Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 31 Jul 2013 (Wednesday) 04:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

20D vs 6D AF

 
kram
obvious its pointless
2,612 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2005
     
Jul 31, 2013 04:12 |  #1

How do the autofocus on these two compare?

I am planning to replace my 20d with the 6d....


Canon 7D , Canon 6D, 100-400 L, 24-105 F4 L, 50 F1.4, Tokina 12-24 F4, Kenko Teleplus Pro DG 1.4X Extender
My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WhenIWake
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 7
Joined May 2011
Location: Scotland
     
Jul 31, 2013 05:46 |  #2

Im petty sure that the AF on the 6D will be far superior to the AF on the 20D.

11 AF points vs 9 on the 20D.

Unless you meant the 60D?


5D II | 40D | 350D | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 | Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4.0-5.6 IS USM | EF 35mm f/1.4L
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Naito
Member
172 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Toronto
     
Jul 31, 2013 07:37 |  #3

Not even remotely comparable, 6d trumps 20d in accuracy, speed, sensitivity. 20d is what, 10 years old now?? Did you really expect otherwise? :)


Carl
EOS 40D | 6D

40mm f/2.8 STM | 50mm f/1.8 II | Tamron SP 70-300 f/4-5.6 Di VC | Opteka 500mm f/6.3 Mirror
Metz 50-AF1 | Yongnuo YN-622C

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jnadz
Senior Member
279 posts
Joined Feb 2012
     
Jul 31, 2013 07:41 |  #4

Yes accuracy would be roughly the same as reliability. Precision is different. So maybe he meant to say the precision of both will be about the same but the accuracy may differ slightly... Whether or not this statement is true, I'm not sure, but I would think the 6D's focus system would be superior. When canon wants to slightly cripple one aspect of a camera (like the focus on the 6D) so as not to cannibalize other cameras (5DIII), they tend to use a similar system to one that's already in place on either a lower line of camera or a system that's 1-2 years old... Since the 20D is much older than that, my guess is that, just based on the progression of technology alone, the 6D is better


5D Mark III | SL1 | EOS-M | S100
Rokinon 14 f2.8 | Σ35 f1.4 Art | Canon 40 f2.8 | Canon 50 f1.8 mark I | Canon 100L | Canon 135L | Canon 70-300L
Canon EF-M 11-22 | Canon EF-M 22 f2 | Canon EF-M 55-200

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jul 31, 2013 07:42 |  #5

Naito wrote in post #16169150 (external link)
Not even remotely comparable, 6d trumps 20d in accuracy, speed, sensitivity. 20d is what, 10 years old now?? Did you really expect otherwise? :)

# of years between cameras may not always tell the complete story. There were 4-5 years between the 5D and 5D2, however no difference really in AF. It really depends on the type of AF sensors employed, #, algorithmic changes, etc.

That being said, I am sure the AF points are more sensitive, coupled with better processing and algorithms, on the 6D over the 20D. It will focus better in lower light too, I expect.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kram
THREAD ­ STARTER
obvious its pointless
2,612 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2005
     
Jul 31, 2013 07:43 |  #6

Just wanted to be doubly sure :)

It will be my first trial at a full frame and while I don't expect the af to match the 7d, it has to at least beat the 20d....


Canon 7D , Canon 6D, 100-400 L, 24-105 F4 L, 50 F1.4, Tokina 12-24 F4, Kenko Teleplus Pro DG 1.4X Extender
My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jul 31, 2013 07:47 |  #7

You will be fine with the 6D AF, and you will undoubtedly love the images. Your 20D will be made obsolete, because you won't need the APS-C factor. If you crop the 6D images down to a 1.6 view, you will end up with the same resolution roughly as your 20D, same DOF, etc.

If I had a 20D/30D and went with any of the 20+ mpx FF bodies, I most likely would sell or give away the old bodies as they just wouldn't be necessary any longer, unless I needed some old backup camera. They really offer no advantage other than backup capability.

Good luck with your decision!


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nemofoto
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Jul 2013
     
Jul 31, 2013 08:49 |  #8

Hello,

I am a brand new "forumer" while I have been visiting this website for a long time as I find it really interesting. Excuse my "french", or in this case my english as I am french and I don't speak english in the same way as my mother tongue.

I have a 6d,and I had before a 5dII. What I can say is that the 6d has an amazing AF system. It is working perfectly even if in some extreme cases the outer points work hardlier than the center point.

The 6d is a great machine. It is perfectly built and its size and weight are just perfect. I com from a 5dII and i love my 6d much more than the 5dII. I had a 40d before and i have the same feeling as this older body in term of size, weight and reactivity. Moreover, it has new features very usefull ad funny. A must have!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jaomul
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Cork, Ireland
     
Jul 31, 2013 08:52 |  #9

Nemofoto wrote in post #16169334 (external link)
Hello,

I am a brand new "forumer" while I have been visiting this website for a long time as I find it really interesting. Excuse my "french", or in this case my english as I am french and I don't speak english in the same way as my mother tongue.

I have a 6d,and I had before a 5dII. What I can say is that the 6d has an amazing AF system. It is working perfectly even if in some extreme cases the outer points work hardlier than the center point.

The 6d is a great machine. It is perfectly built and its size and weight are just perfect. I com from a 5dII and i love my 6d much more than the 5dII. I had a 40d before and i have the same feeling as this older body in term of size, weight and reactivity. Moreover, it has new features very usefull ad funny. A must have!

Welcome to the forum. Be sure to post some photos when you get a chance


flickr (external link)
Olympus EM5,Nikon d7200,
Olympus 12-50mm, 40-150mm,17mm f2.8,Nikon 50mm F1.8, Tamron 90mm vc, 18-105mmVR, Sigma 18-35 f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jul 31, 2013 09:18 |  #10

Nemofoto wrote in post #16169334 (external link)
Hello,

I am a brand new "forumer" while I have been visiting this website for a long time as I find it really interesting. Excuse my "french", or in this case my english as I am french and I don't speak english in the same way as my mother tongue.

I have a 6d,and I had before a 5dII. What I can say is that the 6d has an amazing AF system. It is working perfectly even if in some extreme cases the outer points work hardlier than the center point.

The 6d is a great machine. It is perfectly built and its size and weight are just perfect. I com from a 5dII and i love my 6d much more than the 5dII. I had a 40d before and i have the same feeling as this older body in term of size, weight and reactivity. Moreover, it has new features very usefull ad funny. A must have!

I understood you perfectly! I expect that the 20D, 5D, and 5D2 all had very similar AF systems, as there were too many changes between those particular models and generations. Canon really started to work on AF performance on the 7D and subsequent bodies, and now we have a great 5D3 FF sports-capable body, and the 6D is improved, etc. Canon is starting to kick things into gear over the past few years!

Welcome to POTN, we look forward to samples shots in the 6D photo thread: https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1252637


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ElectronGuru
Senior Member
Avatar
427 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Oregon
     
Jul 31, 2013 10:58 |  #11

kram wrote in post #16169165 (external link)
Just wanted to be doubly sure :)

I went from the 20D to the 6D, with a few years in the middle on a 7D. One of my reasons for choosing the 6D was to get back to the simplicity I had with the 20D. For my slow careful work (main use), the 7D was overkill-complicated.

Comparing the 20D to the 6D, the new focus system looks the same, but feels amplified. The only surprise is that the center point is so good, it kind of hogs all the fun, creating a bias toward the center, even when all points are turned on. And there's some debat as to the effect:

https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1318540


Overall, you'll be pleased. The sensor cleaner alone is worth the move!


"Light is the paint, lenses are brush, sensors are the canvas"
6D | 100L Macro | 50L | 24L TSE
Builder of custom flashlights, OVEREADY.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,007 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5395
Joined Oct 2012
Location: GA Mountains
     
Jul 31, 2013 11:27 |  #12

kram wrote in post #16169165 (external link)
Just wanted to be doubly sure :)

It will be my first trial at a full frame and while I don't expect the af to match the 7d, it has to at least beat the 20d....

A lot of users who add a 6D to the stable end up neglecting their 7D, so don't write it off yet ;)

It all depends on what you shoot. I use my outer points pretty commonly, especially when shooting in portrait orientation and I rarely find that the focus isn't quick or accurate (depending on what lens I'm using).

I had a 20D a few years ago, there's really no comparison.


Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)www.LucasGPhoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nemofoto
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Jul 2013
     
Aug 01, 2013 03:13 |  #13

TeamSpeed wrote in post #16169419 (external link)
I understood you perfectly! I expect that the 20D, 5D, and 5D2 all had very similar AF systems, as there were too many changes between those particular models and generations. Canon really started to work on AF performance on the 7D and subsequent bodies, and now we have a great 5D3 FF sports-capable body, and the 6D is improved, etc. Canon is starting to kick things into gear over the past few years!

Welcome to POTN, we look forward to samples shots in the 6D photo thread: https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1252637

Thanks Jaomul and TeamSpeed, I am happy to notice that what I said is undestandable :)
I really think as you said, that the 6d is a really good body and Canon has improved a lot its latest products. The most impressive thing is how pleasant to use it is. Great piece of work ! The only thing that I dislike vs my old 5dII is the rendering of its photos. The 5dII looked sharper while in reality, viewing at 100%, the 6d is really better. It is a strange feeling. The blur seems more pronouced on the 5dII too. But I also think I have to parametrize my brand new body :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,253 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
20D vs 6D AF
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
495 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.