Maybe it is temporary and/or an error, but if you search EOS M on Adorama it says the camera has been discontinued:
http://www.adorama.com …nd&sku=ICAMK&term=EOS%20M![]()
or
http://www.adorama.com/ICAMK.html?discontinued=t![]()
Billginthekeys Billy the kid 7,359 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Islamorada, FL More info | Jul 28, 2013 17:01 | #1 Maybe it is temporary and/or an error, but if you search EOS M on Adorama it says the camera has been discontinued: Mr. the Kid.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
babel_fish Goldmember 1,924 posts Likes: 18 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Seattle More info | Jul 28, 2013 19:53 | #2 My local camera shop has confirmed the same. "The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time." -Bertrand Russell
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pdrober2 Goldmember 2,318 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: Durham, NC More info | Jul 28, 2013 20:28 | #3 A lot of people said this was going to happen after the fire sale a few weeks ago. Fujifilm X-T1 | 23 | 27 | 56 | 90 | 55-200
LOG IN TO REPLY |
babel_fish Goldmember 1,924 posts Likes: 18 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Seattle More info | Jul 28, 2013 20:42 | #4 EOS M mk II with dual Pixel CMOS and WIFI, here we come... "The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time." -Bertrand Russell
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bob_A Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 28, 2013 20:43 | #5 Looks to me that an updated model is on the way. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nightdiver13 Unabashed nerd! 2,272 posts Likes: 38 Joined May 2010 Location: Bigfoot Country More info | Jul 28, 2013 21:14 | #6 Seems crazy that it would be discontinued before the replacement is available. — Neil
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gocolts Goldmember 1,246 posts Likes: 14 Joined Oct 2010 More info | Jul 28, 2013 22:10 | #7 Well...it seems like they only sold a handful of EOS-M's until the price went to $299 including a good lens, and now everyone has an EOS-M and is asking for more lenses....reality might be that unless Canon thinks they can get $800 for an EOS-M mkII, they're just not going to bother selling it in the U.S.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bps Cream of the Crop 7,607 posts Likes: 406 Joined Mar 2007 Location: California More info | Jul 28, 2013 22:56 | #8 |
Rstanford Member 201 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2009 More info | Jul 29, 2013 04:29 | #9 The lenses have also been discounted, B&H is throwing the 90ex flash in for free when you buy the kit, the 11-16 is not going to be released in the us. It sure seems that there doing more than just "making room for a new M."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
babel_fish Goldmember 1,924 posts Likes: 18 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Seattle More info | Jul 29, 2013 04:36 | #10 They have to pass the time somehow... Rstanford wrote in post #16162727 ..It sure seems that there doing more than just "making room for a new M." "The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time." -Bertrand Russell
LOG IN TO REPLY |
eddieb1 Senior Member 986 posts Likes: 227 Joined Apr 2013 Location: Oregon More info | Jul 29, 2013 04:39 | #11 It's still listed on canonusa.com, so who knows.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mpix345 Goldmember 2,870 posts Likes: 69 Joined Dec 2006 More info | Jul 29, 2013 07:28 | #12 gocolts wrote in post #16162254 Well...it seems like they only sold a handful of EOS-M's until the price went to $299 including a good lens, and now everyone has an EOS-M and is asking for more lenses....reality might be that unless Canon thinks they can get $800 for an EOS-M mkII, they're just not going to bother selling it in the U.S. As a car guy who likes German wagon's as his family's long-hauler, I know what it's like to have your favorite new car not be available in the country you live in, I just hope I'm wrong about the EOS-M, because I feel like between the better price and the firmware, Canon has a whole new fanbase for the EOS-M, that would be willing to put down some money for a few great lenses. I'm not sure about this. What I saw was a highly unpopular camera and people who are willing to buy anything if it is discounted enough. Not sure it is a strong signal to Canon that they can expect big lens sales, unless they want to be selling them for <$125.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
isoMorphic Goldmember 2,090 posts Joined May 2008 More info | Jul 29, 2013 07:30 | #13 mpix345 wrote in post #16162932 What I saw was a highly unpopular camera and people who are willing to buy anything if it is discounted enough. Canon can only blame themselves for that one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mpix345 Goldmember 2,870 posts Likes: 69 Joined Dec 2006 More info | Jul 29, 2013 08:12 | #14 isoMorphic wrote in post #16162937 Canon can only blame themselves for that one. Absolutely.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gocolts Goldmember 1,246 posts Likes: 14 Joined Oct 2010 More info | Jul 29, 2013 08:35 | #15 mpix345 wrote in post #16162932 I'm not sure about this. What I saw was a highly unpopular camera and people who are willing to buy anything if it is discounted enough. Not sure it is a strong signal to Canon that they can expect big lens sales, unless they want to be selling them for <$125. You could have a point about the $125 lenses...I know that I'd be hesitant to buy more EOS-M lenses for much more than that if I knew they weren't going to progress the EOS-M line at all.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 819 guests, 145 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||