Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 30 Jul 2013 (Tuesday) 10:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

PreBridal-Emily

 
flipcrab85
Member
Avatar
241 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 133
Joined Oct 2009
     
Jul 30, 2013 10:57 |  #1

A couple from a recent prebridal session...

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/07/5/LQ_657801.jpg
Image hosted by forum (657801) © flipcrab85 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/07/5/LQ_657802.jpg
Image hosted by forum (657802) © flipcrab85 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Nikon D4, D3s, Nikkor 28-70 2.8, Nikkor 80-200 2.8 af-s, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 14mm 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GlynT
Member
71 posts
Joined Nov 2012
     
Jul 30, 2013 14:42 |  #2

Hi,

These are very nice. I especially like the light on her face on the first one...

Being hyper-critical I'd say that the hands need a bit of a tweak on no. 1. The one on her face needs to move back a touch as it threatens to overpower the face and the other one needs turning sideways a bit more to make it less dominant.

On the second I'd prefer it if the veil and the dress were the same colour, even though I realise they probably weren't in reality. I want them both to be white or both to be off-white...


GT-Images.net (external link):hotel photography (external link) | resort photographer (external link) | property photography (external link) | property photographer (external link) | interior photography (external link) | hotel photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Jul 30, 2013 15:51 |  #3

On 2, I keep getting drawn to her left (camera right) earring, which is just peeking out from her cheek, making it look like some funky skin imperfection or something. You may want to get that out of there.

But I do like them.


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,909 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16339
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Jul 30, 2013 17:00 |  #4

I like the second one much better than the first. What's wrong with the first, you ask? To start with, the bride's facial expression; she looks bored or skeptical or something. In some subtle way, her eyes don't quite match, possibly an effect of the lighting or compression of her face by the hand she's leaning on. Her hair doesn't stand out enough from the background. The railing should be level. The second photo has none of these problems. The bride looks very pleasant there.

GlynT wrote in post #16167287 (external link)
On the second I'd prefer it if the veil and the dress were the same colour, even though I realise they probably weren't in reality. I want them both to be white or both to be off-white...

Just guessing, but that might not be possible in the shot as set up. The veil may have picked up some green from the background.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | Comments welcome
Progress toward a new forum being developed by POTN members:
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1531051

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bikfoto
Alexander the Wannabe
Avatar
423 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Jul 30, 2013 18:14 |  #5

I agree with the poster above. In the first photo, if the model was looking away, it would create a totally different image of feminine subject. The 2nd photo is great!


bikfoto (external link)
Need a WEBSITE? (external link)
Gear & Feedback
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flipcrab85
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
241 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 133
Joined Oct 2009
     
Jul 31, 2013 07:09 |  #6

Thanks! appreciate the feedback!!


Nikon D4, D3s, Nikkor 28-70 2.8, Nikkor 80-200 2.8 af-s, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 14mm 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
geparry
Member
80 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: Salt Lake City
     
Jul 31, 2013 09:42 as a reply to  @ flipcrab85's post |  #7

For the first photo I like the concept but the hand should be sideways and not pointing out towards the camera. You should also avoid 90 degree bends of the elbow so having the arm come out more to the side and the hand resting on the banister might be an ideal fix. Lighting might be better with a main light camera left and fill light on the right for the veil. You might want to feather the lighting to place key exposure on her face instead of arm and dress.

You have a lot of shadows showing up on her body and you might need to ditch the pearls for this type of shot where they are hanging off the neck instead of resting on the skin. You also have some blown out highlights on the dress and banister. The background has a bright vertical light line above her head that should be closed out

I really like the second photo, she looks great and the background has a nice colors and great bokeh. The background vertical line is not true so you might consider realigning the verticals. The lighting is flat and although it works okay here I would try turning her head more to her right and use short lighting with the main light camera left. This would also help with the loss of detail in her hair on her right side.

Next time I would have her put more weight on the back foot, the shoulders seem a touch too straight. You might also have her right arm angled slightly away from the body. Please note that these comments are all tweaks to photo that already works and with which I am sure she is happy.


Canon 5D MarkIII 24-105 F4 L IS | 100 F2.8 macro| 85mm 1.8 | 70-200 F2.8 L IS MK II | TS-E 40mm 2.8 | 50mm 1.4 | 20mm 2.8 | 300mm 4.0 L IS
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,100 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
PreBridal-Emily
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
887 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.