Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 04 Jul 2013 (Thursday) 00:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Need advice, first outing with new Canon 70-300 L

 
timd35
Member
Avatar
224 posts
Gallery: 57 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 467
Joined Dec 2012
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Jul 04, 2013 00:08 |  #1

Hi All,

Just picked up a new Canon 70-300 L. It was a challenging day for pictures with very bright sunlight at around 5:00 PM. My first outing with it and I have mixed feelings about the results. More than likely me but I thought I would post a couple examples and get some feedback. Not sure if I am expecting too much in the sharpness area with the conditions I was shooting in.

The first one here has no sharpening applied. Just exported it from LR4.4 from RAW to JPEG at 3600 on the long side. I was having difficulty determining where it focused when looking at it 100%.

The next three had a little bit of sharpening and some small raw adjustments for shadows and slight exposure adjustment but nothing really harsh.

This one was cropped just a little bit.

All taken with 5DM3. Appreciate any input.

Images were removed


'Imagination is more important than knowledge.'
—Albert Einstein
http://timdahlphotogra​phy.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kin2son
Goldmember
4,546 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Jul 04, 2013 01:16 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

All look fine to me.


5D3 Gripped / 17-40L / Σ35 / 40 Pancake / Zeiss 50 MP / Σ85 / 100L Macro / 70-200 f2.8L II IS / 430 EX II / 580 EX II / Canon 2xIII TC / Kenko Ext. Tubes
EOS M / EF-M 18-55 / EF-M 22f2 / Ricoh GR aka Ultimate street camera :p
Flickr (external link) | My Images on Getty®‎ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Jul 04, 2013 01:54 |  #3

honestly...i'd recommend taking the camera out of auto mode...if only to choose your AF points at least...if you're shooting something static, choose one shot focusing...if it's moving like above, choose AI servo...

I'd recommend starting in AV mode, and just adjusting the ISO to make sure you can get a fast enough shutter speed...


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timd35
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
224 posts
Gallery: 57 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 467
Joined Dec 2012
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Jul 04, 2013 10:33 |  #4

DreDaze wrote in post #16089758 (external link)
honestly...i'd recommend taking the camera out of auto mode...if only to choose your AF points at least...if you're shooting something static, choose one shot focusing...if it's moving like above, choose AI servo...

I'd recommend starting in AV mode, and just adjusting the ISO to make sure you can get a fast enough shutter speed...

I wasn't in auto mode (or at least not the green square) :) . I was using auto exposure and ISO 400. I was using a custom function in the first image which was using AI Servo in single-point AF mode with center point selected. I did change to Av mode after a bit. Two of the images are with AE and two are after I changed to Av Mode.


'Imagination is more important than knowledge.'
—Albert Einstein
http://timdahlphotogra​phy.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Jul 04, 2013 10:53 |  #5

sorry, i must've read the exif wrong last night...:)


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keyan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,319 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 78
Joined Mar 2011
     
Jul 04, 2013 11:39 as a reply to  @ DreDaze's post |  #6

I guess I don't see what the problem is?


Cameras: 7D2, S100
Lenses: 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM, 18-135 STM, 24-70 f/4L IS USM, 50 f/1.4 USM,70-300L IS USM
Other Stuff: 430 EX II, Luma Labs Loop 3, CamRanger

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jul 04, 2013 11:54 |  #7

[QUOTE=Keyan;16090861]I guess I don't see what the problem is?[/quote]

or the question.


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timd35
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
224 posts
Gallery: 57 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 467
Joined Dec 2012
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Jul 04, 2013 12:24 as a reply to  @ ed rader's post |  #8

No real question but was requesting feedback on the images. I was not happy with a lot of them. Take the first picture for example. If you look at the large image on my flickr site it seems to be out of focus. It was taken 1/800, f/10, with mode 1 IS on. The helicopter was moving very slowing. I have a lot of images that are not very sharp such as this one. Maybe I need to work with the lens more.

I was just looking for feedback on what I thought was oof pics since I had a lot of them. I took some simple stationary pics as well that just did not seem sharp.


'Imagination is more important than knowledge.'
—Albert Einstein
http://timdahlphotogra​phy.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christina.DazzleByDesign
Goldmember
Avatar
1,973 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Mar 2012
     
Jul 04, 2013 17:42 |  #9

Well, the lighting is really flat and dull, the colours of the heli are dull to begin with. So I can see why it might lead the image to look flat. The first image doesn't look out of focus completely but I think I can see what you mean. It looks ever so slightly like motion blur, but not much. You had IS mode set to 1 instead of 2 right? Maybe try shooting without IS if your SS is fast enough.

The close up of the two inside the heli looks nice and sharp to me. For the first image, why were you at f/10? Just seems an odd f/stop to choose and not really necessary for the subject matter. Most lenses have sweet spots for their aperture - maybe try opening up a bit. This lens is extremely sharp wide open.


5D3 | 7D | 85L II | 70-300L | 24-105L | Nifty Fifty | 600EX-RT_______________
| Facebook (external link) | Website (external link) | Gear List |Flickr (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidfarina
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1028
Joined May 2013
     
Jul 04, 2013 18:00 |  #10

Honestly, your pictures look great. About the sharpness i cant tell much since they are resized, but the resized images you posted look like a successful shooting.

Dont worry to much i think you got a great lens


Sony A7RII | Sony A7S
EF 40 | EF 70-300L | FD 35 Tilt-Shift
FE 16-35 | FE 28 | FE 90
CV 15 4.5 III | CV 40 1.4 MC | Summilux 50 ASPH
Website (external link) | 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
archer1960
Goldmember
Avatar
4,932 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 82
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jul 04, 2013 18:10 |  #11

The writing on the side of the 'copter in #1 looks plenty sharp for an internet-sized image. Where did you have the focus point? Maybe it's just front- or back-focusing a bit.


Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timd35
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
224 posts
Gallery: 57 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 467
Joined Dec 2012
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Jul 04, 2013 21:31 |  #12

archer1960 wrote in post #16091820 (external link)
The writing on the side of the 'copter in #1 looks plenty sharp for an internet-sized image. Where did you have the focus point? Maybe it's just front- or back-focusing a bit.

I was trying to keep the focus point right on him as he was slowly moving away. I was going to do some more pictures in the next couple of days. If I am still not happy with results the next couple of times I am out with it I might try MFA with the Dot-Tune method and see what it tells me. I have never had to MFA any of my lenses but I did have to send a Canon 70-200 2.8 mk 1 back to canon due to back focus before they had MFA.


'Imagination is more important than knowledge.'
—Albert Einstein
http://timdahlphotogra​phy.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timd35
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
224 posts
Gallery: 57 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 467
Joined Dec 2012
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Jul 04, 2013 21:34 |  #13

davidfarina wrote in post #16091784 (external link)
Honestly, your pictures look great. About the sharpness i cant tell much since they are resized, but the resized images you posted look like a successful shooting.

Dont worry to much i think you got a great lens

Thanks and appreciate your input. I will keep shooting and see how it goes. I really like the lens. I plan on taking it for a week of backpacking in 3 weeks and can't wait. :)


'Imagination is more important than knowledge.'
—Albert Einstein
http://timdahlphotogra​phy.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timd35
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
224 posts
Gallery: 57 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 467
Joined Dec 2012
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Jul 04, 2013 21:49 |  #14

Christina.DazzleByDesi​gn wrote in post #16091749 (external link)
Well, the lighting is really flat and dull, the colours of the heli are dull to begin with. So I can see why it might lead the image to look flat. The first image doesn't look out of focus completely but I think I can see what you mean. It looks ever so slightly like motion blur, but not much. You had IS mode set to 1 instead of 2 right? Maybe try shooting without IS if your SS is fast enough.

The close up of the two inside the heli looks nice and sharp to me. For the first image, why were you at f/10? Just seems an odd f/stop to choose and not really necessary for the subject matter. Most lenses have sweet spots for their aperture - maybe try opening up a bit. This lens is extremely sharp wide open.

Yeah, the sun was really bright and it was at 5 so a really flat time to be shooting. I was in AE mode and did not pay attention to the aperture setting. I later changed to Av Mode and opened it up a bit. I was in Mode 1 for the IS and will continue to experiment with IS. Thinking about it though I might should have been in mode 2 since I was panning along with the helicopter.


'Imagination is more important than knowledge.'
—Albert Einstein
http://timdahlphotogra​phy.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rolex
Member
120 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Liverpool
     
Jul 05, 2013 02:49 |  #15

your pictures dont look too bad! ...the subject is a little boring tho!
maybe try the lens out on a more colourful and apealing subject that way the shots might "pop" out more and give you more of an idea what the lens is capable of.

just my opinion




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,235 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Need advice, first outing with new Canon 70-300 L
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1011 guests, 108 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.