name written all over it. Hmmmm, I must be particularly stupid this morning so you'll have to explain. Just what features of the 70D seem so well suited to macro work? Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 05, 2013 05:44 | #1185 Id say swivel screen helps macro work flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1492 guests, 114 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||