Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
Thread started 04 Jul 2003 (Friday) 11:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Filter Stacking Order

 
lakerpurplengold
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Jul 2003
     
Jul 04, 2003 11:16 |  #1

Hello! My first post here. I was wondering if there were recommended stacking orders for filters. I currently have a Hoya HMC UV filter and a Hoya linear polarizer attached through a G3 Lensmate adapter. It seems to me that it would be less bothersome to have the uv filter on first - that way I can attached or detach the polarizer as needed. But I am not sure, so can any more knowledgeable member of the forums speak out? Thanks in advance!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saqib
Goldmember
Avatar
1,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2003
     
Jul 04, 2003 12:12 |  #2

you got it right :)

i personally leave both on at the same time - prob not ideal but works all the same (in so far as my amateur/hobbyist eye can see anyway)

hope this helps :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TimNYC24
Senior Member
343 posts
Joined May 2003
     
Jul 05, 2003 04:48 |  #3

Personlay, I leave my polarizer on my lens attachment all the time, and if I want a shot without using the polarizer I just quickly take it off the camera then pop it back on. It sounds like the stacking order you are using makes sense though.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sdommin
Goldmember
Avatar
1,206 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2002
Location: New Hampshire
     
Jul 05, 2003 09:48 |  #4

lakerpurplengold wrote:
Hello! My first post here. I was wondering if there were recommended stacking orders for filters. I currently have a Hoya HMC UV filter and a Hoya linear polarizer attached through a G3 Lensmate adapter. It seems to me that it would be less bothersome to have the uv filter on first - that way I can attached or detach the polarizer as needed. But I am not sure, so can any more knowledgeable member of the forums speak out? Thanks in advance!

In this case, it really doesn't make sense to have 2 filters on at the same time, especially if one of them is a UV. If you're doing it for convenience, and you insist on using a UV filter all the time, then it really doesn't matter in which order you put them on.


Scott
http://www.pbase.com/s​dommin/favorites (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LaiLai
Member
182 posts
Joined Oct 2002
     
Jul 05, 2003 13:56 |  #5

I had a uv filter and a polorizer stacked on top of that, at full wide angle you will get vingetting.

Shannon




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CDubeau
Junior Member
26 posts
Joined May 2003
     
Jul 07, 2003 22:16 |  #6

Maybe not the best place for this question but it may get an answer. Why use a UV filter? My understinding was they were designed to warm up the tones of a pictures when using daylight film.

What is the advantage with a digital camera since you can do the colour balance correction with the camera or software?

Thanks for the info,

Carl




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saqib
Goldmember
Avatar
1,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2003
     
Jul 09, 2003 16:21 |  #7

hi,

UV is used to cut out haze during daylight in so far as i know.

hope this helps :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
igas
Mostly Lurking
15 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
Jul 10, 2003 16:09 |  #8

UV/Haze filter

saqib wrote:
hi,

UV is used to cut out haze during daylight in so far as i know.

hope this helps :)

Yes doc, you are right; at least when speaking of film. Don't really know whether the CCD reacts in the same way to filtering. I'm looking at my own B+W filter and it says "UV-HAZE FILTER" on the box. It also says - "the colourless UV filter prevents the lack of sharpness caused by UV radiation and reduces haze. Since there is no change in colour or exposure, the UV filter is well suited for protection of each lens."
I've had this Schneider filter for donkeys years, way before digital, so might not hold good for digital cameras.

Ian




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ryuwulf
Senior Member
369 posts
Joined Jun 2003
     
Jul 13, 2003 00:30 |  #9

As far as i know with UV filters there are hardly any noticeable examples with or without the filter on.

As soon as i buy a lens i immediately buy a UV filter and forget about it. Basically it will keep your main lens from getting dirty and scratched. If you drop your lens(heaven forbid), the UV filter will be the one getting scratched. UVs are very cheap to replace.

If you really want results on reducing HAZE buy a canon skyligt filter.

If you really want to reduce haze in Black and white photography, use a Red 25 filter. Now there will be a very big difference in Haze reduction litereally.

As soon as i bought my G3 i immediately bought an adapter tube and stuck a UV filter on it. I dont even mess. You can put the polarizer on top of the UV filter and it wont make a difference.

The only stacking order that you need to know are the close up filter stacking order.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,747 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Filter Stacking Order
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1780 guests, 113 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.