Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 24 Jul 2013 (Wednesday) 08:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Can airport security damage the sensor?

 
MikeFairbanks
Cream of the Crop
6,428 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2009
     
Jul 24, 2013 08:25 |  #1

X-ray machines. Do they permanently affect the sensors? Especially larger sensors?


Thank you. bw!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jaomul
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Cork, Ireland
     
Jul 24, 2013 08:27 |  #2

I work at an airport and have brought cameras in frequently through security x-ray machines with no issues


flickr (external link)
Olympus EM5,Nikon d7200,
Olympus 12-50mm, 40-150mm,17mm f2.8,Nikon 50mm F1.8, Tamron 90mm vc, 18-105mmVR, Sigma 18-35 f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
x_tan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,153 posts
Gallery: 137 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 511
Joined Sep 2010
Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ 'ǝuɹnoqlǝɯ
     
Jul 24, 2013 08:52 |  #3

Yes, this is why I'm upgrade my FF DSLR every 4-5 years ;)


Canon 5D3 + Zoom (EF 17-40L, 24-105L & 28-300L, 100-400L II) & Prime (24L II, 85L II, 100L, 135L & 200 f/2.8L II; Zeiss 1,4/35)
Sony α7r + Zeiss 1,8/55 FE
Nikon Coolpix A; Nikon F3 & F100 + Zeiss 1,4/50
Retiring  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Crimzon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,279 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 405
Joined May 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta
     
Jul 24, 2013 09:03 as a reply to  @ x_tan's post |  #4

I suppose if you had your camera turned on at the time, and in bulb mode, currently taking a picture.


My blog (external link)

Always feel free to provide constructive criticism to any of my pics.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,258 posts
Likes: 1527
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Jul 24, 2013 18:08 |  #5

No, in spite of what x-tan says.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MakisM1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,773 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jul 24, 2013 20:26 |  #6

x-tan is in cahoots with x-ray... ;)


Gerry
Canon R6 MkII/Canon 5D MkIII/Canon 60D/Canon EF-S 18-200/Canon EF 24-70L USM II/Canon EF 70-200L 2.8 USM II/Canon EF 50 f1.8 II/Σ 8-16/Σ 105ΕΧ DG/ 430 EXII
OS: Linux Ubuntu/PostProcessing: Darktable/Image Processing: GIMP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maverick75
Cream of the Crop
5,718 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 621
Joined May 2012
Location: Riverside,California
     
Jul 24, 2013 20:31 |  #7

Film has a warning on the boxes, none of my digital cameras have ever had one on theirs.


- Alex Corona Sony A7, Canon 7DM2/EOS M, Mamiya 645/67
Flickr (external link) - 500px (external link) - Website (external link)- Feedback -Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
x_tan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,153 posts
Gallery: 137 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 511
Joined Sep 2010
Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ 'ǝuɹnoqlǝɯ
     
Jul 24, 2013 20:38 |  #8

John from PA wrote in post #16150954 (external link)
No, in spite of what x-tan says.

MakisM1 wrote in post #16151278 (external link)
x-tan is in cahoots with x-ray... ;)

Sorry guys, I was high on Alcohol last night :oops:

Lets me try again:
Seem nothing happen to any of my cameras despite multiple X-Ray Scan so far;
But I do need some excuse to upgrade my camera, right? ;)


Canon 5D3 + Zoom (EF 17-40L, 24-105L & 28-300L, 100-400L II) & Prime (24L II, 85L II, 100L, 135L & 200 f/2.8L II; Zeiss 1,4/35)
Sony α7r + Zeiss 1,8/55 FE
Nikon Coolpix A; Nikon F3 & F100 + Zeiss 1,4/50
Retiring  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MakisM1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,773 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 551
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jul 24, 2013 20:45 |  #9

x_tan wrote in post #16151309 (external link)
Sorry guys, I was high on Alcohol last night :oops:

I was wondering... Your eyes are all bloodshot!:rolleyes:


Gerry
Canon R6 MkII/Canon 5D MkIII/Canon 60D/Canon EF-S 18-200/Canon EF 24-70L USM II/Canon EF 70-200L 2.8 USM II/Canon EF 50 f1.8 II/Σ 8-16/Σ 105ΕΧ DG/ 430 EXII
OS: Linux Ubuntu/PostProcessing: Darktable/Image Processing: GIMP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jul 25, 2013 04:19 |  #10

x_tan wrote in post #16151309 (external link)
Sorry guys, I was high on Alcohol last night :oops:

Lets me try again:
Seem nothing happen to any of my cameras despite multiple X-Ray Scan so far;
But I do need some excuse to upgrade my camera, right? ;)

a weak excuse but if it works




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
11,855 posts
Gallery: 264 photos
Likes: 6022
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Jul 25, 2013 04:21 |  #11

MikeFairbanks wrote in post #16149351 (external link)
X-ray machines. Do they permanently affect the sensors? Especially larger sensors?

only if they fall on them from a great height. Otherwise, nothing to worry about.


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeFairbanks
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
6,428 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2009
     
Jul 25, 2013 08:13 |  #12

I took it through anyway. No worries.

It's new, and I'm always a wee bit paranoid about new gadgets.


Thank you. bw!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vk2gwk
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,360 posts
Gallery: 332 photos
Likes: 1836
Joined Jun 2009
Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia
     
Jul 25, 2013 18:42 |  #13

Travelling all over the world with my cameras and the cameras have been through countless X-ray machines of various construction and quality but never noticed anything. So, no worries!


My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
Image Editing is allowed. Please explain what you did!
Canon R5, R,, RF24-105/1:4 + RF70-200mm F/2.8 + RF15-35mm F/2.8 + 50mm 1.4 USM + Sigma 150-600mm Sports + RF100mm F/2.8 + GODOX V860 IIC+ 430EX + YN568EXII, triggers, reflectors, umbrellas and some more bits and pieces...
Photos on: Flickr! (external link) and on my own web site. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M_Six
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,845 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Dec 2010
Location: East Central IL
     
Jul 25, 2013 18:46 |  #14

Xrays won't hurt your camera. The TSA folks on the other hand....:confused:


Mark J.
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tagnal
Goldmember
1,255 posts
Likes: 64
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Jul 25, 2013 20:38 |  #15

There was some controversy spreading about 2 years ago about how gamma rays at high altitudes while flying can damage the sensor. But, I believe that the consensus is that it was probably false or very unlikely since it seemed that those who fly all the time with their gear have stated that they haven't noticed their cameras pixels dying at all.

But, it is documented that when taking the camera up into space, the sensor does take damage and sometimes needs to be replaced after one mission.


5D3 / M3 / S100 / Σ 35 Art / 50 1.8 / 135 L / 17-40 L / 24-70 L / 70-200 f/4 IS L / m 22 2.0 / 580ex II
Toy List | flickr (external link) | FAA (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,515 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Can airport security damage the sensor?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1048 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.