Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 20 Aug 2013 (Tuesday) 15:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Expecting more from Mpix?

 
RandMan
Senior Member
Avatar
403 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Boston, MA
     
Aug 20, 2013 15:52 |  #1

Hi,

I had emailed Mpix last week and asked some questions that I couldn't find answers to anywhere on their site - just about color spaces, resolution, file formats etc. I got the below response back, which I have copied from my email. How come I can go to Costco or other "less professional" services and print 16 bit AdobeRGB files in uncompressed tiff or png formats, yet the Mpix site I signed up with because of rave reviews here and on other sites only allows the following? Also, I'm curious about the line of "the higher the resolution, the better the picture will be" when he specifies that the printer outputs at 250ppi. Wouldn't a file I sent at 300 or 360ppi just get capped off at 250 anyways because that's what the printer outputs at, and the other 50-110 pixels would just be tossed away regardless? Maybe I'm naive to associate high end printing with larger, uncompressed files, wider gamut color spaces and higher resolution. Am I missing something?
_______________
Hi Randy,
We ask that all files be in 8-bit, sRGB, jpeg format. I have posted a chart below for minimum and optimal file resolutions for certain sizes being ordered. We suggest a dpi set anywhere between 250-300. Please let me know if you have any other questions.

Thank you!

What is the optimal resolution for printing?
We do not require a maximum resolution for the images you upload. The higher the resolution, the better the picture will be. It's that simple. The Mpix printers output at 250 ppi. However, we are frequently asked what the optimal resolution is for the prints we offer.
_______________


Canon eos7D | Canon 50mm 1.4 | Canon 17-55mm 2.8 | Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 | Yongnuo 565ex | Yongnuo yn-468 II | Canon ef28-135mm 3.5/5.6 | Canon ef-s 55-250mm 4.0/5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Aug 20, 2013 15:58 |  #2

Dont confuse PPI and DPI. Pixels per inch is a method of making sure your file has enough information to fill the image size. DPI is dots per inch, an old standard to measure a printers maximum resolution. Some software might allow you to set a low DPI so that the printer reads that you want a low res printout, sometimes used for proofing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Aug 20, 2013 16:11 |  #3

The human eye can only resolve a certain amount of detail, and the printer can only put so much detail onto the paper. If you have a headshot that's captured at 6000x4000px, but you print it on a 2x3 piece of photo paper, you're not going to be able to see every individual eyelash and pore and nose hair on that final print.

If you send a larger file, the printer driver is just going to resample it down to 250ppi - and then further rearrange the image data for the physical dots of ink that are laid down on the paper. So, yes, you're throwing away detail if you send a file that's too large for the final print size.

As for the bit depth and the color gamut - I don't know, I'll let someone else speak to that.


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Aug 20, 2013 16:23 |  #4

Hey, sure, things can be a bit confusing!

My advice is to do "test runs":

Have them print images at your "native resolution", a "no muss no fuss" approach, then submit files that you have resampled to say 250 ppi and then 300ppi.

As to the difference between the 16-bit tiff and the 8-bit jpeg, well for printing, assuming the jpeg is at a High Quality setting, it really shouldn't shake up the print quality and, because they do give the specs, stick with them! As to sRGB vs Adobe RGB, well, if they say that their printers handle the sRGB range best, work with them! Sure, there are printers that can work well with aRGB, feel free to research and check out whether some online providers will do that, run tests, be happy!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,497 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Expecting more from Mpix?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1136 guests, 172 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.