Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 14 Aug 2013 (Wednesday) 01:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1st try of the night sky (hmmm, not sure about the result)

 
967stuart
Member
Avatar
50 posts
Joined Apr 2013
Location: England - Hertfordshire
     
Aug 14, 2013 01:24 |  #1

Hi Guys,

All the talk of the meteor showers inspired me to take some pics of the night sky last night.

I'm not sure If I'm expecting too much... based on some of the stunning photos that get posted on here (or I'm just impatient!;) )

I tried to do a photo stack (with photoshop), I'm not sure if I did it right?
I took 17 shots and stacked them in CS6 (auto aligned)...

I had a few more tries with mixed results.

Not sure if I went about it the right way?

(just to note, the light pollution is BAD were I live).

Here's my first attempt -

IMAGE: http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af244/967stuart/MERGED_zpsd97e19b1.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://s1012.photobuck​et.com …RGED_zpsd97e19b​1.jpg.html  (external link)

Is this Ok(ish)?? Maybe I expected way too much but It's not the 'WOW' shot I was hoping for :D

I shot that with my 75-200mm L-Lens.
Exact setting were -
F/4
Exposed 10 seconds
ISO 1600
94mm focal length.

Would love some feedback from you guys (or some pointers would be fantastic).
Thanks for reading :D



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thanboora
Member
188 posts
Joined Jun 2013
     
Aug 14, 2013 04:10 |  #2

Is this more of deep sky or starscape? seems like a fine start, but if you would like to do starscape, try to shoot in wider angle like somewhere around 10mm-30mmish so that you can include the landscape and stars/milky way. If you would like to do more of deep sky, tracking mount should be used with more zoomed in shot like maybe more than 150mm or even more than 200mm. taking multiple shot and stacking them is used a lot in deep sky with tracking mount.


| SGK | Canon EOS 60D | Sigma 10-20mm |
Gene Kim Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
967stuart
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
50 posts
Joined Apr 2013
Location: England - Hertfordshire
     
Aug 14, 2013 04:26 |  #3

Hi,
Was more a starscape shot I was going for.

I did have a crack with my 50mm f1.8 prime lens but I struggled with the focus... (I didn't have a lot of time to play about with it, but will give this another go).

I was looking at maybe getting a 22mm prime, would this be worth investing in to take some Starscape shots ??




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thanboora
Member
188 posts
Joined Jun 2013
     
Aug 14, 2013 11:44 |  #4

well if starscape is all you want for your style of photography certainly get the wide angle lens with wide aperture like 2.8 or 1.4 lenses. If you have a crop body, it would suggest tokina 11-16mm f2.8 and if you have full frame body go for samyang/rokinon 14mm (this one is really good lens when you think of the price, even though it does not support autofocus. This wouldn't matter too much in night astrophoto since anyway you will have to manually focus the stars into a clear pinpoint image)

I am not quite sure about the 22mm prime, but i'm quite positive you will like the wider one better than the 70mm-200m telephoto lens. telephotolens could get super boring if you just shoot in random direction cuz it will only catch white dots...(if you have tracking mount, it could be a different story but that's more of deep sky...)

Hopefully it helped(even though I couldn't give you the clear answer about the 22mm lens....) it helps when you can incorporate the landscape and some constellations/milky way. constellation, milky way is very wide and thus you will find the wide angle better fits most of the times.


| SGK | Canon EOS 60D | Sigma 10-20mm |
Gene Kim Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
967stuart
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
50 posts
Joined Apr 2013
Location: England - Hertfordshire
     
Aug 15, 2013 01:37 |  #5

^ Thanks for the reply.
I'm currently shooting with my Canon 400d (Cropped) So the Tokina could be a good option.

I've found the Astrophotography on here to be really inspiring so really wanted to start out learning the basics.

Spent most of yesterday researching and seeing ideas for mounting the camera to trackers and telescopes etc... (which I'd love to try).

Have been looking for a close by 'Dark Sky' zone in my area (as where I live is pretty light-polluted), I'd love to be able to get a nice shot of the Milky way, I've seen a few shots taken from the UK with pretty good results (although they were no doubt taken by experienced photographers)

Think I have the bug :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thanboora
Member
188 posts
Joined Jun 2013
     
Aug 15, 2013 02:01 |  #6

great to hear another photographer moving into astro. there are tons of different things you could try and I think you got the idea of exposure settings also (seeing from your post up there). milky way might need some higher ISO or slower shutter speed, thus wide aperture is very advantageous in this kind of photography. Tracking mount allow you to do like more than 1min exposures without star streaking on you image. you can you low iso and can get much better detail in you milky way too.

And definitley this needs some experience of failing and figuring out sometimes, and your images will get much much better each time as you practice! : )


| SGK | Canon EOS 60D | Sigma 10-20mm |
Gene Kim Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
967stuart
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
50 posts
Joined Apr 2013
Location: England - Hertfordshire
     
Aug 15, 2013 03:38 |  #7

Thanks, Really looking forward to getting out again and taking some shots (weather permitting).

Have done some searching and apparently there is an Astronomical Society just down the road from me ( http://www.swhas.org.u​k/index.html (external link) ) and they have an observatory just a few miles from where I live.

Have looked up the rough location and it's right next to a tiny village (marked as the big Red "A" on the pic)

IMAGE: http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af244/967stuart/ScreenShot2013-08-15at092229_zps7ee2d578.png
IMAGE LINK: http://s1012.photobuck​et.com …2229_zps7ee2d57​8.png.html  (external link)

Should hopefully get some nice photos.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thanboora
Member
188 posts
Joined Jun 2013
     
Aug 15, 2013 03:55 |  #8

Great. Good luck!


| SGK | Canon EOS 60D | Sigma 10-20mm |
Gene Kim Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,376 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
1st try of the night sky (hmmm, not sure about the result)
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1813 guests, 146 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.