Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 03 Jul 2013 (Wednesday) 12:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

My most recent attempt. (and help?)

 
Dan ­ Kearley
Senior Member
426 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Aug 2012
     
Jul 03, 2013 12:54 |  #1

I spent a few days in the BC/Okanagan region... here are the best couple shots.

I also took 5 shots hoping to stack them, but Registax just keeps crashing on me. (and I don't know what I'm doing anyways)
I wonder if someone wouldn't mind doing the stacking bit for me and seeing how it turns out? (I can link to the photos here)

1

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Byte size: ZERO

2
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Byte size: ZERO

3
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Byte size: ZERO



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
morisan
Member
40 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2013
Location: St. Louis
     
Jul 03, 2013 13:16 |  #2

The shot of the northern lights is great, where did you take it from?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Kearley
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
426 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Aug 2012
     
Jul 03, 2013 13:30 |  #3

Thanks! This was in south-central BC. 'Osoyoos'
I grew up in northern BC and I've never seen anything like that.

Now that I look at these closer, I don't think I had them focused. I remember struggling with this in the dark.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gutterscum
Goldmember
1,036 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 11
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Victoria, Australia
     
Jul 03, 2013 16:44 |  #4

Last one especially looks OOF.

Did you change to manual? And focus is crucial!!


Canon 60D gripped,70-200 2.8 IS, Tokina 11-16 f2.8, Tamron 15-55 2.8 non VG

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Kearley
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
426 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Aug 2012
     
Jul 03, 2013 16:46 |  #5

What a missed opportunity! I think I assumed autofocus wouldn't work in that light. Should it normally work?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thanboora
Member
188 posts
Joined Jun 2013
     
Jul 03, 2013 16:57 |  #6

I think autofocus doesn't work usually, and you prolly should manually focus them. I agree that especially the last photo seems to be out of focus a bit. Basically when you focus star, manually focus them nearly at the infinity. Some people uses live view 10x to focus stars. Others including myself, I do several trials of shooting, then see zoomed image if stars have been focused. If you see star is out of focus adjust a bit of your focus ring till you see focused star which looks much clear pinpoint rather than lighter and bigger radius in shape. What I mentioned may not be the best way but I have learned it from other people as well, and it works fine for me.
thanks for reading,


| SGK | Canon EOS 60D | Sigma 10-20mm |
Gene Kim Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Kearley
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
426 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Aug 2012
     
Jul 03, 2013 17:00 |  #7

I guess my related question... I assumed infinity focus was as far out as the lens could focus.. but I usually have a bit PAST this where even the furthest objects aren't focused.. I would need to pull the focus a little closer than this. (is this clear?) Is infinite focus not quite focused all the way out?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gutterscum
Goldmember
1,036 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 11
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Victoria, Australia
     
Jul 03, 2013 17:02 |  #8

Find a bright star, go manual and focus on it - live view really helps. Zoom in as much as possible on the star and focus on it. This should set the infinity minus one poopteenth range. Zoom back out and try then.

I am a total novice on this stuff myself and not professing to be an expert, just what I have picked up, I am trying to pass on.


Canon 60D gripped,70-200 2.8 IS, Tokina 11-16 f2.8, Tamron 15-55 2.8 non VG

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thanboora
Member
188 posts
Joined Jun 2013
     
Jul 03, 2013 17:10 as a reply to  @ Dan Kearley's post |  #9

so there are two rings on lens. bigger one which is closer to the camera body, that's the zoom in/out ring. There is another ring near the outer most, this is focus ring and this will be the one that you will be adjusting when you focus stars manually. See the image below, this should do better than my text lol
Thanks for reading,


| SGK | Canon EOS 60D | Sigma 10-20mm |
Gene Kim Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Kearley
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
426 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Aug 2012
     
Jul 03, 2013 17:12 |  #10

Sorry... I know what the focus ring is. What I was asking was that I figured infinite focus was all the way 'out'.. but on all my lenses, this puts even the most distant objects out of focus.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thanboora
Member
188 posts
Joined Jun 2013
     
Jul 03, 2013 17:13 |  #11

sorry, had issues attaching the image, but take a peek at this website.
http://asia.cnet.com …and-exposure-62201920.htm (external link)


| SGK | Canon EOS 60D | Sigma 10-20mm |
Gene Kim Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thanboora
Member
188 posts
Joined Jun 2013
     
Jul 03, 2013 17:14 |  #12

Oops I apologize. I must have misread something from the one of your postings..


| SGK | Canon EOS 60D | Sigma 10-20mm |
Gene Kim Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thanboora
Member
188 posts
Joined Jun 2013
     
Jul 03, 2013 17:22 |  #13

first, it may work better at near the infinity but not exactly all the way out, according to other people. And that's why most of the people likes to use 10X live view when they focus. I haven't had such issues, but I saw some other people using blending two images, one focused on starts, and another that is foucsed on your foreground. I may not be writing the perfect information, but hope it helps a little.
Thanks for reading,


| SGK | Canon EOS 60D | Sigma 10-20mm |
Gene Kim Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,877 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
My most recent attempt. (and help?)
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1352 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.