h14nha wrote in post #16136711
Whilst I get the remote shooting can be a bonus, people go FF as they see it as an upgrade to APSC. Why would you then want to shoot JPEG ? ? ? Why would you want to show a client an un-edited picture, and why upload un-edited pictures to the Internet ( unless their for private viewing Facebook/Flickr )
The OP asked essentially the exact same question in another thread, and I responded with the following with respect to wifi, but it applies to jpeg as well:
Tom, not everyone shoots the way you do, and having wifi means more than just sharing quick shots on Facebook. You have to think more broadly about the potential uses.
What about professional sports shooters, for example? They can take a shot of a wide receiver catching a touchdown pass in the end zone. If his camera is set to record JPGs with some light editing done by the camera via Picture Styles, and I believe the 6D lets you do in-camera cropping. From there, the photographer can send those photos to his phone via the camera's wifi, then email them to the publisher who can get them up on their website or other publication in near real time. That's amazing.
The combination of WiFi capability, JPEG capture, and in-camera editing allows the photographer to put out finished photos very quickly. That is enormously useful in many situations. The instant sales scenario that Mike mentioned above is another reason. Photojournalists covering rapidly evolving events is yet another.