Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
Thread started 15 Aug 2013 (Thursday) 19:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

It's Already 2AM: 35th Edition... Welcome to The Blue Oyster Bar.

 
this thread is locked
MOkoFOko
nut impotent and avoiding Geoff
Avatar
19,889 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
     
Jun 18, 2015 02:41 |  #8881

tonyniev wrote in post #17601514 (external link)
My FB posting on Sony A7RII announcement:

Product cycle, Moore's law and the new "Sony" law in Cameras. Gordon Moore said the number of transistors packed in an integrated circuit doubles every two years, it was translated by marketeers and commonly stated that you can get a computer with double the power every 18 months, or buy a computer with the same power at half the price, over the years we see this happened; computers are so powerful at low cost (not only computers but gizmos like BluRay players etc)

For Cameras, photographers were used to Canon and Nikon product cycles, cameras got replaced in three years or more and you can rely on your old cameras for 5 to 7 years.

Not anymore in December 10, 2013 Sony new Mirrorless 37 megapixel Sony A7R hit the US market, I got my camera in Manila on Feb 8, 2014 then Sony announced the A7S with super sensitive sensors that can shoot at ISO 104,000 and more, a few months later the A7II was announced with 5 axis stabilization built in camera. These announcements were nice but did not bother me, the A7R was still the king.

Today ,in 16 months my A7R is "obsolete" Sony announced a new A7R II with 40 megapixel back lit sensor, better image quality, more ISO capability, fast autofocus,silent shutter, 4k video and 5 axis stabilization. Sure the old A7R still shoots amazing high resolution images but the new version corrected some of the shortcomings like AF with Canon lenses using adopters.

Sony is setting a pace in camera life cycle, they are breaking the slow R&D of Canon etal, good news for consumers in one view but bad for resale values of old gears. The A7R sold in Feb 2014 for $2,200 today the new A7RII sells for $3,200 both for bodies only.
Will Sony announce another break through in 18 months? What new technologies will we see by Dec 2016.
In comparison the Canon 5Ds and R announced 4 months ago are just hitting the stores now. Sure it has 50 megapixels but shoots at low ISO compared to three year old Canon5D3. I was looking at upgrading to the 5Dr but with the new Sony A7RII for sure not anymore.

Hey Tony,

Personally, I am a bit annoyed by how quickly they're pumping out new bodies (though to be fair, each one seems significantly better than the last). The speed with which they've been releasing new FF bodies has been about the only thing stopping me from buying their new toys. I don't want to pay $2000+ only to see that investment halved within 2 years.


My Gearlist

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Harm
License to kill... a thread
Avatar
48,727 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Jan 2008
     
Jun 18, 2015 08:41 |  #8882

MOkoFOko wrote in post #17601467 (external link)
Doom was pretty much the first real computer games I'd ever played (unless you count frogger, the original TMNT, and who framed roger rabbit).

Gaming PCs are going the way of the dinosaur. Gaming laptops are in. Only grandpa's game on PC!!! :D

I remember when Doom first came out it was superb, and head and shoulders above anything else...

but then I also grew up with a BBC Micro computer, which had games like Elite (which inspired EVE, and Elite is now back in), but also Revs (that inspired all the F1 games), and that was all on a 32k machine, back in the 80s!

After that, I had an Amiga, which was great, then the PC, then a PS & Wii. I haven't bothered getting anything new of late, because I just don't have the time to play games anymore...


SmugMug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vipergts831
Has the TF retired? Or just being utterly lazy?
Avatar
44,159 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 561
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Taking better shots with an iPhone than MDJAK with a 1DX
     
Jun 18, 2015 08:58 |  #8883

DTBaan wrote in post #17601000 (external link)
#jelly

I will aim for the S this time hehe. I really do need better high iso over resolution. but im glad the R is a big improvement over the a7II. it should be that way.. since its an R :)

as far as lens go.. I am set.

55 1.8, 35 2.8, 24-70. oh wait missing the uwa. dams.. and that 35 1.4. ahhaha

wonder where is Tony and what he thinks of the a7rII ?

Yup im grabbing it to see if i like it. If i do i will keep it but considering sony speed on realessing cameras i wonder if an S version will come out with 18-21MP and the same feature set of the A7rII. If that happens i would rather have that camera. Super high iso with rII specs and 18-21 mp is the perfect world.


DTBaan wrote in post #17601007 (external link)
Tony's been inactive for about a month.. I just pm'd him. hope he is well...

He has been active on IG. Doing well.


FJ LOVE wrote in post #17601105 (external link)
:lol::lol::lol:


Blurr Cube wrote in post #17601236 (external link)
Omar's Pre-orders are your secondary bat signal? :grin: :lol:


FJ LOVE wrote in post #17601267 (external link)
nope, just a little inside joke :lol:

I was going to say LOL!

FJ LOVE wrote in post #17601282 (external link)
correct, now, until we find Roger let's just assume people have lives and are busy ;-)a

Thats who i worry about. Considering his advanced age and not being active on here :(

tonyniev wrote in post #17601496 (external link)
Thanks guys, I am okay, have been busy listening to vinyl records. Not much shooting since it is too hot now here in LV. Also resting and just enjoying here at home. Nice A7R II pre order Omar. The fast AF even with Canon lenses is definitely a good reason to get this new camera.

Yup should be interesting Tony!

tonyniev wrote in post #17601508 (external link)
walkabout in Las Vegas:

Interesting tattoo.

tonyniev wrote in post #17601514 (external link)
My FB posting on Sony A7RII announcement:

Product cycle, Moore's law and the new "Sony" law in Cameras. Gordon Moore said the number of transistors packed in an integrated circuit doubles every two years, it was translated by marketeers and commonly stated that you can get a computer with double the power every 18 months, or buy a computer with the same power at half the price, over the years we see this happened; computers are so powerful at low cost (not only computers but gizmos like BluRay players etc)

For Cameras, photographers were used to Canon and Nikon product cycles, cameras got replaced in three years or more and you can rely on your old cameras for 5 to 7 years.

Not anymore in December 10, 2013 Sony new Mirrorless 37 megapixel Sony A7R hit the US market, I got my camera in Manila on Feb 8, 2014 then Sony announced the A7S with super sensitive sensors that can shoot at ISO 104,000 and more, a few months later the A7II was announced with 5 axis stabilization built in camera. These announcements were nice but did not bother me, the A7R was still the king.

Today ,in 16 months my A7R is "obsolete" Sony announced a new A7R II with 40 megapixel back lit sensor, better image quality, more ISO capability, fast autofocus,silent shutter, 4k video and 5 axis stabilization. Sure the old A7R still shoots amazing high resolution images but the new version corrected some of the shortcomings like AF with Canon lenses using adopters.

Sony is setting a pace in camera life cycle, they are breaking the slow R&D of Canon etal, good news for consumers in one view but bad for resale values of old gears. The A7R sold in Feb 2014 for $2,200 today the new A7RII sells for $3,200 both for bodies only.
Will Sony announce another break through in 18 months? What new technologies will we see by Dec 2016.
In comparison the Canon 5Ds and R announced 4 months ago are just hitting the stores now. Sure it has 50 megapixels but shoots at low ISO compared to three year old Canon5D3. I was looking at upgrading to the 5Dr but with the new Sony A7RII for sure not anymore.

Yup that is the concern. Although many who were waiting for the 5Dr/s are now contemplating a move to the A7rII.

Harm wrote in post #17601731 (external link)
I remember when Doom first came out it was superb, and head and shoulders above anything else...

but then I also grew up with a BBC Micro computer, which had games like Elite (which inspired EVE, and Elite is now back in), but also Revs (that inspired all the F1 games), and that was all on a 32k machine, back in the 80s!

After that, I had an Amiga, which was great, then the PC, then a PS & Wii. I haven't bothered getting anything new of late, because I just don't have the time to play games anymore...

Old man :lol: !


-Omar- Flickr (external link) , 5px (external link)
Phaseone 645DF+...because only the best will make up for my lack of skills.
Beginners worry about gear, professionals worry about skill and masters worry about light

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonyniev
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,625 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 1160
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Las Vegas
     
Jun 18, 2015 09:45 as a reply to  @ MOkoFOko's post |  #8884

For many who use the camera for business there is no question get the new model but for hobbyist maybe not, a good rule could be buy every other crank of the product release.. But the A7RII, it looks like a new winner to get. Their pricing is a little high and not following "Moore's Law" curve.
I was even looking at gray market 1Dx. :-) So many choices at a time I am not taking as much images as I used to.
Cheers


Cheers,
Tony
Leica M10 & M3
Sony A7R4 & A7R
Canon 5D2 & 7D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonyniev
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,625 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 1160
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Las Vegas
     
Jun 18, 2015 10:11 as a reply to  @ vipergts831's post |  #8885

Thanks. As Omar posted I am active on Instagram, FB and twitter like sharing my finds in hunting vinyl records, yesterday for example i found 25 pcs which included the sound track of an old Troy Donahue, and Susan Pleshette movie with the Italian song Al i La, a Chuck Magian, Al Hirt, Elvis, Barbara Streisand, etc.. The previous day I found 13 including Harry Belafonte, Pat Boone, Saturday Night Fever sound track etc I have found some collectibles like mono vinyls of Frank Sinatra, good albums of Abba, Fleetwood Mac, Simon and Garfunkel, and many of the female singers of old.


Cheers,
Tony
Leica M10 & M3
Sony A7R4 & A7R
Canon 5D2 & 7D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vipergts831
Has the TF retired? Or just being utterly lazy?
Avatar
44,159 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 561
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Taking better shots with an iPhone than MDJAK with a 1DX
     
Jun 18, 2015 10:14 |  #8886

tonyniev wrote in post #17601881 (external link)
Thanks. As Omar posted I am active on Instagram, FB and twitter like sharing my finds in hunting vinyl records, yesterday for example i found 25 pcs which included the sound track of an old Troy Donahue, and Susan Pleshette movie with the Italian song Al i La, a Chuck Magian, Al Hirt, Elvis, Barbara Streisand, etc.. The previous day I found 13 including Harry Belafonte, Pat Boone, Saturday Night Fever sound track etc I have found some collectibles like mono vinyls of Frank Sinatra, good albums of Abba, Fleetwood Mac, Simon and Garfunkel, and many of the female singers of old.

Thats awesome Tony. My father owns a 20,000 LP collection. Seriously. He has had many famous DJ's and music producers come to his house just to sample the sounds. Nothing like Vinyl. Simply the best.


-Omar- Flickr (external link) , 5px (external link)
Phaseone 645DF+...because only the best will make up for my lack of skills.
Beginners worry about gear, professionals worry about skill and masters worry about light

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonyniev
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,625 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 1160
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Las Vegas
     
Jun 18, 2015 10:29 as a reply to  @ vipergts831's post |  #8887

Omar, I would like to see his collection and hear his system when I visit you in NYC , one of these days :-). Vinyls are different sound and for an old man like me, bring back good memories. Some of my records I have owned for more than 40 years, a few are my dad's from 60 years ago. I am finding these records once enjoyed by people around that time too.
Read this posting on FB: And below is the current set up. I have more than 600 vinyls only, but buy at 50+ per week :-)
A nostalgic audiophile story and which sounds better: Analog or Digital ?
May 3, 2015 at 4:01pm
I hope this note will help some of my friends understand my sudden interest in audio.

As many of you know from my Instagram, Twitter and FB postings I have recently started to listen to my 25 year old stereo system. This new interest came about when I discovered some old vinyl records in two of the unopened boxes that we packed years ago when we moved here to Las Vegas. Also last year, I had the luck of listening to an uber high-end stereo system in a specially built room of a true audiophile Greg Atienza. That evening of good audio with friends got me to appreciate good music again.

For the last 20 years I have been listening to surround systems primarily from CD's and while viewing television. I have a 7.1Dolby surround at the family room and a 5.1 surround in my bedroom. The 25 year old Onkyo system was rarely used in the 2nd floor family hall.

I grew up in a house always with a HI Fi. My dad was an audiophile, he started with a Phillips system, and when multiplex FM was not yet available, a few radio stations in Manila would transmit on Sundays simulcast FM and AM , he would be listening to the new technology of "stereo broadcast". Actually our first phono system was a monaural system and the cartridge used metal needles that had to be replaced regularly.

My dad eventually bought higher components and speakers. I remember his Garrard turntable and him using stroboscopic lights to adjust speed, carefully balancing the tone arm, cleaning the records and zapping it with what looked like a space age pistol to remove static electricity. He even had a special phono pre amp built that had multiple equalization for RIAA and DIN ( a world wide standard was not yet established so DIN for Europe and RIAA for USA standards). I remember our HH Scott stereo, Fisher and Quad, with variety of speakers including the large ElectroVoice Voice of the Theater. He had good equipment including his large open reel tapes like Ampex and Teac.

In my 4th year high school; as part of my electronics course ( yes I was fortunate to go to a public high school that offered college preparatory courses plus vocation training, by third year I can qualify as an electrician) I built a 100 watt vacuum tube audio amplifier. I bought all the parts at Raon street, Manila's "tin pan" alley and "akihabara" for electronics. Every thing was built from scratch- from punching the holes on the metal chassis for the tube sockets to creating a bus wire to solder all the components. It was push-pull system, a Class AB amplifier ( more of this later on various types of amplifier). My dad used this amplifier for his center speaker, a new trend then to enhance the two channel stereo.

When I got married I started my own stereo system. The first one, I bought in Hon Kong in 1968. was a 100 watt solid state mini integrated stereo receiver with two mini speakers, smaller than book shelf type. I used an old automatic Garrard record player from my dad's storage. I later changed the speakers by buying a pair of Phillips passive 8 inch two way speakers and building a cabinet, by asoking a cabinet/furniture maker to follow a design my dad and I found from "Popular Electronics" magazine. It was bass reflex baffle. I added later some cone and small trumpet tweeters and created my a DIY cross over network ( simple capacitors (capacitance) to filter low frequencies for the tweeter and a coil (inductance) from the mid and bass speakers). When the quad, (surround) sound systems became in vogue by the 1970's I shifted to a Sansui receiver, I also bought in Hong Kong, and added two more of similar DIY speakers. I even added a reverb device that used a pair of springs to create the delays for th echo and even tremolo effects. :-). When I got assigned to IBM NY I sold the system to Dennis Legaspi of BPI, I believe he enjoyed listening to it for sometime.

In NYC ,during lunch time and on the way home from the city (IBM offices at 57th st. and Madison avenue to Grand Central station, to take the train as I lived in Katonah, Weschester county), I started looking for components to build the stereo. Dynaco amps and preamps were attractive then because it came as a kit and I can build it and save money. But before I can decide on an amplifier I must first select the speakers. I hunted for a good speaker, listening at various HI Fi listening rooms. I even brought a record to test the speakers- Pink Floyd- Dark Side of the Moon, particularly the song Money. Electrostatics was the new thing on speakers then. I like listening to vocals and with the large electrostatics, listening was like being swallowed by singer's mouth that filled the room.

Reading from the magazines, I learned that a company in Brooklyn, NYC got awarded a patent and was selling very good speakers - the OHM F. Fortuitously, I found a pair in a high end place in Mt Kisko, a city next to Katonah {and where my youngest daughter was going to her nursery school. the three other children were at St Mary's in Katonah . Google Katonah and most probably it will show the large property for Martha Stewart. At that time my neighbors looked at me with respect, the only other Filipino resident of Katonah lived in a large estate, Don Amado Araneta).

The Ohm F was a demanding speaker. The patented Walsh design, required 65 to 100 watts amps as the absolute minimum amplifier power. With so many types to choose and solid states were coming to be efficient and I opted to get the award winning SAE 400 amp (200 wats RMS per channel) and equalizer equipped preamp, a Marantz tuner and a dual turntable with Shure cartridge. I was set and started buying LP's to listen to. (if you danced in any discos or nightclubs in the in the 80's, chances are you were dancing to music amplified by SAE amps, the SAE400 was a workhouse for loud good music during this period. Glad I lived in a home with wide spaces between neighbors, else they may complain to the village association, I listened to my music like I was dancing in a disco.)

When I returned to the Philippines, and built a home in Alabang, I had the den wired with 30 amp single breaker line to power the SAE amp because the starting current was so high it could trip the circuit if shared with other appliances. When we moved to Forbes, I added another system for the den and kept the Ohm F & SAE in the living room, the preamp is now Precison Fidelity tube fed by a large and heavy Denon turntable with twin tone arms, a Nakamichi cassette and a JVC CD player. The den system was Snell A series 1, NAD amp and CD player. In the bedroom I had the Bose cube system powered by a Hafler amp (later Carver amp).

The Onkyo integrated amps with CD Changer, twin cassettes, tuner and MCS oem turntable with audio technical cartridge and 3 way Denon speakers was purchased 25 years ago for the South San Francisco vacation home. When I immigrated to NY , my son Gerry got us a home theater dolby system with a Yamaha receiver and Infinity speakers with KLH subwoofer. Retiring in Las Vegas, I installed at the family room a Denon 7.1 home theater system with 7 Bose in ceiling mount speakers with Velosolex sub. In the bedroom a 5.1 Yamaha home theater to Speakercraft wall and ceiling mounted speakers and Boston Acoustic center and sub. CDs and streaming are with Samsung Blu Ray player with built in wifi and apps.

Now I am listening to two Dali Lektor 8 speakers courtesy of my eldest son Christian, who is the audiophile in the family who had installed many systems himself. Glad he had these spare speakers :-). I need to upgrade with new Turntable/cartridge, get a DAC to listen to CD and streaming and then a new amp (integrated or mono blocks). The Lektor 8's will need fro 40-180 watts of power. So if tube type amp minimum of 40 watts, solid state should be around 100 watts per channel.

The question raised by some is, why listen to vinyls? why not listen to CD's or live streaming, easier and more current technology. Let me try to explain. Vinyls are analog, while CD's are digital. Vinyls will be closer to the true sounds if reproduced with good equipment. CD's and streaming are trying to approximate the analog sounds of vinyl records and they are getting better and almost there.

Sounds waves are analogs and in simple term too are radio and light waves. They follow the sine wave. Audible waves are the low end of the spectrum 20- 20,000 cycles per second. (Radio waves are are in long wave, medium wave, shortwave 3-30,000,000 cycles per second (or 30 megahertz, (Hertz is cycles per second is named after Henrich Rudolf Hertz ), VHF is 30-300 mhz; UHF and so on, visible light is 430 to 790 terahertz. )

Sounds are made by the singer's vibrating vocal chords, or the vibrating strings of a violin and guitars

Recorded music starts as simple analog sound waves, converted by the microphones into analog electrical signals, and in the vinyl records theses electrical signals are recorded as grooves in the master records. ( in most instances, was first recorded into magnetic tapes). With Compact Discs, (CD's) these analog signals are digitized. The analog signals, the sine waves are chopped into many slices. So in CDs and digital streaming the sounds are really an approximation of the actual sounds, it is not the full sound. For many the chopped music is good enough, for the few audiophiles they don't want to compromise. In my case, maybe just in the mind, like a placebo, I find that vinyl records give a certain sound quality, even with the cheap turntable, uniquely different from CD music. My son Gerry thinks CD music is better. My Son Christian actually listen more to streaming on an apple TV device but thru a DAC (digital to analog converter) devise.

The other reason I listen to records is the nostalgic feeling I get from the old songs in those records.

To "improve" digital source materials sound "nuances" I will use a DAC that will also allow me to connect the new devices like apple TV to the analog inputs of the amplifier. (In the old days the only way to connect was with RCA plugs, one for each channels, the newer devices use digital optics, digital cable, and usb and HDMI or even wireless with blue tooth).

As stated above, I am now researching turntables that are affordable and better than good enough. A DAC and then the amplifier. Interestingly most new amplifiers now, are class D, meaning they too, are digital. Unlike Class, A, B and AB, that amplify full (or half) the sound sine waves; Class D do not amplify the full analog sine wave, rather the circuitry slices the signal into pulses that it amplifies. Just enough signals to approximate the true sounds. Some say this could make the sound too tweety,

Unlike in1976, when I can walk into listening rooms of Hi Fi stores in NYC, I now do my shopping online and rely on other consumer reviews. So it will take time before an actual amplifier upgrade will happen.

I am closer to making the turntable upgrade, maybe in a week, after I complete my research with the advise and help of my PhD son Christian.

Interestingly I saw a packaged deal of a pre amp with DACS, with phono input with companion two mono blocks of 100 watts each. It is Class D digital complete even with blue tooth and usb connectors. Doing more research. Maybe a class D is good enough. I am okay with solid state no need to go with vacuum tube powered amps, but the Chinese made ones are also interesting to review.

I will give an update as I progress into this new hobby. As an analogy, consider my photography hobby. I know my cameras, been shooting for 5 decades, and owned Voigtlander, Mamiya, Nikon, Leica and even did dark room enlarging and developing. I shifted to video and then went "point and shoot" with Sony digital 3.2 megapixel camera in the mid 90's. Went to DSLR with Canon in 2002, upgraded twice but was using Canon's in automatic mode.

Then 5 years ago, I decided to take up photography again and got the semi pro Canon 5D2 with high quality lenses and a second camera the Canon 7D and last year added a Sony mirrors A7r and more lenses. I enjoy the hobby and happy with the results and the good gears help in making those high quality images I share here in FB. I wonder what my new experiences and discoveries with this renewed interest in audio will be.

As the song says- Que Sera Sera.

By the way, most millennials do not need stereo systems with large speakers or big amps, they grew up listening using their headphones. Some of these high end head phones are good and for the young audiophiles there are even vacuum tube amplifiers for use with these headphones.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/06/3/LQ_733221.jpg
Image hosted by forum (733221) © tonyniev [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Cheers,
Tony
Leica M10 & M3
Sony A7R4 & A7R
Canon 5D2 & 7D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MOkoFOko
nut impotent and avoiding Geoff
Avatar
19,889 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
     
Jun 18, 2015 10:32 as a reply to  @ tonyniev's post |  #8888

Tony, that could have been separated into 20 postings. Such a wasted opportunity.


My Gearlist

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonyniev
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,625 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 1160
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Las Vegas
     
Jun 18, 2015 10:36 as a reply to  @ MOkoFOko's post |  #8889

Ya, but will try to make up and catch up here, if any are interested in audio :-)


Cheers,
Tony
Leica M10 & M3
Sony A7R4 & A7R
Canon 5D2 & 7D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chet
showed up to keep the place interesting
44,018 posts
Gallery: 132 photos
Likes: 2462
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jun 18, 2015 10:44 |  #8890

tonyniev wrote in post #17601912 (external link)
Ya, but will try to make up and catch up here, if any are interested in audio :-)


That was a great post. What are your thoughts on tube amplifiers offering a purer sound over solid state?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonyniev
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,625 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 1160
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Post edited over 8 years ago by tonyniev. (2 edits in all)
     
Jun 18, 2015 10:50 as a reply to  @ Chet's post |  #8891

I have listened to tube and thinking of getting one, but solid state designs have improved and I am actually looking at a hybrid at the moment, both for preamp and amp, tube front ends but solid state power, I used a tube preamp before and listening to my friend's $100K system with solid state amps and pre amp it sounded great. Here is his turntable and preamp DAC etc section, his amp is solid state and speaker wires are pure silver

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/06/3/LQ_733224.jpg
Image hosted by forum (733224) © tonyniev [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/06/3/LQ_733225.jpg
Image hosted by forum (733225) © tonyniev [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Cheers,
Tony
Leica M10 & M3
Sony A7R4 & A7R
Canon 5D2 & 7D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonyniev
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,625 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 1160
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Las Vegas
     
Jun 18, 2015 10:57 |  #8892

Look at this turn table and "Tone Arm", actually this is not the most expensive Clearaudio turn table the most expensive is $270,000 without the cartridge :-( His listening room is specially built audio room with baffles, sound panels , void spaces designed by audio engineers, and then wrapped in the blue cloth

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/06/3/LQ_733226.jpg
Image hosted by forum (733226) © tonyniev [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/06/3/LQ_733227.jpg
Image hosted by forum (733227) © tonyniev [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Cheers,
Tony
Leica M10 & M3
Sony A7R4 & A7R
Canon 5D2 & 7D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vipergts831
Has the TF retired? Or just being utterly lazy?
Avatar
44,159 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 561
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Taking better shots with an iPhone than MDJAK with a 1DX
     
Jun 18, 2015 11:58 |  #8893

tonyniev wrote in post #17601908 (external link)
Omar, I would like to see his collection and hear his system when I visit you in NYC , one of these days :-). Vinyls are different sound and for an old man like me, bring back good memories. Some of my records I have owned for more than 40 years, a few are my dad's from 60 years ago. I am finding these records once enjoyed by people around that time too.
Read this posting on FB: And below is the current set up. I have more than 600 vinyls only, but buy at 50+ per week :-)
A nostalgic audiophile story and which sounds better: Analog or Digital ?
May 3, 2015 at 4:01pm
I hope this note will help some of my friends understand my sudden interest in audio.

As many of you know from my Instagram, Twitter and FB postings I have recently started to listen to my 25 year old stereo system. This new interest came about when I discovered some old vinyl records in two of the unopened boxes that we packed years ago when we moved here to Las Vegas. Also last year, I had the luck of listening to an uber high-end stereo system in a specially built room of a true audiophile Greg Atienza. That evening of good audio with friends got me to appreciate good music again.

For the last 20 years I have been listening to surround systems primarily from CD's and while viewing television. I have a 7.1Dolby surround at the family room and a 5.1 surround in my bedroom. The 25 year old Onkyo system was rarely used in the 2nd floor family hall.

I grew up in a house always with a HI Fi. My dad was an audiophile, he started with a Phillips system, and when multiplex FM was not yet available, a few radio stations in Manila would transmit on Sundays simulcast FM and AM , he would be listening to the new technology of "stereo broadcast". Actually our first phono system was a monaural system and the cartridge used metal needles that had to be replaced regularly.

My dad eventually bought higher components and speakers. I remember his Garrard turntable and him using stroboscopic lights to adjust speed, carefully balancing the tone arm, cleaning the records and zapping it with what looked like a space age pistol to remove static electricity. He even had a special phono pre amp built that had multiple equalization for RIAA and DIN ( a world wide standard was not yet established so DIN for Europe and RIAA for USA standards). I remember our HH Scott stereo, Fisher and Quad, with variety of speakers including the large ElectroVoice Voice of the Theater. He had good equipment including his large open reel tapes like Ampex and Teac.

In my 4th year high school; as part of my electronics course ( yes I was fortunate to go to a public high school that offered college preparatory courses plus vocation training, by third year I can qualify as an electrician) I built a 100 watt vacuum tube audio amplifier. I bought all the parts at Raon street, Manila's "tin pan" alley and "akihabara" for electronics. Every thing was built from scratch- from punching the holes on the metal chassis for the tube sockets to creating a bus wire to solder all the components. It was push-pull system, a Class AB amplifier ( more of this later on various types of amplifier). My dad used this amplifier for his center speaker, a new trend then to enhance the two channel stereo.

When I got married I started my own stereo system. The first one, I bought in Hon Kong in 1968. was a 100 watt solid state mini integrated stereo receiver with two mini speakers, smaller than book shelf type. I used an old automatic Garrard record player from my dad's storage. I later changed the speakers by buying a pair of Phillips passive 8 inch two way speakers and building a cabinet, by asoking a cabinet/furniture maker to follow a design my dad and I found from "Popular Electronics" magazine. It was bass reflex baffle. I added later some cone and small trumpet tweeters and created my a DIY cross over network ( simple capacitors (capacitance) to filter low frequencies for the tweeter and a coil (inductance) from the mid and bass speakers). When the quad, (surround) sound systems became in vogue by the 1970's I shifted to a Sansui receiver, I also bought in Hong Kong, and added two more of similar DIY speakers. I even added a reverb device that used a pair of springs to create the delays for th echo and even tremolo effects. :-). When I got assigned to IBM NY I sold the system to Dennis Legaspi of BPI, I believe he enjoyed listening to it for sometime.

In NYC ,during lunch time and on the way home from the city (IBM offices at 57th st. and Madison avenue to Grand Central station, to take the train as I lived in Katonah, Weschester county), I started looking for components to build the stereo. Dynaco amps and preamps were attractive then because it came as a kit and I can build it and save money. But before I can decide on an amplifier I must first select the speakers. I hunted for a good speaker, listening at various HI Fi listening rooms. I even brought a record to test the speakers- Pink Floyd- Dark Side of the Moon, particularly the song Money. Electrostatics was the new thing on speakers then. I like listening to vocals and with the large electrostatics, listening was like being swallowed by singer's mouth that filled the room.

Reading from the magazines, I learned that a company in Brooklyn, NYC got awarded a patent and was selling very good speakers - the OHM F. Fortuitously, I found a pair in a high end place in Mt Kisko, a city next to Katonah {and where my youngest daughter was going to her nursery school. the three other children were at St Mary's in Katonah . Google Katonah and most probably it will show the large property for Martha Stewart. At that time my neighbors looked at me with respect, the only other Filipino resident of Katonah lived in a large estate, Don Amado Araneta).

The Ohm F was a demanding speaker. The patented Walsh design, required 65 to 100 watts amps as the absolute minimum amplifier power. With so many types to choose and solid states were coming to be efficient and I opted to get the award winning SAE 400 amp (200 wats RMS per channel) and equalizer equipped preamp, a Marantz tuner and a dual turntable with Shure cartridge. I was set and started buying LP's to listen to. (if you danced in any discos or nightclubs in the in the 80's, chances are you were dancing to music amplified by SAE amps, the SAE400 was a workhouse for loud good music during this period. Glad I lived in a home with wide spaces between neighbors, else they may complain to the village association, I listened to my music like I was dancing in a disco.)

When I returned to the Philippines, and built a home in Alabang, I had the den wired with 30 amp single breaker line to power the SAE amp because the starting current was so high it could trip the circuit if shared with other appliances. When we moved to Forbes, I added another system for the den and kept the Ohm F & SAE in the living room, the preamp is now Precison Fidelity tube fed by a large and heavy Denon turntable with twin tone arms, a Nakamichi cassette and a JVC CD player. The den system was Snell A series 1, NAD amp and CD player. In the bedroom I had the Bose cube system powered by a Hafler amp (later Carver amp).

The Onkyo integrated amps with CD Changer, twin cassettes, tuner and MCS oem turntable with audio technical cartridge and 3 way Denon speakers was purchased 25 years ago for the South San Francisco vacation home. When I immigrated to NY , my son Gerry got us a home theater dolby system with a Yamaha receiver and Infinity speakers with KLH subwoofer. Retiring in Las Vegas, I installed at the family room a Denon 7.1 home theater system with 7 Bose in ceiling mount speakers with Velosolex sub. In the bedroom a 5.1 Yamaha home theater to Speakercraft wall and ceiling mounted speakers and Boston Acoustic center and sub. CDs and streaming are with Samsung Blu Ray player with built in wifi and apps.

Now I am listening to two Dali Lektor 8 speakers courtesy of my eldest son Christian, who is the audiophile in the family who had installed many systems himself. Glad he had these spare speakers :-). I need to upgrade with new Turntable/cartridge, get a DAC to listen to CD and streaming and then a new amp (integrated or mono blocks). The Lektor 8's will need fro 40-180 watts of power. So if tube type amp minimum of 40 watts, solid state should be around 100 watts per channel.

The question raised by some is, why listen to vinyls? why not listen to CD's or live streaming, easier and more current technology. Let me try to explain. Vinyls are analog, while CD's are digital. Vinyls will be closer to the true sounds if reproduced with good equipment. CD's and streaming are trying to approximate the analog sounds of vinyl records and they are getting better and almost there.

Sounds waves are analogs and in simple term too are radio and light waves. They follow the sine wave. Audible waves are the low end of the spectrum 20- 20,000 cycles per second. (Radio waves are are in long wave, medium wave, shortwave 3-30,000,000 cycles per second (or 30 megahertz, (Hertz is cycles per second is named after Henrich Rudolf Hertz ), VHF is 30-300 mhz; UHF and so on, visible light is 430 to 790 terahertz. )

Sounds are made by the singer's vibrating vocal chords, or the vibrating strings of a violin and guitars

Recorded music starts as simple analog sound waves, converted by the microphones into analog electrical signals, and in the vinyl records theses electrical signals are recorded as grooves in the master records. ( in most instances, was first recorded into magnetic tapes). With Compact Discs, (CD's) these analog signals are digitized. The analog signals, the sine waves are chopped into many slices. So in CDs and digital streaming the sounds are really an approximation of the actual sounds, it is not the full sound. For many the chopped music is good enough, for the few audiophiles they don't want to compromise. In my case, maybe just in the mind, like a placebo, I find that vinyl records give a certain sound quality, even with the cheap turntable, uniquely different from CD music. My son Gerry thinks CD music is better. My Son Christian actually listen more to streaming on an apple TV device but thru a DAC (digital to analog converter) devise.

The other reason I listen to records is the nostalgic feeling I get from the old songs in those records.

To "improve" digital source materials sound "nuances" I will use a DAC that will also allow me to connect the new devices like apple TV to the analog inputs of the amplifier. (In the old days the only way to connect was with RCA plugs, one for each channels, the newer devices use digital optics, digital cable, and usb and HDMI or even wireless with blue tooth).

As stated above, I am now researching turntables that are affordable and better than good enough. A DAC and then the amplifier. Interestingly most new amplifiers now, are class D, meaning they too, are digital. Unlike Class, A, B and AB, that amplify full (or half) the sound sine waves; Class D do not amplify the full analog sine wave, rather the circuitry slices the signal into pulses that it amplifies. Just enough signals to approximate the true sounds. Some say this could make the sound too tweety,

Unlike in1976, when I can walk into listening rooms of Hi Fi stores in NYC, I now do my shopping online and rely on other consumer reviews. So it will take time before an actual amplifier upgrade will happen.

I am closer to making the turntable upgrade, maybe in a week, after I complete my research with the advise and help of my PhD son Christian.

Interestingly I saw a packaged deal of a pre amp with DACS, with phono input with companion two mono blocks of 100 watts each. It is Class D digital complete even with blue tooth and usb connectors. Doing more research. Maybe a class D is good enough. I am okay with solid state no need to go with vacuum tube powered amps, but the Chinese made ones are also interesting to review.

I will give an update as I progress into this new hobby. As an analogy, consider my photography hobby. I know my cameras, been shooting for 5 decades, and owned Voigtlander, Mamiya, Nikon, Leica and even did dark room enlarging and developing. I shifted to video and then went "point and shoot" with Sony digital 3.2 megapixel camera in the mid 90's. Went to DSLR with Canon in 2002, upgraded twice but was using Canon's in automatic mode.

Then 5 years ago, I decided to take up photography again and got the semi pro Canon 5D2 with high quality lenses and a second camera the Canon 7D and last year added a Sony mirrors A7r and more lenses. I enjoy the hobby and happy with the results and the good gears help in making those high quality images I share here in FB. I wonder what my new experiences and discoveries with this renewed interest in audio will be.

As the song says- Que Sera Sera.

By the way, most millennials do not need stereo systems with large speakers or big amps, they grew up listening using their headphones. Some of these high end head phones are good and for the young audiophiles there are even vacuum tube amplifiers for use with these headphones.

Awesome Tony! I know he has off loaded some of his collection to a storage room. Once we moved out him and my mother moved to a smaller place. Back then his speakers reached the ceiling of our home. He had them built to his specifications. I was too young to appreciate his investment in music but now that im older i can think back to it. These days he is happy with his much smaller setup. He still has two technics turntables which i remember cost him more than a 5dr each. His speakers aren't as large since in the down size he sold them off. He has a smaller set which he combines with the Sennheiser HD 800 i gave him early last year. He loves those headphones as he prefers to listen to his music this way now. When i was younger it was the opposite he would blast the music now he prefers the headphones more often than not.


-Omar- Flickr (external link) , 5px (external link)
Phaseone 645DF+...because only the best will make up for my lack of skills.
Beginners worry about gear, professionals worry about skill and masters worry about light

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonyniev
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,625 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 1160
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Las Vegas
     
Jun 18, 2015 12:09 as a reply to  @ vipergts831's post |  #8894

yup, Omar, I am relate to his blasting the speakers, the best way to get the full spectrum of frequency from the speakers. A good amplifier should ahem a robust power supply capable of delivering the power required by the speakers at the various frequencies of the sound. In high end installations they have a special power supply unit. My 25 year old integrated amp has a large power supply that I can notice the lamp sharing the outlet dim when I turn it on and as it charged the capacitors :-0


Cheers,
Tony
Leica M10 & M3
Sony A7R4 & A7R
Canon 5D2 & 7D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Harm
License to kill... a thread
Avatar
48,727 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Jan 2008
     
Jun 18, 2015 12:17 |  #8895

You can't beat vinyl.. So great... I still have slipmats and the stylus to scratch them too... Probably got about 2" of dust on them...

good old technics turntables...


SmugMug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,162,850 views & 407 likes for this thread, 68 members have posted to it and it is followed by 29 members.
It's Already 2AM: 35th Edition... Welcome to The Blue Oyster Bar.
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1551 guests, 116 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.