I like the simplicity of this shot and the great colours. I would think that the shot would look great either way with or without the star trails.
rudgej Couch-potato photographer 5,613 posts Joined Jul 2005 More info | Jan 24, 2006 14:07 | #16 I like the simplicity of this shot and the great colours. I would think that the shot would look great either way with or without the star trails.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Adpully Member 74 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Oxford England More info | Jan 24, 2006 14:14 | #17 I like the colours and its powerful - But I think its all a bit too "central" for me I would have liked to see what it would be like using the 3rds rule. I also wondered if placing the camera a little lower and having the rocks break the horizon would give the shot even more power - That said its still a good picture ADPully
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 25, 2006 00:20 | #18 thanks again guys.. i'll have to try that adpully, next time im out there. everyone should really try and shoot a little after sunset..long exposure times are worth the wait the sky always looks rad. feel free to edit please.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yeleek Member 99 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Kent, UK More info | dietcookie wrote: Thanks for the comments guys. I'm assuming the trails are from stars.. nmac, and anyone else wondering technical details..the exposure was 8min @ f/8. saturation turned up within RSE, noise was removed with neat image and the curves were played with a bit. W/B was also changed because there was alot of spill from the surrounding area. this was also shot a little after sunset when the sky still had color to it. Excellent shot! But how did you get a 8min exposure?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Leorooster Cream of the Crop 6,749 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: New York More info | Jan 25, 2006 11:19 | #20 Great shots. Lovely colors and great composition! Canon 1DMarkIII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dimitri_V Cream of the Crop 9,221 posts Joined Nov 2004 Location: Scotland More info | Jan 25, 2006 11:30 | #21 Permanent bandietcookie wrote: nothing to it, just felt like sharing..
My site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yeleek wrote: Excellent shot! But how did you get a 8min exposure? Tripod and the outrageously priced canon timer. To get the exposure, walking into a scene I pretty much know what it's going to be at. That stuff is ingrained into my head. Another way to do night stuff (one of the perks of having a digital camera, and I have done this a few times) and get a pretty close reading is bump up the ISO all the way to 3200 open up the lens all the way and start with a simple short shutter, usually the camera will give a pretty decent reading. It could be telling you 2" @ f/4 ISO 3200. So if you wanna shoot ISO 100 F/8, that’s a 7 stop difference. So just work that into your shutter speed so the same exposure would around 256" or about 4-5 minutes. So then shoot it 4-5 minutes and bracket if you aren't seeing what you like. feel free to edit please.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
graykita Member 211 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Cincinnati More info | Jan 25, 2006 17:52 | #23 Great color and comp. Very nice. Graykita
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yeleek Member 99 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Kent, UK More info | Jan 26, 2006 03:03 | #24 Ahh i understand now - an external timer remote control? I was confused cos i thought the maximum was 30 seconds whatever was used. Thanks!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Balliolman Goldmember 4,150 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Cornwall/Kernow More info | Jan 26, 2006 12:51 | #25 Lovely shot, indeed! I cropped a little off the top and I think it made for a stronger composition ... Balliolman
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2380 guests, 104 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||