Possible to develop a manual flash with a built in transceiver? ie, you will not need to have a trigger on camera to trigger the flash by letting the built in transceiver do the work?
abuha Member 215 posts Joined Oct 2010 More info | Jul 16, 2013 08:22 | #1 Possible to develop a manual flash with a built in transceiver? ie, you will not need to have a trigger on camera to trigger the flash by letting the built in transceiver do the work?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 16, 2013 08:59 | #3 I mean using a single unit off camera without the need of on camera trigger by having the trigger incorporated in the unit. It is my understanding that you still need a trigger to set off the 600ex rt off camera as on its own.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop 26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | Jul 16, 2013 09:16 | #4 abuha wrote in post #16124724 Possible to develop a manual flash with a built in transceiver? ie, you will not need to have a trigger on camera to trigger the flash by letting the built in transceiver do the work? How will the flash know to trigger at the appropriate time if you do not have a transmitter on the camera to send that signal to the flash? ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jcolman Goldmember More info | Jul 16, 2013 10:21 | #5 abuha wrote in post #16124816 I mean using a single unit off camera without the need of on camera trigger by having the trigger incorporated in the unit. It is my understanding that you still need a trigger to set off the 600ex rt off camera as on its own. well, I am sure I am asking for too much. Lets assume that a camera had a built in transmitter. You still need a way to control the output of the flash. Do you go into a menu on the camera? A dial on the top? What is the advantage? The transmitter for the Cheetah lights is small, compact and has all the functionality you need right on the transmitter. I really don't see the need for a camera manufacturer to incorporate this feature into a body. Besides, if they did, it would be for their light system and not another manufacturers lights, thereby limiting the user to one system.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlashZebra This space available 4,427 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: Northern Kentucky More info | Jul 16, 2013 11:42 | #6 PacAce wrote in post #16124854 How will the flash know to trigger at the appropriate time if you do not have a transmitter on the camera to send that signal to the flash? We still have a ways to go before mind reading devices become a reality. ![]() PacAce,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Whortleberry Goldmember 1,719 posts Likes: 53 Joined Dec 2011 Location: Yorkshire, England More info | Jul 16, 2013 11:49 | #7 FlashZebra wrote in post #16125278 I prefer to call this device by the correct technical terminology, the "clairvoyant camera". The "clairvoyant camera" would also be adept at fixing all sorts of other messy and confounding hardware issues. Mind over matter technology in cameras is just emerging but is likely to have at least 75% of the market by 2016 . Enjoy! Lon This in addition, of course, to going out all on it's own and finding masterpieces to photograph without any owner input whatsoever. Industry rumours are starting to emerge that there may be an interesting launch on 30th February next year. Phil ǁ Kershaw Soho Reflex: 4¼" Ross Xpres, 6½" Aldis, Super XX/ABC Pyro in 24 DDS, HP3/Meritol Metol in RFH, Johnson 'Scales' brand flash powder. Kodak Duo Six-20/Verichrome Pan. Other odd bits over the decades, simply to get the job done - not merely to polish and brag about cos I'm too mean to buy the polish!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is EBiffany 1599 guests, 97 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||