Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 19 Aug 2013 (Monday) 20:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Do you keep negatives after you've scanned them?

 
KirkS518
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Aug 19, 2013 20:09 |  #1

Getting ready to scan a few thousand negatives (woohoo! Par-tay!). It's going to be a chore, as most of them have suffered horrendous color shifts/fading over the years.

So do you keep the negatives, or do you toss them after they've been digitized?


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlFooteIII
Senior Member
449 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Jul 2013
Location: New York City
     
Aug 19, 2013 21:13 |  #2

I have so far. But I'm a bit of a pack rat. :)

part of it is, I'm not yet 100% happy with the quality that they were scanned at (many years ago), so I want to re-scan at a better resolution at some point.


Specializing in Theatrical Photography. See my work at:
www.alfoote3photograph​y.com/ (external link)
www.facebook.com/alfoo​te3photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,749 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Aug 19, 2013 21:18 |  #3

I keep mine. I've had a few occasions where I've rescanned and got a better result (mis-fed, dust, scanned as jpeg instead of TIF, etc.).


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Aug 19, 2013 21:30 |  #4

I'm also a pack rat, and part of me was hoping that digitizing would give me a reason to thin things out a bit.


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Aug 19, 2013 22:46 |  #5

KirkS518 wrote in post #16222977 (external link)
I'm also a pack rat, and part of me was hoping that digitizing would give me a reason to thin things out a bit.

Heh!

The good news is that once you've scanned them you can pack them up and store them! No clutter needed!

'Course, when I say that I'm ignoring the many many negatives that are, well, somewhere but I don't have an idea where, since it's been, well, 20 years or so since I dealt with them!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drvnbysound
Goldmember
3,316 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Aug 2009
     
Aug 20, 2013 05:39 |  #6

Negatives? What are those? ;-)a


I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
..::Gear Listing::.. --==Feedback==--
...A few umbrella brackets I own...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Aug 20, 2013 06:22 |  #7

Yes.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NinetyEight
"Banned for life"
Avatar
3,207 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Dorset - England
     
Aug 20, 2013 08:37 |  #8

Definitely, they don't take up much room and you never know if you might need to scan them at a higher resolution a few years later.


Kev

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 20, 2013 10:56 |  #9

I have more faith in the continued longevity of my stored negatives, than I have that my digital data will always be available to me. If you stored digital data on ST506 harddrives 20 years ago, just try to find an ST506 controller that will plug into the computer bus that is on motherboards today so that you can even get to that stored digital data.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,175 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Do you keep negatives after you've scanned them?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1053 guests, 104 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.