Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 25 Jan 2006 (Wednesday) 07:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lab Printing

 
Kristy
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,583 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 77
Joined Sep 2005
Location: A dream world where nothing is what it seems.
     
Jan 25, 2006 07:48 |  #1

I've been using WHCC for my prints. Lately their prints are coming back with a yellow-green undertone. I cannot calibrate to match and am wondering what other pro labs people are using. I don't want to use CostCo or Sam's Club.
Thanks!


Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take,but by the moments that take our breath away.
~George Carlin
Kristy :D 5D MkIII, 24-70 / f2.8 L, 2 AB800's, and some modifiers.
My Website Page (external link)
My Flickr Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bad81637
Member
Avatar
102 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: South Central PA, USA
     
Jan 25, 2006 08:00 |  #2

I actually get decent results from Costco. I have a calibrated and profiled monitor (with the Colorvision Spyder2) and I use the ICC profiles (from Drycreek Photo) for my local Costco Noritsu printer. I can't say the colors are dead perfect, but they're pretty close. I print mainly 4x6's and 5x7's.


- Brian
Canon 60D | 55-250 f4-5.6 IS II | 50mm f/1.8 | Speedlite 430EX
Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 EX APO DG Macro | 70-300 f4-5.6 APO DG Macro
Tamron 24-135 f/3.5-5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kristy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,583 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 77
Joined Sep 2005
Location: A dream world where nothing is what it seems.
     
Jan 25, 2006 08:09 |  #3

Yes, I know... costco does a decent job of printing, but I want to use a pro lab that offers other services other than just plain prints. Also, the photo staff at my costco is very rude and I hate going there.


Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take,but by the moments that take our breath away.
~George Carlin
Kristy :D 5D MkIII, 24-70 / f2.8 L, 2 AB800's, and some modifiers.
My Website Page (external link)
My Flickr Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Jan 25, 2006 08:21 |  #4

If you're getting back prints like that from WHCC I'd have to venture a guess that it's your fault, not their's. Is your system calibrated? Do you include ICC profile in the files? Are you sending them "pre-flighted" files or are you paying them to do some processing?

Beyond that, if you like WHCC you'll probably like West Coast Imaging.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kristy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,583 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 77
Joined Sep 2005
Location: A dream world where nothing is what it seems.
     
Jan 25, 2006 08:27 |  #5

Thanks Scottes. I am calibrated, and using their profiles for soft proofing. I've worked with Monaco and WHCC and Monaco says it WHCC's profile that looks warm, WHCC says to call Monaco... I'm frustrated and have been holding 2 customer orders while waiting for test prints. Test prints keep coming back warm and I've reduced my monitor to a 53K color temp which is close, but looks warm. WHCC wants me to reduce yellow from each print I send... not a realistic option... If you have any suggestions I would be happy to learn.


Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take,but by the moments that take our breath away.
~George Carlin
Kristy :D 5D MkIII, 24-70 / f2.8 L, 2 AB800's, and some modifiers.
My Website Page (external link)
My Flickr Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Jan 25, 2006 08:43 |  #6

OK, you're doing the right thing. About the only other option I know about would be to get someone like Dry Creek Photo to build you a custom color profile for their printer, but that seems like the wrong way to correct their problem.

Because of time constraints, I'd look for a local "pro" or "semi-pro" lab near you. Or even a local non-chain photo store. Give them one of your pics set to sRGB and specify "no color corrections" and see what they produce for a print. Though you won't have their printer profile the colors should still be close enough. If their print looks off then it's your system, if the print looks OK then I'd ditch WHCC. Printing at West Coast will mean 10-14 days before you get your prints, so this is a fast, cheap way to do a simple check.

If the local place's print looks off then I'd delete all your saved settings - calibration, profiles, soft-proofs, everything - and start over. Double-check each step to make sure you're doing it correctly, just to be sure. And then go local again, and see what happens.

Something's definitely off in this process - your calibrated system should not be producing off-color prints at a place like WHCC. Now the trick is to find the exact problem...


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dchemist
Goldmember
1,632 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Woodbury, Connecticut
     
Jan 25, 2006 08:57 as a reply to  @ Scottes's post |  #7

I use WHCC for my work and have not had this problem so far. When I signed up at WHCC they asked for several sample images that I sent and they printed and returned to me to make sure that I would be satisfied with their work. I still have these files -- if you did the same, and still have the original images you might resubmit these and ask for prints (I suspect they would be more than willing do do this at no charge to you) so you can compare what you got originally and get currently. It would be a good way to make a controlled comparison between their (and your) orginal work and diagnose where the problem is originating.

Good luck,

Dennis


POTN Book Vol4 Astronomy Image Manager and BC Member
20D, 5DMkII, 50F1.4, 100F2.8 macro, 135F2, 17-40F4, 70-200F2.8, 24-105F4, 580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kristy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,583 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 77
Joined Sep 2005
Location: A dream world where nothing is what it seems.
     
Jan 25, 2006 09:03 |  #8

Thanks Dennis... that is exactly what I did. I got a print order that came in much warmer than my screen. So I re-sent my original test images and the second prints came back much warmer and more saturated than the first prints. I am at a loss because I have done everything I know to do.... calibrated using Monaco, downloaded their ICC profiles for soft proofing, changed color temperatures, had test prints, and re-test prints done, and still not getting a great match. Maybe my expectations are not realistic... I just hate to see those yellow undertones in the skin tones...


Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take,but by the moments that take our breath away.
~George Carlin
Kristy :D 5D MkIII, 24-70 / f2.8 L, 2 AB800's, and some modifiers.
My Website Page (external link)
My Flickr Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Jan 25, 2006 09:29 |  #9

If you sent in the original test files - untouched, not re-processed - then the resulting prints should be identical (to the naked eye) to the original test prints you got. If not, they're doing something wrong.

Key here is that you sent the original test file which is **identical** to the first time you sent it.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kristy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,583 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 77
Joined Sep 2005
Location: A dream world where nothing is what it seems.
     
Jan 25, 2006 09:35 |  #10

Yes, that's exactly what I did. I had the original test file in my WHCC folder so when I noticed the problem I resent 2 of my original test files and a couple new files. I feel so lost. They are being very helpful, and have spent time on the phone working with me but so far the person I am working with seems to have over-stepped her knowledge base. I'm waiting for a call from the next person who can try to help resolve this.


Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take,but by the moments that take our breath away.
~George Carlin
Kristy :D 5D MkIII, 24-70 / f2.8 L, 2 AB800's, and some modifiers.
My Website Page (external link)
My Flickr Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Jan 25, 2006 10:00 |  #11

To me it seems pretty definitive if the two versions of the test print look different.

Now it is possible that they've gone through some changes - different batch of inks or papers can produce different colors, but usually not so much that the naked eye can easily tell the difference. Even if the prints came from two different printers they should be close enough to the naked eye since all of their printers theoretically should be calibrated to produce the same colors. Again, to the naked eye.

Given the differences between the two versions of the test prints - and that's the only thing I'd need for an argument - I'd be all over them to fix the issue. These test prints cover them, but they also cover you at times like this.

Given the prices they charge (which are more than many of us want to pay but more or less standard for this quality) and the fact that they make you print 5 test images, well, I'd be quite upset at this point. At them.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kristy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,583 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 77
Joined Sep 2005
Location: A dream world where nothing is what it seems.
     
Jan 25, 2006 10:10 |  #12

Yes, I agree... I'm trying to be patient, but this is going on 3 1/2 weeks and I really need to get this print job ordered. Darn it.,. I'm giving them a little slack because when I did my original test prints, I was calibrated with Adobe Gamma, and since I have calibrated with the Monaco... but I didn't change my files, so I would understand a difference on the appearance of my monitor, but think the prints should remain unchanged.... Am I right in thinking this? Anyway, I did a run of the same test prints with another company yesterday so we will see what they look like. I really like WHCC and the products they offer, and their levels of customer service are always very nice. I am hoping to resolve this so I can continue using them.


Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take,but by the moments that take our breath away.
~George Carlin
Kristy :D 5D MkIII, 24-70 / f2.8 L, 2 AB800's, and some modifiers.
My Website Page (external link)
My Flickr Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Jan 25, 2006 10:52 as a reply to  @ Kristy's post |  #13

Kristy wrote:
...but think the prints should remain unchanged.... Am I right in thinking this?

Absolutely you are correct. If the files were unchanged the prints should be unchanged.

3-1/2 weeks?? :shock:
I'd be livid, absolutely livid.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kristy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,583 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 77
Joined Sep 2005
Location: A dream world where nothing is what it seems.
     
Jan 25, 2006 18:27 |  #14

Well the 3 1/2 weeks is how much time I have spent trying to get my monitor to look like their prints, ordering re-test prints, talking to tech support at Monaco, etc... I don't want to give WHCC a bad name because I think they do an awesome job. For some reason I am just having a problem with this yellow tone in my prints... they don't know why... It will be interesting to see how prints come back from another place. That may answer my quest.


Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take,but by the moments that take our breath away.
~George Carlin
Kristy :D 5D MkIII, 24-70 / f2.8 L, 2 AB800's, and some modifiers.
My Website Page (external link)
My Flickr Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,743 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Lab Printing
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1595 guests, 118 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.