Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 04 Aug 2013 (Sunday) 12:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

17-40mm for 6d?

 
Huraifiha
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2013
     
Aug 04, 2013 12:53 |  #1

Hi, I'm new here
I'm upgrading my canon 550D to a 6D :)
I mainly shoot portraits or group of people that are indoor and the iso performance with the 550D is really bad. So after reading a lot i found that the 6D is a great low light camera.
The kit lens am getting is the 24-105mm.

I also like to shoot landscapes so I'm thinking of getting the 17-40mm for it but dunno if i'll need it since i have the 24-105.
Also, I currently have the 50mm 1.8 for portrait but heard it doesn't work as good with a FF body, so i'm thinking of getting the 85mm 1.8.

I can't buy both at the same time so help me decide what I should get first and I'm open to new lenses if there are any.


Haider
Canon 6D | 17-40 | 24-70 | 70-200 | 85 f1.8 | 40 |
| Flickr (external link) | | 500 (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
Aug 04, 2013 13:07 |  #2

Hello, welcome to POTN.

I have both the 24-105 and the 17-40. I use the 24-105 when I want to just carry 1 lens around without having to worry about changing or when I don't know what I'll be shooting specifically. When I know I'm going out to shoot landscapes, I take the 17-40 along with the 70-200 because they cover my preferred landscape focal lengths perfectly.

Whichever you get first depends on what you want. Personally I'd go for the 17-40 first because I love UWA.


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,402 posts
Gallery: 111 photos
Likes: 518
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan / South Carolina
     
Aug 04, 2013 15:02 |  #3

Since you currently use your 50mm f/1.8 for portraits, I would first add the 85mm f/1.8 to replace that functionality on the 6D. You can then take your time to decide if the wide end of the 24-105L is wide enough for your landscape shooting.

While I do own a 17-40L, I find that 24mm is wide enough for the vast majority of my landscape shooting. An UWA is a nice tool to have, but you need to know when to use one.. and when not to.


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
victordeng
Member
Avatar
126 posts
Joined Dec 2012
Location: United States
     
Aug 04, 2013 15:28 |  #4

Use the 24-105 for landscapes first and if you feel like you need a wider lens, buy the 17-40.


Canon Equipment, Elinchrom RX300, 39" DO, 53" Midi, Pelican 1650, 1560, Thinktank HD

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrickR
Cream of the Crop
5,935 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Dallas TX
     
Aug 04, 2013 15:33 |  #5

50mm not being or being good for portraits is a matter of preference. I you like FOV of the 50 on your 550d for portraits then you may find it too wide on the 6d, but that is up to you to determine. There are some really good deals on 85s in the for sale section so that might make the 85 worth picking up regardless ;)

You will most likely find the 24-105 on the 6d wide enough for most of your uses although the 17-40 will give you a relatively inexpensive way to get wide.


My junk
The grass isn't greener on the other side, it's green where you water it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Huraifiha
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2013
     
Aug 04, 2013 16:16 |  #6

Wow!! Thanks a lot guys :D

I think i made up my mine. I'll be getting the 85mm first since i could use the 24-105 for landscape shots and most of my shots are portraits.


Haider
Canon 6D | 17-40 | 24-70 | 70-200 | 85 f1.8 | 40 |
| Flickr (external link) | | 500 (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
george ­ m ­ w
Goldmember
Avatar
4,022 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
     
Aug 04, 2013 17:09 |  #7

Since you have the 24-105, you could use it for most of your wider shooting. If later you decide you want something ultra wide to add to that, I would recco considering a fixed wide, like a 15mm or similar.
You will like the 85 1.8 on the FF. It will work well both in the studio and for outdoor location shooting. Outdoors, used correctly, it can produce photos with very nice BG blur.

And yes, welcome to the forum. Do some searches thru the forum for threads that have photos taken with the lenses you are considering. You will find plenty of inspiration there.


regards, george w

"It's also obvious that people determined to solve user error with more expensive equipment will graduate to expensive user error."
Dave N.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eddie3dfx
Senior Member
486 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2009
     
Aug 04, 2013 19:07 |  #8

I read somewhere that the 17-40 does exceptionally well on the 6d.
I guess from a technical standpoint, why does the sensor/optics combination improve on this sensor/combo over a crop or older full frame?
or maybe it's just an exageration


Canon 6D, Canon L 24-105, Zeiss Distagon 28mm 2.8, Planar 50mm 1.4, Planar 85mm 1.4, Sonnar 135mm 2.8 & Zeiss Mutar 2x, Canon 50mm 1.8
http://www.edwinraffph​otography.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Aug 04, 2013 19:51 |  #9

For little more than the price of the 17-40, you could get the 85/1.8 for portraits and a Canon 20/2.8 for wider shots. Those two primce and the 24-105 would be a good starting setup.

You should be able to use your 550D to ISO 3200 without too much problem, and 6400 with a bit of extra noise reduction (see Teamspeed's posts about high ISO 7D shooting... it's the same sensor and processing as in the 550D).

6D will be about a stop better shooting RAW, maybe 2 or 3 stops shooting in-camera JPEGs.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DigitalTechLife
Member
116 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: London, UK
     
Aug 05, 2013 03:39 |  #10

I have bought all three lens's over the last three months and moved from 550d to 6d. Indoors the IS on the 24-105mm means I use it more than any other lens. You should get the 24-105mm.

I did post a noise test video on YouTube a couple weeks ago called full frame vs crop sensor (noise test) in which I compared pictures taken with both 550d & 6d


6D | 550D | 17-40 F4 L | 24-105mm F4 L | Canon 50mm F/1.4 | Canon 55-250mm | Canon 85mm F/1.8 | Tamron 17-50mm F/2.8 VC | Opteka 6.5mm |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Huraifiha
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2013
     
Aug 05, 2013 03:59 |  #11

Thanks again everyone :)

I will consider buying a wide prime lens but i still prefer the flexibility with the zoom wide lenses in order to pick the best composition.

@DigitalTechLife
would you please post the link for the video? and does the 17-40mm go along with the 24-105?


Haider
Canon 6D | 17-40 | 24-70 | 70-200 | 85 f1.8 | 40 |
| Flickr (external link) | | 500 (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DigitalTechLife
Member
116 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: London, UK
     
Aug 05, 2013 04:26 |  #12

Huraifiha wrote in post #16182143 (external link)
Thanks again everyone :)

I will consider buying a wide prime lens but i still prefer the flexibility with the zoom wide lenses in order to pick the best composition.

@DigitalTechLife
would you please post the link for the video? and does the 17-40mm go along with the 24-105?

at work so I can't look for link now. Between the 24-40mm range I prefer the 24-105mm due to the IS. in the short term for landscapes you can always do a panoramic and stitch with Photoshop or other software. I bought 6d body first then the 24-105mm followed by the 17-40mm and lastly the 85mm.


6D | 550D | 17-40 F4 L | 24-105mm F4 L | Canon 50mm F/1.4 | Canon 55-250mm | Canon 85mm F/1.8 | Tamron 17-50mm F/2.8 VC | Opteka 6.5mm |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,151 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
17-40mm for 6d?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1451 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.