Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 28 Jul 2013 (Sunday) 20:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

EOS M Review - Updates and samples to be posted

 
dinanm3atl
Goldmember
Avatar
3,123 posts
Likes: 109
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Jul 28, 2013 20:53 |  #1

My review. I will put it through more 'testing' than some might as I use my cameras for motorsports... subject tracking will be used and put to the rest! Figured an in depth and updated review might help others. I also went from a Sony Nex 5N to the EOS M so my review might help some on the edge of a decision.


Day One.

I purchased the EOS M on the huge instant rebate. At 299.99 plus 99.99 for the camera, 22mm lens and EF adapter it was a no brainer. I sold my Nex 5N for a profit and walked away with ~100 dollars cash. I did want to buy the EOS M as soon as it was announced but like any new camera tech I wait. And 110% glad I did since the initial release's focus issues would have sent me over the edge. With rebate and the sample videos of the updated firmware I was sold. Special bonus is one could now use their EF lenses but with the Nex 5N adapters were needed and lose features.


Build Quality - It's well built. It feels much more substantial, although it is physically smaller, than the Nex 5N. It has some weight. More than one would imange when going to pick it up. I like that. All the buttons, wheels and screen feel nice to the touch. It doesn't come with much though in the box. Camera, lens, strap, manuals, battery/charger and one cable. Don't think you need much else but lots were in older dSLR boxes.

Screen - This is really nice. I think it is better than the 5D MKII and 7D. Nicest I have seen on a camera. I would say maybe it is the same as the 1Dx? Colors are vibrant. What you see is what you get which is nice. It has capacitive(sp?) touch screen so can multi-zoon and pretty effortless to browse around.


IMAGE: http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l227/mdywglr4x4/20130728_213628_zpsf4391ec1.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://s97.photobucket​.com …3628_zpsf4391ec​1.jpg.html  (external link)

IMAGE: http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l227/mdywglr4x4/20130728_213643_zps6f7d5f55.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://s97.photobucket​.com …3643_zps6f7d5f5​5.jpg.html  (external link)


Ergonomics - It is small. It easily fits in a pocket or a normal sized hand. However it's not 'too small' in my opinion. It could use a larger 'grip' like what is present on the Sony's. Controls are easy to use. Menus are quick and easy. All the custom functions will be familiar to a Canon shooter. All are the same.


IMAGE: http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l227/mdywglr4x4/20130728_213513_zpseb81d603.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://s97.photobucket​.com …3513_zpseb81d60​3.jpg.html  (external link)


IMAGE: http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l227/mdywglr4x4/20130728_213445_zpsd7655ad3.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://s97.photobucket​.com …3445_zpsd7655ad​3.jpg.html  (external link)


Shooting - Is great. As easy and good as the Nex 5N. Focus is quick and accurate. Even with the adapter and 300mm f/2.8L it grabs focus quick. Even in a moving car it could lock onto items going by down the road. Really happy with this aspect of the camera.


Focus Test Video - This is inside at 10pm. Just overhead light bulbs that are halogen. To give you an idea on AUTO ISO the camera wants to use 1/30(f/4.5 on 22mm "Kit") of a second and ISO 3200. It's not well lit. Outdoor this test is ~2-3x as fast. So that is pretty darn good.


http://www.youtube.com …=UU2ym1n879A4-8rGEy-HIStA (external link)


Sample Photos from today. Will add some high ISO items here shortly.


EOS M - Adapter - EF 300mm f/2.8L

IMAGE: http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2836/9389916500_5c362e2b9c_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/dinanm3atl/9389​916500/  (external link)
BMW E21 323i Baur TC1 01 (external link) by Halston Pitman | MotorSportMedia (external link), on Flickr


EOS M - 22mm "Kit"

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7376/9387141039_46a7c16894_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/dinanm3atl/9387​141039/  (external link)
BMW E21 323i Baur TC1 02 (external link) by Halston Pitman | MotorSportMedia (external link), on Flickr


EOS M - 22mm "KIT"

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3714/9389189480_4403021872_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/dinanm3atl/9389​189480/  (external link)
1971 Pontiac GTO Orange Muscle Car 455ci 455 Big Block 11 (external link) by Halston Pitman | MotorSportMedia (external link), on Flickr

More to come. Some high ISO. Subject tracking. Maybe a video? Going to take it to the track and try to pan with it :)

Halston - MotorSports Photographer
1Dx - 1Dx - A7r - 400L f/2.8 - 70-200L f/2.8 - 24-105L f/4 - 17-40L f/4 - 50 f/1.4 - 8mm f/3.5 Fisheye - 1.4x TC - 2x TC
Photography Site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jul 28, 2013 22:38 |  #2

I think it's funny that the camera has been out for a year, is not being discontinued and only because of the phenomenal price drop to offload stock do people buy in.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dinanm3atl
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,123 posts
Likes: 109
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Jul 28, 2013 22:44 |  #3

Talley wrote in post #16162332 (external link)
I think it's funny that the camera has been out for a year, is not being discontinued and only because of the phenomenal price drop to offload stock do people buy in.

Why is that? At 599.99 and it's terrible focus performance at release it wasn't a good buy. With an improved focus system(a huge improvement) and 1/2 price it's becomes a good buy.

Why is that 'funny'?


Halston - MotorSports Photographer
1Dx - 1Dx - A7r - 400L f/2.8 - 70-200L f/2.8 - 24-105L f/4 - 17-40L f/4 - 50 f/1.4 - 8mm f/3.5 Fisheye - 1.4x TC - 2x TC
Photography Site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jul 28, 2013 22:56 |  #4

dinanm3atl wrote in post #16162345 (external link)
Why is that? At 599.99 and it's terrible focus performance at release it wasn't a good buy. With an improved focus system(a huge improvement) and 1/2 price it's becomes a good buy.

Why is that 'funny'?

I meant funny that now it has gained popularity of the price drop and already being out a year and we see reviews like this come up as if the product is a new release.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Indecent ­ Exposure
Goldmember
Avatar
3,402 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
     
Jul 29, 2013 00:54 |  #5

Talley wrote in post #16162370 (external link)
I meant funny that now it has gained popularity of the price drop and already being out a year and we see reviews like this come up as if the product is a new release.

Probably because it is performing like a new product.


- James -
www.feedthewant.com (external link)
500px (external link)
Gear List and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dinanm3atl
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,123 posts
Likes: 109
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Jul 29, 2013 13:52 |  #6

Triggers? Sure!


IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3719/9393106377_ebfbbfb8d8_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/dinanm3atl/9393​106377/  (external link)
EOS M Light Test Product Shoot Canon 5d MKII 01 (external link) by Halston Pitman | MotorSportMedia (external link), on Flickr

ISO 3200

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7322/9395873590_ab90628edf_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/dinanm3atl/9395​873590/  (external link)
Shih Tzu Canon EOS M ISO 3200 Test 01 (external link) by Halston Pitman | MotorSportMedia (external link), on Flickr

ISO 5000

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7291/9393097999_34102f969d_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/dinanm3atl/9393​097999/  (external link)
Shih Tzu Canon EOS M ISO 5000 Test 02 (external link) by Halston Pitman | MotorSportMedia (external link), on Flickr

Halston - MotorSports Photographer
1Dx - 1Dx - A7r - 400L f/2.8 - 70-200L f/2.8 - 24-105L f/4 - 17-40L f/4 - 50 f/1.4 - 8mm f/3.5 Fisheye - 1.4x TC - 2x TC
Photography Site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
djphatjive
Member
Avatar
247 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Thornton, Co
     
Sep 27, 2013 19:44 |  #7

I heard the price drop is because of a successor coming out.


Canon T2i Rebel with...
Canon EF-S 18-55mm lens, Canon EF-S 55-250mm lens, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
PowerShot SD1400 IS
www.glissmann.net (external link) I make music too. www.soundcloud.com/djp​hatjive (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
peeaanuut
Goldmember
Avatar
3,560 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 708
Joined Feb 2011
     
Sep 27, 2013 19:49 |  #8

I had wanted it since it was announced, sadly it was out of my price range at the time. It was only for the price drop that it made it affordable to me. I dont think that people think its new, I think that they finally see some value to it especially with the lack of native lenses to complete the compact package.


Stuff
http://joetakesphotos.​com/ (external link) : | : https://www.facebook.c​om/JKlingPhotos (external link) : | : https://twitter.com/jk​lingphotos (external link)
airbutchie - Joe was definitely right about adding contrast...
:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
barn9
Member
Avatar
224 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Land of OZ
     
Sep 28, 2013 09:37 |  #9

dinanm3atl wrote in post #16162345 (external link)
Why is that? At 599.99 and it's terrible focus performance at release it wasn't a good buy. With an improved focus system(a huge improvement) and 1/2 price it's becomes a good buy.

Why is that 'funny'?

Considering buying one of these, could you explain what changed, as in was there a model change? What should a person look for if buying off ebay (seems to be plenty of them there for sale) or elsewhere?
Sorry to sound dumb, but I just have not paid much attention to the M till now. Also curious as to what adapter would work with FD lenses, as I have a few from old film cameras.
Thanks for any help, appreciate it! :)


_______________
Canon EOS Rebel T3i 600D
Canon EOS M
Canon S95, Canon SX30is
Canon S5is, Canon A2000is

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
peeaanuut
Goldmember
Avatar
3,560 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 708
Joined Feb 2011
     
Sep 28, 2013 10:24 |  #10

when it first arrived the AF was a bit slow. There was a recent firmware update that sped that up.


Stuff
http://joetakesphotos.​com/ (external link) : | : https://www.facebook.c​om/JKlingPhotos (external link) : | : https://twitter.com/jk​lingphotos (external link)
airbutchie - Joe was definitely right about adding contrast...
:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrickR
Cream of the Crop
5,935 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Dallas TX
     
Sep 28, 2013 13:22 |  #11

I like that Canon went with an APSc sensor in the M, but they went very P&S with the layout...which I completely understand. The build quality is really good so that's not the issue. The initial price and AF performance is what doomed it.
I would love to see an M with a layout similar to the SL1 for more direct DLSR type handling, even if it doesn't have a VF. A dial, custom Fn button or dedicated Av/ISO button, and then add a few more pancake lenses :)

The current M had so many buyers with the fire sell it would really be stupid of Canon to not realize that they may have taken a loss but gained a large customer base for future lenses ;)


My junk
The grass isn't greener on the other side, it's green where you water it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dinanm3atl
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,123 posts
Likes: 109
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Sep 28, 2013 21:23 |  #12

barn9 wrote in post #16331165 (external link)
Considering buying one of these, could you explain what changed, as in was there a model change? What should a person look for if buying off ebay (seems to be plenty of them there for sale) or elsewhere?
Sorry to sound dumb, but I just have not paid much attention to the M till now. Also curious as to what adapter would work with FD lenses, as I have a few from old film cameras.
Thanks for any help, appreciate it! :)


Same model. Supposedly new one coming.

Updated firmware.

Should be able to adapt I assume. Not 100%. I use the M to EF Canon adapter.


Halston - MotorSports Photographer
1Dx - 1Dx - A7r - 400L f/2.8 - 70-200L f/2.8 - 24-105L f/4 - 17-40L f/4 - 50 f/1.4 - 8mm f/3.5 Fisheye - 1.4x TC - 2x TC
Photography Site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canoncreate
Member
71 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: India
     
Sep 29, 2013 02:54 |  #13

How did you get this ISO5000 ? My M goes straight to 6400 from 3200.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dinanm3atl
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,123 posts
Likes: 109
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Oct 01, 2013 23:02 |  #14

The 5D shot is not ISO5000.


Halston - MotorSports Photographer
1Dx - 1Dx - A7r - 400L f/2.8 - 70-200L f/2.8 - 24-105L f/4 - 17-40L f/4 - 50 f/1.4 - 8mm f/3.5 Fisheye - 1.4x TC - 2x TC
Photography Site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,007 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5395
Joined Oct 2012
Location: GA Mountains
     
Oct 02, 2013 02:55 |  #15

canoncreate wrote in post #16332717 (external link)
How did you get this ISO5000 ? My M goes straight to 6400 from 3200.

When set to auto-ISO it will use mid-stops.


Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)www.LucasGPhoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,428 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
EOS M Review - Updates and samples to be posted
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1316 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.