Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 01 Aug 2013 (Thursday) 20:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Head Shot Fee

 
jptsr1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,845 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 116
Joined Sep 2006
Location: From The Bronx NY but living in Singapore
     
Aug 03, 2013 10:45 |  #31

$200.00 for 2 to 4 "good" shots and 1 hour of your time. I'm no pro (far far from it) but I recently took some shots for a young lady who begged me to over my protest of not being a professional photographer and thats what she paid me. After I took the photos and tweaked them a bit she asked "how much" i said "nothing" and she gave me $200 (forced it on me actually). i assume that must be either near the going rate or somewhat below because i have had several more request follow from friends of hers/ours. she came to my house and my stuff is already set up in my makeshift studio. i would think if i had to travel and set things up then that would need to be added to the price.


Et Facta Est Lux
My Gear
Flickrexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RockSlut
Senior Member
Avatar
780 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
     
Aug 03, 2013 12:20 |  #32

Lowner wrote in post #16174822 (external link)
No, you just don't want to answer the question!

I've noticed this "reticence" before, pro's just don't like sharing information.

Go and check out www.production-stills.co.uk/tech-talk (external link) then tell me how "pro's don't like sharing information".

I was suggesting to the OP that there are a bunch of considerations that should go into determining pricing and giving him some places to start so he could do so in an informed manner.


Angus
www.angusyoung.com.au (external link)
Movie Stills Photography www.production-stills.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Aug 03, 2013 12:46 |  #33

RockSlut wrote in post #16178054 (external link)
Go and check out www.production-stills.co.uk/tech-talk (external link) then tell me how "pro's don't like sharing information".

I was suggesting to the OP that there are a bunch of considerations that should go into determining pricing and giving him some places to start so he could do so in an informed manner.

I don't need to check out your web link, Its very apparent from this site over a period of time that pro's are very "careful" when it comes to sharing pricing information. Not just this particular request, but many different ones, the answer is the same - "go figure it out yourself" or words to that effect.

This is not what I'd have expected.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Foodguy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,324 posts
Likes: 217
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Having too much fun in the studio
     
Aug 03, 2013 12:47 |  #34

Lowner wrote in post #16177289 (external link)
None of this is answering the OP's question.

It is not rocket science, so come on, tell the man!

Because there really isn't an answer to the question of what *he* should charge. Had he asked what others might charge, it would be an entirely different situation.


My answer for most photography questions: "it depends...'

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RockSlut
Senior Member
Avatar
780 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
     
Aug 03, 2013 13:00 |  #35

In the OP's area he can probably find competitors charging $50 with a DVD including all raw files or $1000+ for 1-2 retouched shots. Photography pricing is not something that can be established by posting a single line of information on the internet.

This forum is hugely forthcoming with information and there are photographers all over the world many of whom are in this forum sharing intimate information about their businesses with other photographers for free.

How is me telling him I charge £160 for an head shot session on the other side of the planet helpful? It isn't.

Even if I were to compare my work to his the information is pretty meaningless down to a range of considerations including those I suggested in my initial reply.


Angus
www.angusyoung.com.au (external link)
Movie Stills Photography www.production-stills.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sydneyshooter
Member
43 posts
Joined Jul 2013
     
Aug 04, 2013 03:44 |  #36
bannedPermanent ban
SPAM PUT AWAY
This post is marked as spam.
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Aug 04, 2013 04:10 |  #37

RockSlut wrote in post #16178132 (external link)
How is me telling him I charge £160 for an head shot session on the other side of the planet helpful? It isn't.

Oh yes it is, that's exactly what he asked for.

Now how hard was that? You can go and have a sit down now and recover from the shock.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
memoriesoftomorrow
Goldmember
3,846 posts
Likes: 293
Joined Nov 2010
     
Aug 04, 2013 04:14 |  #38

At least $600 per headshot... no... $650 :rolleyes:

That was useful wasn't it?


Peter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
banquetbear
Goldmember
Avatar
1,601 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 156
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Aug 04, 2013 04:47 |  #39

Lowner wrote in post #16179576 (external link)
Oh yes it is, that's exactly what he asked for.

Now how hard was that? You can go and have a sit down now and recover from the shock.

...actually if you had been reading the thread properly you would have noted that several people have posted exact figures: its obvious you haven't though.

So we've had figures of $650 AUS, $600 AUS, $196.51 US, $50.00 US, 160 pounds UK, $130 NZ, another $50.00 US per shot, $150.00 per hour, and $500.00 US. How on earth did you manage to miss all those definitive answers?

So based on the information provided by the OP: which is the correct answer?


www.bigmark.co.nzexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kronie
Goldmember
Avatar
2,183 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jun 2008
     
Aug 04, 2013 06:39 |  #40

The correct answer is still the same: It depends.

I would guess the average around here would be about $100 to maybe $300 tops, depending on the photographer. You could find a facebook momtographer to do it for $50 or you could go to the big studio and pay $300.

I highly doubt that there are any photographers in my area commanding $500 for one head shot, but I could be wrong.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Aug 04, 2013 07:09 |  #41

banquetbear wrote in post #16179607 (external link)
...actually if you had been reading the thread properly you would have noted that several people have posted exact figures: its obvious you haven't though.

So we've had figures of $650 AUS, $600 AUS, $196.51 US, $50.00 US, 160 pounds UK, $130 NZ, another $50.00 US per shot, $150.00 per hour, and $500.00 US. How on earth did you manage to miss all those definitive answers?

So based on the information provided by the OP: which is the correct answer?

I have not missed it at, but to answer your question, only the OP can tell. But at least the requested information is there. Its up to him what use he makes of it. Why it had to be so difficult to obtain I still don't understand.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
banquetbear
Goldmember
Avatar
1,601 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 156
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Aug 04, 2013 07:31 |  #42

Lowner wrote in post #16179740 (external link)
I have not missed it at, but to answer your question, only the OP can tell.

...which, if I'm not mistaken, is exactly the point made in post two that you disputed. Concession accepted.

But at least the requested information is there. Its up to him what use he makes of it. Why it had to be so difficult to obtain I still don't understand.

...the question asked by the OP wasn't "what do you charge." It was "what should I charge." The first question is easily answered and has been answered by people. The second one is not easily answered without more information from the OP. Which is something you have just conceded.

So why are you claiming that something is "difficult to obtain" when it obviously wasn't?

Are you still going to insist that photographers in this forum "don't share" despite overwhelming evidence in this very thread that they do? Are you ever going to actually share with us the details of one of your "multi-million dollar quotes" and the details of your competitors quotes so that we can see if they were only pennies apart or not?

The "answers" given by the photographers in this thread weren't "pennies apart." They were hundreds of dollars apart and that was due to a number of different factors, many of those factors would have been settled if the questions posed in post two of this thread had been answered. But of course this is obvious: and of course you know this. So why you continue to insist otherwise is only a question that you can answer.


www.bigmark.co.nzexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
breal101
Goldmember
2,724 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Aug 2006
     
Aug 04, 2013 07:50 |  #43

Here's the website for one of the better known portrait studios in Texas. This because the OP is located in Texas.

http://www.gittings.co​m (external link)

If you can find a price quote on the site without contacting them directly and providing details you did better than I could. If the OP's work is equal to what they can do you could draw some conclusions as to how to price the job. Otherwise it's just guess work.

There are too many factors involved to give a concrete answer to the question.


"Try to go out empty and let your images fill you up." Jay Maisel

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drvnbysound
Goldmember
3,316 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Aug 2009
     
Aug 04, 2013 09:19 |  #44

Headshots for a single client for professional purposes...

I assume that you can get the shot you need in 10 shots or less. Let's assume that you are shooting with strobe's at 1/200th. So, 10 shots equates to 0.05s of shooting. Assuming you need to make $50/hr to sustain your business... means you should charge $0.007 :lol:


I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
..::Gear Listing::.. --==Feedback==--
...A few umbrella brackets I own...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
darksike
Senior Member
Avatar
547 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2009
Location: toms river, nj
     
Aug 04, 2013 12:43 |  #45

If I remember correctly, Peter Hurley does head shots at $1,000 booking fee. Sends it out to his retoucher that's an added fee. Then to the printing company for $$ per print.
So maybe around $1,200-$1,500 for a headshot session.


all experts were once a beginner
addicted since May '09
Gear - Site (external link) -
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,293 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it.
Head Shot Fee
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
556 guests, 151 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.